It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
There continues to be talk in legal circles that he could pick one of three longtime loyalists: White House counsel Harriet Miers, the first women president of the Texas State Bar and Bush's former personal attorney; Attorney General Alberto Gonzales, Bush's longtime friend who would be the first Hispanic on the court; and corporate lawyer Larry Thompson, who was the government's highest ranking black law enforcement official as deputy attorney general during Bush's first term.
Originally posted by FredT
The article mentions two others as well, but I have to agree this seems like a more likely choice.
Originally posted by GTWill
Previously...
How is Bush playing his cards well? He is picking someone who has no experience as a judge. How is she qualified to be on the highest court in America? What is her judicial experience? Was she a lawyer? Is she just one of Bush's cronies?
Democratic and Republican special interests groups were braced for a political brawl over the pick, Bush's second. But the lack of a judicial record may make it difficult for Democrats to find ground upon which to fight her nomination.
Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., had urged the administration to consider Miers, two congressional officials said. There was a long list of staunchly conservative judges that Democrats were poised to fight, Miers not among them.
Nominee
Originally posted by Byrd
We need to have a meritocracy; not a Bush buddy-ocracy.
Originally posted by silentlonewolf
She's also part of Bush's propaganda team, as you can see with RANT's post.
Originally posted by FredT
Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., had urged the administration to consider Miers, two congressional officials said. There was a long list of staunchly conservative judges that Democrats were poised to fight, Miers not among them.
Nominee
Me, the sources, everyone it seems was wrong. We've all heard the rumors, but not a one could believe the President would do that. Where is our Scalia/Thomas.
I think I'll let the President fight this battle himself, for now.
It appears, for what it is worth, that George W. Bush was the ultimate stealth nominee. He has acted like a true-blue conservative, talking the talk and walking the tax cut walk. But, he has expanded government, spent the future, and now nominated she who has the potential to be a female Souter.
Let's hope I'm wrong, but right now I'm not impressed.
Originally posted by marg6043
60, single, not children, dedicated to her work as bush sniffing pet, hum. . .
[edit on 3-10-2005 by marg6043]