BREAKING: Lawsuit filed against Pfizer by leading scientists and medical professionals

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: Asmodeus3

Because you are being offensive by calling lawyers and Judges unintelligent?

Yes, maybe.

If one succeeds.

Let's see, if one does?

Noticed a few times you seem to circumnavigate the topic and instead focus on character smear.

originally posted by: purplemer

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: Asmodeus3

Because you are being offensive by calling lawyers and Judges unintelligent?

Yes, maybe.

If one succeeds.

Let's see, if one does?

Noticed a few times you seem to circumnavigate the topic and instead focus on character smear.

Pretty much a classical tactic as he almost never engages in the actual conversation as he knows there is nothing much he can say in favour of the vaccine campaign and the pharmaceuticals. But he does engage in plenty of vaccine apologetics and denialism of reality.

A lawsuit by leading scientists and medical professionals is a hell of a story but not a single word about it.

originally posted by: Asmodeus3
www.thepulse.one...

Do you think that there have been no deaths from the Pfizer products or they are significantly low?

Well, I guess what I am saying is that when it comes to South Africa, it would be nearly impossible to figure out if Pfizer's vaccine caused an adverse reaction or if the illness or death was caused by Bayer's bioweapons testing on the black South African population from 1948-present.

One example would be Hepatitis G. Jews and Russian POWs were injected with Hepatitis G at Auschwitz and Sachsenhausen. After the war, Hepatitis G fell behind the Iron Curtain for 50 years. Some of the Russian POWs that were injected clearly had sex with prostitutes after the war and through sexual transmission Hepatitis G spread to 1-3% of the population of Poland and the Czech Republic.

But Western Europe never saw any Hepatitis G cases until after the Iron Curtain fell. So post-Auschwitz and post- Sachsenhausen transmission was securely locked behind the Iron Curtain, thus no cases in free-Western Europe.

Blacks locked into Apartheid Reservations in South Africa were injected with Hepatitis G at a much higher percentage than the Jews and Russian POWs. When Apartheid ended, 11% of blacks-ONLY had Hepatitis G (A statistic from the year 2000). The rest of Africa didn't see Hepatitis G cases until Apartheid ended because the blacks injected were not allowed to leave the reservations policed by Whites.

And that 11% of the black population is actually far less than the true percentage of cases. BECAUSE Bayer has a global patent for testing for Hepatitis G. No other pharmaceutical company can invent, nor create a test for Hepatitis G without infringing on Bayer's global patent. A standard Hep-Span or Hepatitis test only tests for Hepatitis A-E. To get a test for Hepatitis G requires the purchase of a separate test from Bayer.

Rather convenient for Bayer to hold a global patent on testing for Hepatitis G, considering it's roots in Sachsenhausen and Auschwitz under SS Dr. Kurt Gutzeit and SS Dr. Arnold Dohmen. Thus Bayer can intentionally distribute bunk tests to poor black South African hospitals and whichever poor black clinics they choose. And no other pharmaceutical company is allowed to create a competing Hep G test.

So there's a lot of black South Africans that may not know they have Hepatitis G. And they might think their Hep G symptoms or their Hep G deaths were caused by Pfizer's vaccine. Real convenient for Bayer Nazis to blame it on Jewish-owned Pfizer for their deaths.

ANOTHER EXAMPLE of a global patented test by Bayer would be the HIV test for HIV-1, Group O. The standard HIV test that most people get is derived from HIV-1, Group M, Clade B. That test fails to detect Group N and Group O. Bayer holds a global patent on testing for Group O and no other pharmaceutical company is allowed to develop or invent a HIV-1, Group O test without infringing on Bayer's global patent.

So let's say, Bayer controls shipping of their test. They could decide to give adequate tests to CDC Atlanta or White hospitals in Johannesburg. But they could also decide to ship bunk tests to small, poor black clinics in areas around the old Apartheid Reservations. That would mean that blacks would test falsely negative for HIV, Group O after given a bunk test with no other pharmaceutical company allowed to develop a test to prove the person was infected.

So some of the deaths attributed to Pfizer might be HIV-1, Group O, with the patient given a bunk Group O test by Bayer.

There's just too many bioweapons tested by Bayer in South Africa from 1948 to present to say which deaths were caused by Bayer as opposed to Pfizer.

