posted on Feb, 10 2006 @ 07:15 AM
Originally posted by WyrdeOne
Folks who generalize against Muslims or Islam (or any religion for that matter) are 'bigots' instead.
Bigot:
"One who is strongly partial to one's own group, religion, race, or politics and is intolerant of those who differ."
This is normal healthy human behavior within limits, evolutionists would even say it is a critical survival instinct. It is a measure of the
decline of our civilization that the politically correct are so eager to apply the word to others, either being too hypocritical to acknowledge, or
too stupid to realize, that they thus reveal themselves to be intolerantly bigoted. This is especially true when it is applied to those who still
believe in Western Civilization, and who are indeed superior to those who follow a 'prophet' whose life ranks up there with Genghis Khan, Stalin,
Mao, etc. We are "intolerant" for either wanting to keep them out of our societies (for reasons anyone familiar with the history of Islam should
know), or, if they do come into our societies, expecting them to at least tolerate such basic rights as free speech. Why aren't "hate speech
laws" being applied to Muslims marching around publicly advocating murder and genocide, while a Christian minister who peacefully quotes from the
Bible to express mere disapproval of homosexuality in his own church can be threatened with years of jail and tens of thousands of fines? The answer
is European governments know how violently dangerous these people are, and thus they are too afraid to even try to enforce those laws against them,
but they can't admit this because of their own multicultural ideology (where all religions are equally true/false, and equally able to be
assimilated).
[edit on 10-2-2006 by Paul of Nisbis]