Did orbs interfere or monitor the SpaceX Starship destruction or is AI playing tricks

originally posted by: putnam6
But let's forget if these are orbs or not, and say they are real and they are blowing up Elon's Starship. Who ITF and why ITF would they do this?

About the Who and Why………..I’m reminded of this true or false…Yarn …..


👽

dont you all remember that other launce in 2016 where even Elon joked about the 'ufo's captured when the rocket blew up on the pad.




New York Post story on the 2016 explosion


Elon isnt really following his orders these days, what better way to get him back in line than destroying something he loves.

He also uses a special chat app he had made so he can talk to his friends and whoever over a real secure encrypted link.

a reply to: Ophiuchus1

I Suspect Sabotage , but it has Yet been Proven .

a reply to: v1rtu0s0

The cats outta the bag with blue beam, so everyone knows the plans to bring out the UFOs.

Unless the aliens know too and its a double bluff

originally posted by: jazzman1122
dont you all remember that other launce in 2016 where even Elon joked about the 'ufo's captured when the rocket blew up on the pad.

New York Post story on the 2016 explosion


Elon isnt really following his orders these days, what better way to get him back in line than destroying something he loves.

He also uses a special chat app he had made so he can talk to his friends and whoever over a real secure encrypted link.

Thanks for reminding me! I enjoy that argument……

Below is a multi-framing of an object with a straight line trajectory moving right to left passing within “grenade distance”, imo, of the rocket nose cone before exiting to the left.

I contended it was an object, and not an erratically launch pad/tower bird(s) flying around Willy Nilly….like the bird flying around after the explosion in the left bottom quadrant of the vid….when continuing to view the vid.

Anyway…..




I still…. after all these years, continue to contend it was an object and it may have had something to do with the rocket’s explosion when it approached and passed by….imo.

👽

a reply to: Zanti Misfit

Space is hard. Failures can, and do, happen. This is why there are so many safety call outs and circumstances that can cause a hold or scrub before launch.

And there are some things that you don't know if they're going to work until you try them. Stage separation (and fairing separation) and the flip maneuver used by Starship/Super Heavy definitely fall into the latter category.

SpaceX has a different iterative approach to rocket science than current NASA. SpaceX is more akin to early NASA, pre-Apollo 1, where it was not as bureaucratic and engineer led.

This time it didn't work. Next time it might. Better chances of success with the knowledge gained from this failure.

Besides, the ULA Sniper retired years ago.

a reply to: Ophiuchus1

birds also tend not to stick around as soon as the rocket comes to life, and the fact they would be very very large birds to even been seen.


In my personal opinion there are 2 types of orbs, the orange, blue, red orbs with a glass like shell and plasma/god knows what swirling inside

the second is what ever all these jets and other platforms are picking up seem to be human tech, the date 21 July 1969 is when we went to the moon and in my life time i will see the 100th anniversary of that.

if you take into consideration the geometric expansions of our computers and other science is extracted from the arcane world of physics i don't see why these recent rash of these orbs that are of the 2nd kind.

I saw a orb in nature and it was amazing, bowling ball to maybe basketball sized orange orb made it's self known to me on a trail walk at night. It was a moment of awe and appreciation for the chaotic beauty of the inside of this amazing orb.

these silver orbs just happen to bein active conflict zones but not attacking(as far as we know) e9ither side shows me they are observation platforms.


either way there is a lot more in the sky and where ever else is just a sign of the times, If any of your Californians are up for a camping trip i recommend the Antelope valley in California. Don't forget you night vision and maybe a thermal camera and if you want to get fancy a simple radar setup(like one you use on a boat).

We are on the cusp of making a large scale leap into space for better or worse.

its hard for me to not at least read the reports as i am an eye witness to this phenomena


welcome to the future my friend.


the better question is it from humans, Ultra terrestrials, ET or whatever is in control of these craft. Other than a few close calls as far as i know no civilian aircraft have ben damaged by these orbs(other than that young Australian who was flying and his last transmission sounded like metal scraping.)

human tech is getting on track to colonize our solar system if it already hasn't been.

something is going on.

a reply to: cmdrkeenkid

It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to know….that the moment lives are lost…..like the Roman Candle Shuttles…..space the final frontier will shut down as they did.