If I were Pfizer, I'd be using the vaccine claims to gather as many blood samples as possible to get a better look at some of the bioweapons Bayer tested. After all, it's only fair that if Bayer and it's Nazis want to propagate the media to blame the Jews of Pfizer for excess deaths and a range of other ailments in South Africa, then Pfizer should be gathering as many blood samples as possible from claimants to get a good look at what the Nazis have been screwing around with.

originally posted by: MapMistress

originally posted by: Asmodeus3
www.thepulse.one...

Do you think that there have been no deaths from the Pfizer products or they are significantly low?

Well, I guess what I am saying is that when it comes to South Africa, it would be nearly impossible to figure out if Pfizer's vaccine caused an adverse reaction or if the illness or death was caused by Bayer's bioweapons testing on the black South African population from 1948-present.

One example would be Hepatitis G. Jews and Russian POWs were injected with Hepatitis G at Auschwitz and Sachsenhausen. After the war, Hepatitis G fell behind the Iron Curtain for 50 years. Some of the Russian POWs that were injected clearly had sex with prostitutes after the war and through sexual transmission Hepatitis G spread to 1-3% of the population of Poland and the Czech Republic.

But Western Europe never saw any Hepatitis G cases until after the Iron Curtain fell. So post-Auschwitz and post- Sachsenhausen transmission was securely locked behind the Iron Curtain, thus no cases in free-Western Europe.

Blacks locked into Apartheid Reservations in South Africa were injected with Hepatitis G at a much higher percentage than the Jews and Russian POWs. When Apartheid ended, 11% of blacks-ONLY had Hepatitis G (A statistic from the year 2000). The rest of Africa didn't see Hepatitis G cases until Apartheid ended because the blacks injected were not allowed to leave the reservations policed by Whites.

And that 11% of the black population is actually far less than the true percentage of cases. BECAUSE Bayer has a global patent for testing for Hepatitis G. No other pharmaceutical company can invent, nor create a test for Hepatitis G without infringing on Bayer's global patent. A standard Hep-Span or Hepatitis test only tests for Hepatitis A-E. To get a test for Hepatitis G requires the purchase of a separate test from Bayer.

Rather convenient for Bayer to hold a global patent on testing for Hepatitis G, considering it's roots in Sachsenhausen and Auschwitz under SS Dr. Kurt Gutzeit and SS Dr. Arnold Dohmen. Thus Bayer can intentionally distribute bunk tests to poor black South African hospitals and whichever poor black clinics they choose. And no other pharmaceutical company is allowed to create a competing Hep G test.

So there's a lot of black South Africans that may not know they have Hepatitis G. And they might think their Hep G symptoms or their Hep G deaths were caused by Pfizer's vaccine. Real convenient for Bayer Nazis to blame it on Jewish-owned Pfizer for their deaths.

ANOTHER EXAMPLE of a global patented test by Bayer would be the HIV test for HIV-1, Group O. The standard HIV test that most people get is derived from HIV-1, Group M, Clade B. That test fails to detect Group N and Group O. Bayer holds a global patent on testing for Group O and no other pharmaceutical company is allowed to develop or invent a HIV-1, Group O test without infringing on Bayer's global patent.

So let's say, Bayer controls shipping of their test. They could decide to give adequate tests to CDC Atlanta or White hospitals in Johannesburg. But they could also decide to ship bunk tests to small, poor black clinics in areas around the old Apartheid Reservations. That would mean that blacks would test falsely negative for HIV, Group O after given a bunk test with no other pharmaceutical company allowed to develop a test to prove the person was infected.

So some of the deaths attributed to Pfizer might be HIV-1, Group O, with the patient given a bunk Group O test by Bayer.

There's just too many bioweapons tested by Bayer in South Africa from 1948 to present to say which deaths were caused by Bayer as opposed to Pfizer.

If I were Pfizer, I'd be using the vaccine claims to gather as many blood samples as possible to get a better look at some of the bioweapons Bayer tested. After all, it's only fair that if Bayer and it's Nazis want to propagate the media to blame the Jews of Pfizer for excess deaths and a range of other ailments in South Africa, then Pfizer should be gathering as many blood samples as possible from claimants to get a good look at what the Nazis have been screwing around with.

You seem to want to discuss social and medical issues related to South Africa. You are welcome to create a thread to discuss them.

a reply to: Asmodeus3

Since then one lawsuit is filed after the other. They were not safe and effective after all...