It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Maj. Gen. Albert Stubblebine, US Army (ret.), an expert in photo analysis, reviewed the photos taken at the Pentagon before the collapse and concluded, "The plane does not fit in that hole!" indicating that the damage was inconsistent with a 757 strike.
Originally posted by Mister_Narc
Note the Fire Engine:
i40.photobucket.com...
i22.photobucket.com...
Originally posted by HowardRoark
I bet you think OJ is innocent also.
The "real" killer must be hiding on a golf course.
Originally posted by bsbray11
Forget Howard.
Originally posted by Mister_Narc
Note the Fire Engine:
i40.photobucket.com...
i22.photobucket.com...
That definitely bugs me.
Originally posted by Jack Tripper
It doesn't fit even if you assume the craft was only a single inch off the ground!
When you consider the fact that the engine supposedly hit that trailer.....it's all over.
There is no physically possible way that it could have been a 757.
"The height of the damage to the facade of the building was much less than the height of the aircraft’s tail. At approximately 45 ft, the tail height was nearly as tall as the first four floors of the building. Obvious visible damage extended only over the lowest two floors, to approximately 25 ft above grade."
"I wanna know where there are sections of the engine's WING SPARS...and WING SPARS aren't flimsy pieces of SHEET METAL! Wing spars are designed to take 2+ times the MAX GROSS WEIGHT of an aircraft! I wanna know where the sections/pieces of the HUGE VERTICAL STABILIZER-RUDDER are to be found!"
Originally posted by Mister_Narc
www.newsfollowup.com...
Originally posted by ThichHeaded
I am still wondering about these images.. Providing these are the real images.
There were images shown on TV that looked like this, I am wondering why tf it says 9/12 on it instead of 9/11. You think the government would have their # in gear to have the time right.
And you know, nobody has said anything about this why it was like this or anything... Only think I can think of is PhotoShop.
"The photos, which depict a fiery explosion on the building's northwest face, are each dated Sept. 12. Officials say the date may reflect when the images were catalogued by investigators since they are not the actual date of the attack."
"A bright orange fireball is visible in the photographs but the hijacked American Airlines plane is not clearly visible."
[...]
Officials from the Pentagon said the photos were not released officially by the Department of Defense. A Pentagon spokeswoman could not verify that they came from surveillance cameras.(Cuz these morons were scared to put their names on that doctored film)
"The Pentagon has not released any video or any photos from security cameras from the terrorist attack of Sept. 11," said Pentagon spokeswoman Cheryl Irwin. (SAY WHAT?!?!?!)
A spokeswoman at the Department of Justice, which reviews taped and photographed evidence obtained by federal security cameras, said she could not comment on whether the photos are legitimate, adding that the photos "were not disseminated by the FBI or the Department of Justice."(....hmmmmm...WHY?)
Originally posted by Curio
However, as already said a millions times, it makes no sense to come up with such an elaborate plan of deception - there's no way they could manage to cover every possible angle......it would be far too risky and there would be so many variables. Staged traffic jams, planted witnesses, planted wreckage, etc, etc. No way.
Originally posted by Curio
I really can't make up my mind, darn it
On September 11, 2001, Hani Hanjour boarded American Airlines Flight 77 at 7:50am, though it is still disputed whether or not he had a ticket for the flight, or appeared on any manifest. In the security tape footage released in 2004, Hanjour appears to walk through the metal detector without setting it off, the only hijacker to do so. There is a controversy over whether or not the security tapes indeed show him, since the man claimed to be him seems significantly heavier than Hanjour, has kept his beard (Which the hijackers all reportedly shaved off the night before), and has a different style of hair.
Originally posted by Merc_the_Perp
But what we know 100% for sure, is a 757 does not fit.
That's all that matters.