Did orbs interfere or monitor the SpaceX Starship destruction or is AI playing tricks

originally posted by: Ravenwatcher
Back in the News ..........

Footage of UFOs over conflict zones seen for first time: 'This is devastating'

There seems to be a push regarding the UFO narrative slowly planting the seeds for a future invasion . You can't believe anything you see anymore at this point I would say they intended on internet sleuths to find those orbs and start a internet fire storm . I'm so jaded at this point .

The cats outta the bag with blue beam, so everyone knows the plans to bring out the UFOs.

a reply to: putnam6

actually looks to me looks like they multiplied all over the place.



artifacts of some sort

a reply to: BernnieJGato

Artifacts perhaps….even what may have been an obscured 3rd orb previously posted and mentioned….…but then where are the two noticeably 2 darker orbs in the OP Reuters picture and Reuters Link that your picture doesn’t show.

The Reuters OP pic…



In a conspiracy sense of thinking…..what if your picture was scrubbed of those two prominently darker orbs?

One never knows…perhaps that’s when AI stepped in?

👽

Pre-launch celebratory balloons?

originally posted by: Violater1

originally posted by: putnam6
they must have disappeared in this pic


www.reuters.com...

Black orb in lower right corner. SnF for the OP.

ATS poster Phage used to say all this was "pixel errors", if memory serves me. To make a blanket statement that all are wouldn't be fair. To ignore the possibility either way at this point is not fair either.

There are parts of a rocket that are shaped the same as the orbs,usually in the shell/fairing.

I told Elon about letting a KERBIL handle the seperatrons,and to check his staging,but no.....

a reply to: yuppa

If these are pressurized leaks ….then they can act, theoretically, like mini thrusters and affect the trajectory of the vehicle. Perhaps contributing to the continuing tumbling (flipping). And then of course the Roman Candle effect ensued.


👽

a reply to: yuppa

maybe something like these,



good thing there wasn't a picture on the web of this. i can hear them now " circular formation of glowing orbs cuased starship explosion".

when actually it only 27 of the 33 engines firing.

if you watch this video, you see the engine configuration in the left hand corner of the readout banner change when they are firing.

originally posted by: Timber13
a reply to: putnam6

Looks like there are more in your picture! lol


Though the other pic, they look more solid.

Don't get me wrong fascinated by the orb pic over the conflict in the Middle East, but orbs blowing up SpaceX Starship not so much.

But let's forget if these are orbs or not, and say they are real and they are blowing up Elon's Starship. Who ITF and why ITF would they do this?

a reply to: Ophiuchus1

Some good “orbing?” What’s orbi-…..

Oooooh yeah, that’s that thing my buddy always wants to do when we drink where we face each other and touch tips and then you take turns pulling the sk-….oh wait that’s……….thats doc-….Ahem…

You know what, I don’t know what I was saying, nobody need mind me…

SPAM

a reply to: Ophiuchus1

Good catch. Anyone catch it on video?

originally posted by: TheLamp22
a reply to: Ophiuchus1

Good catch. Anyone catch it on video?

The Reuters link to the image in the OP……is to Reuters still images…..I’m assuming there is no video, at least not yet, that was shot at that angle……since the image appears to have been taken by a still camera of the Reuters employee photographer Joe Skipper. There are a few more images that he took at other intervals and angle’s of the launch, but don’t show any other Orbs.

There is a slight possibility that the images he shot aren't all the images he took….but then someone would have to try and track him down in the Reuters organization to ask him to take a closer look at any of his unpublished images, for Orbs and anomalies ….(if there are any additional images).

So far…what you see in the OP….is what we get.



👽

a reply to: Ophiuchus1

Not leaks, they're part of the RCS. This is to control the attitude of the craft when it's in thin atmosphere or space and control surfaces would be useless. The booster engines can't gimbal, so this is really the only way for that piece to maneuver.

EDIT TO ADD:

They could have been leaks, depending where into the tumble that still came from, as it started to break apart

a reply to: Ophiuchus1

the orbs are way closer to the camera than the rocket and if it were parts from the rocket miles away where is all the other stuff?

interesting catch to be sure.


here is a recent catch of and orb like object captured in the cockpit of a civilian airliner

a reply to: cmdrkeenkid

The “leaks?” still I previously posted is a zoomed in screenshot I made off the official SpaceX live stream shown to the world…..



👽

a reply to: Ophiuchus1

Yeah, so nearly a minute into the tumble. Could have been been leaks as it started to stress and fracture then. The RCS wasn't that visible when the flip maneuver started.

I'm not sure how much they would have contributed to the tumble though. At that point the second stage would have outmassed the first, giving it enough momentum to keep spinning as it did.

a reply to: Ophiuchus1

i'm thinking from reading this and and a couple more articles that what you show in the leak image is from the starship engines burning and venting out the side of the super heavy lift main booster during the flip maneuver.

reading between the lines the reason for reason is because a failure of the super heavy main stage engines not firing right and not shutting down during when suppose to.

Starship's first-stage booster, known as Super Heavy, didn't fire on all cylinders during the launch, however. Three of its 33 Raptors apparently didn't light up at liftoff, and two more conked out during the brief flight.

Still, the power of 28 Raptors got Starship high into the sky. There was a brief, bright flash from those engines about 33 seconds into the flight, though it's unclear if this indicated anything off-nominal. Starship kept climbing and made it through the Max-Q gauntlet in one piece at around T+80 seconds, eliciting cheers from SpaceX headquarters in Hawthorne, California, where employees had gathered en masse to watch the liftoff.

The next big milestones were supposed to occur back to back to back just under three minutes after liftoff: Super Heavy engine shutdown, followed by stage separation and the lighting of the upper-stage vehicle's six Raptor engines. But this is where Starship faltered. The vehicle appeared to start performing a prescribed flip ahead of stage separation, Insprucker said during the webcast. But Super Heavy's engines continued to burn and the vehicle began to tumble, sparking moans of concern from the crowd at SpaceX HQ.
SpaceX Starship's explosive test flight: What did we just see?

just guessing, but the exhaust has to go some where.

a reply to: BernnieJGato

The Starship engines never ignited. That would have detonated Super Heavy almost immediately without any tumbling.

originally posted by: putnam6

originally posted by: Timber13
a reply to: putnam6

Looks like there are more in your picture! lol


Though the other pic, they look more solid.

Don't get me wrong fascinated by the orb pic over the conflict in the Middle East, but orbs blowing up SpaceX Starship not so much.

But let's forget if these are orbs or not, and say they are real and they are blowing up Elon's Starship. Who ITF and why ITF would they do this?

Got me there. I don't believe in the whole orbs thing. I think they're just artifacts. There are some strangeness out there for sure, but don't know if I could say this is the same.

It's also possible the images, though looking the same, are different by seconds or so apart.

UFO? Not so much. If there is such a thing, I would believe it more man made than anything else. That's just me though.