It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by smallpeeps
Okay so let's say you intend to simply target mecca with a conventional missle or offshore heavy guns. Think about every Muslim who will be at prayer the next day. They'll all be praying to a smoking crater.
How do you think they will react? Do you imagine that they will quietly sit down and westernize? I imagine they would see it as an armageddon-type provocation. What do you think would happen after that?
Originally posted by JudahMaccabbi
With this in mind, wouldn't it be fair to say that should the US be attacked again on its soil by Muslim fundamentalists, the US would be Justified to bomb MECCA?
But why should the US become a punching bag for a LARGE group of thugs supported by Arab/Muslim countries.
Originally posted by smallpeeps
Yeah but AMM, how do you propose to go about 'threatening' them? Should we move ourselves to DEFCON2 or something like Kissinger and Nixon did in 1973? Mobilize our missile boats and play wargames in the persian gulf?
Don't you think the international court of law would see us as having antagonized Iran and arabs in general? I say the answer is yes. We (the USA) already have stated that our policy is pre-emptive warfare. What do you think that means for the Busheir reactor and any tenuous middle east peace?
It is foolish to talk so glibly in regard to nuclear weapons. Would you propose a ground-burst nuke? Something that'd carry lots of lethally irradiated silica into India and beyond? You cannot threaten with nukes because that just makes people's trigger-fingers even more itchy.
Originally posted by smallpeeps
As an American, I have never made a pilgrimage to the WTC and I do not plan to do so.
I also do not pray, daily, in the direction of Wall Street.
Originally posted by 27jd
He is also very aware there's no way in hell he's going to convert America, or the west in general. We stand squarely in the way of what he wants, and he and other fundamentalists have made it perfectly clear we are the enemy.
How can you not take into account the value extremists place on martyrdom, and why would the most extreme not feel an attack on Mecca to be the ultimate martyrdom to carry out the will of god?
I'm aware that you mean to threaten. That was my first point, that if they took the threat seriously, it wouldn't be a threat but an invitation. And if they didn't take us seriously what's the point anyway?
I tend to agree, but I wouldn't say there's no way. That's why I stated the possibility of Russia getting involved, but I guess that's irrelevant if we're just making empty threats.
They would probably start by attacking our interests overseas and drawing our soldiers to them, from there who knows where it would go, or who would be on who's side. Whatever would happen, chances are would suck.
Originally posted by JudahMaccabbi
As for playing to Wall Street. I sit in an office with someone who checks whats going down in Wall Street at least 7-10 times a day. That is more than the 5 daily prayer salvos of the Muslims.
Originally posted by Aelita
Originally posted by JudahMaccabbi
As for playing to Wall Street. I sit in an office with someone who checks whats going down in Wall Street at least 7-10 times a day. That is more than the 5 daily prayer salvos of the Muslims.
Checking the stock market 10 times a day instead of praying... Wow, that's some spirituality right there... Some enjoy worshipping the golden idol...
Originally posted by JudahMaccabbi
Originally posted by Aelita
Originally posted by JudahMaccabbi
As for playing to Wall Street. I sit in an office with someone who checks whats going down in Wall Street at least 7-10 times a day. That is more than the 5 daily prayer salvos of the Muslims.
Checking the stock market 10 times a day instead of praying... Wow, that's some spirituality right there... Some enjoy worshipping the golden idol...
And I thought Uranium was dense!!!
Originally posted by cmdrpaddy
this is the most screwed up thread ever
To indiscrimantly bomb/nuke Mecca, and kill however many of its 1.4 million citizens seems utterly beyond reason. Not only that but its in Saudi Arabia, a supposed ally of the US.
To equate the WTC to Mecca is also stretching things. A major world religious site and, as smallpeeps said, an office building, are in no way related. Yes thousands of people were killed and it was one of the most disgusting terrorist attacks ever, and it was the heart of the world economy, but it should not have held a place equatable to a religious centre, the fact that it seems to is a sad indication of the way money has become so important in the world.
Originally posted by Aelita
It is indeed very dense, and heavy to lug around.
Originally posted by JudahMaccabbi
It is too bad you did not make a pilgramage to WTC. I think most Americans who visit NYC make a HUGE effort to go there. I guess that American patriotism and solidarity is beneath you.
Originally posted by Nygdan
Originally posted by JudahMaccabbi
It is too bad you did not make a pilgramage to WTC. I think most Americans who visit NYC make a HUGE effort to go there. I guess that American patriotism and solidarity is beneath you.
Whats with the abusive comment? A person doesn't need to go to lower manhattan to be a good american. Thats just silly.
Originally posted by Nygdan
Originally posted by JudahMaccabbi
It is too bad you did not make a pilgramage to WTC. I think most Americans who visit NYC make a HUGE effort to go there. I guess that American patriotism and solidarity is beneath you.
Whats with the abusive comment? A person doesn't need to go to lower manhattan to be a good american. Thats just silly.
Originally posted by JudahMaccabbi
Originally posted by Aelita
It is indeed very dense, and heavy to lug around.
LOL, thanks for making my point for me.
And YES, you CAN threaten with nukes! That is the way both sides avoid conflict. It's called MAD - mutually assured destruction. It has worked for 50 years now in times MUCH more dire and MUCH more drastic.
It is too bad you did not make a pilgramage to WTC. I think most Americans who visit NYC make a HUGE effort to go there. I guess that American patriotism and solidarity is beneath you.
Originally posted by smallpeeps
Judah, are you familiar with the term 'Jingoism'? If not, you may want to look it up. You are trying to lead us toward your own view of patriotism, but you're on your own with this one. The WTC was not America. The WTC was a building. Those who lost their lives are casualties in a war, yes, but the enemy has yet to be clearly identified, for me and a lot of other American citizens.
Originally posted by JudahMaccabbi
As I mentioned before the attack can be covert so that the masses do not identify it as a military attack but as an accident or a natural phenomena. This will in effect provide:
Originally posted by smallpeeps
Judah, are you familiar with the term 'Jingoism'? If not, you may want to look it up. You are trying to lead us toward your own view of patriotism, but you're on your own with this one.