It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Rren
[ Well marg that would be an interesting turn of events indeed. A lesbian conservative bush cronie, who's the president's opposition gonna be? Maybe Reid knows something the White House doesn't. This should be fun.
Originally posted by shots
Meier's could turn out to be a controversial choice simply because she was never a Judge. She does however appear to have a number of awards in the legal field and several firsts for female attorneys in Texas.
[edit on 10/3/2005 by shots]
Originally posted by RANT
I don't think anyone (other than some on the far right of the far right) suspects she's actually gay,
Originally posted by Rren
Maybe Reid knows something the White House doesn't. This should be fun.
Originally posted by Odium
Wait...
In the U.S. you can be the highest level judge yet never have been a judge prior to this?
That's stupid and crazy...oh my lord...
[State of shock here.]
Originally posted by shots
Not crazy at all that is the way the system has worked for hundreds of years and rather well I might add. Her nomination now brings the total to 35 as I recall it could be 34 or even 36 that is not the point. The fact is that roughy 35 previous members of the court were never judges. Several also were never lawyers I might add.
Published on Monday, October 3, 2005 by ThinkProgress.org
Right-Wing Peanut Gallery Hits Miers Hard
The Washington Post recently reported that Bush might go with a Supreme Court nominee that would soothe his conservative political base:
The president’s core supporters are urging bold action to sway the court to the right. Some think Bush might pick a hard-liner to keep his base happy and prevent a further drop in the polls.
It looks like Bush did just the opposite. Here what some conservatives are saying about the Miers nomination:
Michelle Malkin: “What Julie Myers is to the Department of Homeland Security, Harriet Miers is to the Supreme Court. It’s not just that Miers has zero judicial experience. It’s that she’s so transparently a crony/’diversity’ pick while so many other vastly more qualified and impressive candidates went to waste. If this is President Bush’s bright idea to buck up his sagging popularity–among conservatives as well as the nation at large–one wonders whom he would have picked in rosier times. Shudder.”
National Review’s David Frum: “The Miers nomination, though, is an unforced error. … [N]obody would describe her as one of the outstanding lawyers in the United States.”
American Spectator Blog: “ There is now talk of among some conservatives about a filibuster of the Miers nomination. …According to several White House sources, few inside the building took the possibility of a Miers nomination seriously. Now that it’s a reality, they are stunned. ‘We passed up Gonzales for this?’ was one conservative staffer’s reaction.”
Instapundit: “Perhaps they’ll change my mind, but so far I’m underwhelmed.”
Public Advocate: “The President’s nomination of Miers is a betrayal of the conservative, pro-family voters whose support put Bush in the White House in both the 2000 and 2004 elections and who were promised Supreme Court appointments in the mold of Thomas and Scalia.”
RedState.org: “Color me less than thrilled . . . I just can’t think that Harriet Miers was the best person for the job.”
National Review’s Corner: “It’s an inspiring testament to the diversity of the president’s cronies. Wearing heels is not an impediment to being a presidential crony in this administration! I can only assume that the president felt that his support was slipping in this important bloc, and he had to do something to shore it up.”
Powerline Blog: “A Disappointment: Harriet Miers, that is. I’m sure that she is a capable lawyer and a loyal aide to President Bush. But the bottom line is that he had a number of great candidates to choose from, and instead of picking one of them–Luttig, McConnell, Brown, or a number of others–he nominated someone whose only obvious qualification is her relationship with him.”
Southern Appeal: “I am done with President Bush: Harriet Miers? Are you freakin’ kidding me?! Can someone–anyone–make the case for Justice Miers on the merits? Seriously, this is the best the president could do?”
Right Wing News: “Disaster, Thy Name Is Harriet Miers: George Bush’s decision to appoint Harriet Miers to the Supreme Court is bitterly disappointing. Miers is a Bush crony with no real conservative credentials, who leapfrogged legions of more deserving judges just because she was Bush’s pal.”
Originally posted by brimstone735
Now's not the time to be rabid, now's the time to recognize a gift when it arrives under the tree.
From the American Spectator site,
"Just spoke with a staffer for a conservative member of the Judiciary Committee whose boss is extremely unhappy about the nomination of Harriet Miers.
"We heard her name. We made it clear that she was unacceptable as a nominee on the basis of qualifications and her views, which we simply don't know anything about," says the staffer. "We worked with her on policy issues, though, before she was elevated to White House counsel and let's just say we were underwhelmed."
"There is now talk of among some conservatives about a filibuster of the Miers nomination. Never mind the Al Gore donations or the money that was floated to the DNC when Miers was a managing partner in a law firm, those can be explained away as "good for the business of the firm...
"According to several White House sources, few inside the building took the possibility of a Miers nomination seriously. Now that it's a reality, they are stunned. "We passed up Gonzales for this?" was one conservative staffer's reaction. "I don't know much about Gonzales, but I think I know enough that he's more of a conservative than Harriet is."
from RANT
I don't think anyone (other than some on the far right of the far right) suspects she's actually gay, just another in the Family Values Inner Circle of neo-con eunuch foot soldiers that's never had a date.
Originally posted by jsobecky
She's probably the burnt offering that Bush put up there, in hopes that she'll be turned down. Then we get to see and hear the rest of the story....
Originally posted by RANT
Here's her 1989 application to the Lesbian/Gay Political Coalition of Dallas.