It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: cooperton
Yep. Should have been impossibly massive?
No sense of humour, I see.
originally posted by: FlyersFan
Some of the scientific, archaeological, genetic, anthropological, geological information that shows the 50,000 year history of aboriginal people and the 10s of thousands of years they have spent in Australia. I'm sure there is more, but that's all I wanted to bother doing.
Cooperton refuses to look at it. But there it is. Nothing 'secret' about it. Nothing 'made up' about it. Outrageous desperate claims.
More proof Noahs flood didn't happen in 2400bc.
When did aboriginal people first arrive in Australia
Abstract - Stanford University
Genetic Analysis Aboriginal Long History Australia
Oldest Civilizations in the World
Britannica - Aboriginals
DNA Confirms Aboriginal Culture One of Earths Oldest
originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: cooperton
Sometimes a pi@s take........is just a pi@s take.
The fact that you went there through cooperton.........
Anyhoo back on topic i suppose.
originally posted by: cooperton
Mountains that are not on the edge of plates also have marine fossils.
They exist in regions beyond glacial maxima
Sorry I know real data and evidence can be overwhelming for you
Funny how you so zealously support a pop-sci blog article with no empirical evidence but then deny peer-reviewed research on another topic. It's as though you're totally biased
Yeah just like all your Australian aborigenes evidence?
if these continental plates were at one point under the water before tectonic movement put them upwards, why would there be no evidence of water erosion?
originally posted by: cooperton
I see you now finally added some peer-reviewed research to your list. Youre getting on the right track, thank you.
Now Explain to me the evidence ...
originally posted by: FlyersFan
No. It is already explained by the experts. There is no need to rehash what the experts said. The aborigines have a 50,000 year history with 10s of thousands of years on Australia.
originally posted by: FlyersFan
Boulders moved by glacial melt. No evidence of massive flood two miles high.
originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: cooperton
I just fail to comprehend how a joke meme about 2 male Lions getting onto Noahs Ark, with the implication of them being unable to breed, or possibly even gay, equates to some kind of "modern-day pro-trans propaganda".
Fair play to you through cooperton if that's how you choose to see it.
originally posted by: cooperton
"lord science has spoken, no objections permitted, no requests for evidence permitted either" [/sarc]
How did glacial melt reach the equator?
originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: cooperton
I would have thought glacial meltwater does not naturally reach the equator.
Glaciers are typically located in polar or mountainous regions far from the equator.
originally posted by: FlyersFan
a reply to: andy06shake
Glacier melts and regional floods moved all boulders in question.
This has already been addressed somewhere on these multiple threads.
originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: cooperton
No source then?
Here is one:
www.usgs.gov...
Read it.