Husband of BBC presenter killed by the Covid vaccine is suing Astrazeneca

a reply to: alldaylong

Since when did they coerce or threaten anyone into buying a car?

originally posted by: Itisnowagain
a reply to: alldaylong

I know it did not inform you that the pre rollout trials showed a 1 in 800 chance of getting a serious adverse event.

I don't need to download whatever is on the pdf you linked to know that.

Did they inform you on how many die from motor vehicle accidents when you last purchased a car ?

They should do, as it far more than those who have died from taking a vaccine.

Life's a risk mate, we run that risk everyday.

a reply to: Itisnowagain

Since when did they coerce or threaten anyone into buying a car

What do you mean " threaten " ? Do you mean like if you don't have a driving license you can't do certain kinds of work, or if you are banned from driving and loose you driving license you could also loose your job if it invloves driving?

Do you mean that kind of threaten ?

originally posted by: Itisnowagain
a reply to: alldaylong

I know it did not inform you that the pre rollout trials showed a 1 in 800 chance of getting a serious adverse event.

I don't need to download whatever is on the pdf you linked to know that.

Source for the 1 in 800 please.

a reply to: alldaylong

You didn't have the available information to consent .......that's the point.

They had the infomation and did not share it.

Even now the mantra is 'safe and effective'.

Do you think that it's simply.....safe and effective?

a reply to: Itisnowagain

Do you think that it's simply.....safe and effective?

Do you think it's always safe to drive a motor vehicle ?

Life's a risk. Live with it.

originally posted by: alldaylong
a reply to: Itisnowagain

Do you think that it's simply.....safe and effective?

Do you think it's always safe to drive a motor vehicle ?

Life's a risk. Live with it.

That's a great philosophy but that's not how it works when it comes to vaccine safety. Perhaps you should try again with better lines and better arguments.

originally posted by: alldaylong
a reply to: Itisnowagain

Do you think that it's simply.....safe and effective?

Do you think it's always safe the drive a motor vehicle ?

Life's a risk. Live with it.

I never heard anyone promoting a car by saying it's safe and effective.....let alone coercing me or threatening to take my livelihood away if I refused to buy their safe and effective car......have you?

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: Itisnowagain
a reply to: alldaylong

I know it did not inform you that the pre rollout trials showed a 1 in 800 chance of getting a serious adverse event.

I don't need to download whatever is on the pdf you linked to know that.

Source for the 1 in 800 please.

Several threads on this. A Google click away from the truth.

originally posted by: Asmodeus3

originally posted by: alldaylong
a reply to: Itisnowagain

Do you think that it's simply.....safe and effective?

Do you think it's always safe to drive a motor vehicle ?

Life's a risk. Live with it.

That's a great philosophy but that's not how it works when it comes to vaccine safety. Perhaps you should try again with better lines and better arguments.

Are some people in The UK under the age of 75 being offered the vaccine this spring ? Yes or No ?

Come on i am making it easy for you.

a reply to: Asmodeus3

And they had the audacity to say that you talk bollox!

originally posted by: Itisnowagain

originally posted by: alldaylong
a reply to: Itisnowagain

Do you think that it's simply.....safe and effective?

Do you think it's always safe the drive a motor vehicle ?

Life's a risk. Live with it.

I never heard anyone promoting a car by saying it's safe and effective.....let alone coercing me or threatening to take my livelihood away if I refused to buy their safe and effective car......have you?

Haha well said!!
Their arguments are in a turmoil.
The member who to have replied to provided a link that doesn't work to argue the AZ vaccine is still offered in the UK. Do you have any news on this?? It has been withdrawn long time ago.

a reply to: NoCorruptionAllowed


"So you are boasting here that you have helped people because of your great empathy for things they have suffered from, but I can't ever recall seeing you show anyone any empathy for anything EVER here.

So you lead a double life then?"

Boasting?

I was actually pointing out to a poster who constantly accuses me of "defending the pharmaceuticals " that in my real life I have spent some 30 odd years doing the precise opposite.

Doing stuff in real life is rather more important than posting stuff on an anonymous internet forum.

"EVER"?!!!

Please.....

Quite the echo chamber on here.

originally posted by: Asmodeus3

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: Itisnowagain
a reply to: alldaylong

I know it did not inform you that the pre rollout trials showed a 1 in 800 chance of getting a serious adverse event.

I don't need to download whatever is on the pdf you linked to know that.

Source for the 1 in 800 please.

Several threads on this. A Google click away from the truth.

Should be no problem for someone to provide a source then.

originally posted by: Itisnowagain
a reply to: Asmodeus3

And they had the audacity to say you talk bollox!

It's spelt " bollocks " At least get that right.

originally posted by: alldaylong

originally posted by: Asmodeus3

originally posted by: alldaylong
a reply to: Itisnowagain

Do you think that it's simply.....safe and effective?

Do you think it's always safe to drive a motor vehicle ?

Life's a risk. Live with it.

That's a great philosophy but that's not how it works when it comes to vaccine safety. Perhaps you should try again with better lines and better arguments.

Are some people in The UK under the age of 75 being offered the vaccine this spring ? Yes or No ?

Come on i am making it easy for you.

Yes the immunosuppressed which I have already discussed a few pages ago. But nobody else will be offered the jabs under the age of 75. You took part of my post out of context and you presented it here.

originally posted by: Itisnowagain

originally posted by: alldaylong
a reply to: Itisnowagain

Do you think that it's simply.....safe and effective?

Do you think it's always safe the drive a motor vehicle ?

Life's a risk. Live with it.

I never heard anyone promoting a car by saying it's safe and effective.....let alone coercing me or threatening to take my livelihood away if I refused to buy their safe and effective car......have you?

Almost all car manufacturers mention safety. Volvo built whole campaigns round it.

People don't take that to mean 100% safe.

originally posted by: Itisnowagain

originally posted by: alldaylong
a reply to: Itisnowagain

Do you think that it's simply.....safe and effective?

Do you think it's always safe the drive a motor vehicle ?

Life's a risk. Live with it.

I never heard anyone promoting a car by saying it's safe and effective.....let alone coercing me or threatening to take my livelihood away if I refused to buy their safe and effective car......have you?

Get this car as it's safe and effective. If you don't you will get yourself into trouble and probably get fired. Driving isn't a 100% safe...

a reply to: ScepticScot

Will I be coersed and be threatened with losing my job if I don't buy one?

originally posted by: Itisnowagain
a reply to: Asmodeus3

And they had the audacity to say that you talk bollox!

They have lost the argument long time ago. They ate in a thread where legal action is taken against Astrazeneca pretending nothing is gone wrong when the vaccine has been withdrawn from the UK and most other counties that have used it.