Once there are Deaths…..it’s a whole new ball game. The outcries and bureaucratic fallout will stop any manned space flights for years to come…..even if the death’s happen by private companies.

👽

a reply to: jazzman1122

Perhaps the glowing orbs 🌕 are “theirs” and the non-glowing orbs 🌑 are “ours”…..

👽

a reply to: Ophiuchus1

Better find Doc Brown, borrow his DeLorean, travel back to the 1960s and pass that memo to the then Soviet Space Program. I think they missed it.

a reply to: Ophiuchus1

Nice find, really curious about what this could be.

originally posted by: Omenpath
a reply to: Ophiuchus1

Nice find, really curious about what this could be.

Came across this when further surfing…..

Image is by Trevor Mahlmann for ARS Technica…..dated March 30, 2021. Another orbish object…

A orbish observing probe? Or the cause of SpaceX mishap’s? ….or a single artifact out of the entire image?

Surprisingly in the similar orbish shape of the OP Reuters image.


👽

a reply to: crankyoldman

Mr. Max Q. Clown

I couldn’t resist…

👽

a reply to: Ophiuchus1

That patent and the several others he has also been granted have largely flown under the radar (excuse the pun) and are worthy of a thread on their own.

Both the timing and similarity of one of the others to the "tic-tac" are interesting and considering his background and position and the fact the patents were awarded (only after it was stated that working prototypes were in development) probably takes out the "just a mad scientist" argument.

What that leaves is either a step change technological development or a psi-op, possibly just a part of a much larger programme of which AARO and its previous iterations is also a part of.

a reply to: chunder

Sure the patents can be fully discussed on their own thread……but since we’re talking Orbs in this particular thread…..let me just present the following Abstract Summary from the patent.

I’m no scientist….but while reading this Abstract and Summary…..I guess the bottom line is a flying orb (and other shapes like the gimbal …imo)…with a kinetic utility. But is that the only utility?

Perhaps, if it’s flying…all sorts of payload packages can be added…as in surveillance, etc.






At a minimum Thermal power is mentioned…….it’s that thermal generation that may cause glowing Orbs at night or seen through thermal devices….IR….etc.

👽

"a reply to: Ophiuchus1. what is the power source for a thermal power generator? "micro-nuclear?" "Power generation machinery with power level generation MUCH HIGHER than previously possible." Must be one hell of a DC power source.

originally posted by: play4keeps
"a reply to: Ophiuchus1. what is the power source for a thermal power generator? "micro-nuclear?" "Power generation machinery with power level generation MUCH HIGHER than previously possible." Must be one hell of a DC power source.

You might want to read the Description in the patent…….like I said….I’m no scientist to decipher all that’s written in it……but within the first paragraph of the Description …it is mentioned….

“a nuclear pebble bed reactor 300 (a power plant)”

I’m going to make a WAG and say that that’s the power source your asking about….imo.

Here’s some info….. Pebble-bed Reactor

Callout 300 on the drawing, Fig. 1, of the patent is the pebble-bed reactor….


👽

Bottom right corner.......a reply to: putnam6

For those who read this and wonder what was the Fusible material used? I am voting element 115 Moscovium. The isotope of 115 from Area 51's Bob Lazaar's data. The periodic table is at 121 now. Used to end about 103 when I was a pup.

originally posted by: Ophiuchus1

originally posted by: play4keeps
"a reply to: Ophiuchus1. what is the power source for a thermal power generator? "micro-nuclear?" "Power generation machinery with power level generation MUCH HIGHER than previously possible." Must be one hell of a DC power source.

You might want to read the Description in the patent…….like I said….I’m no scientist to decipher all that’s written in it……but within the first paragraph of the Description …it is mentioned….

“a nuclear pebble bed reactor 300 (a power plant)”

I’m going to make a WAG and say that that’s the power source your asking about….imo.

Here’s some info….. Pebble-bed Reactor

Callout 300 on the drawing, Fig. 1, of the patent is the pebble-bed reactor….

👽