posted on Jan, 2 2023 @ 06:27 AM
a reply to:
whereislogic
Depopulation and what the current megalomaniacs at WEF call the liberal world order are not conspiracies, they are a stated ideology with books and
interviews espousing those beliefs. They believe that power and wealth should determine who is worthy of life, the arbiters of who is deserving. None
of them are living in mud huts with carbon neutral lifestyles or eating bug gruel. After they all fly on private jets to their private meetings they
aren't dining on crickets. They aren't locked down when emergency pandemic orders are put on people trying to buy seeds to plant the food they grow to
supplement their low incomes. Their donations don't stop rolling in when small businesses are closed and corporate megachains remain open. When they
create shortages they won't be ensuring the poor eat or the thirsty drink. They are not willing to sacrifice their lives of opulence and decadence for
humanity, each of them consuming enough resources in a year to sustain whole generations of the poor. They buy their offsets and expensive organic
free trade foods because their wealth allows them to "offset" their decadence with the blood and sweat of the poor.
You can try to paint any opposition to their attempts to make humanity into a servant class that lives at the behest of the global elitists as
nationalism and patriotism, but not wanting irrational psychopaths dictating policy that determines if individuals live or die isn't right-wing. If
you recall the most reviled nationalist in history was also a socialist.
It actually used to be liberals that supported the rights of individuals to have the means to survive and free will. That psychopaths have hijacked
that label and turned it into what it's become isn't my fault. Maybe if liberals want to reclaim the label they should stop supporting the
self-serving politicians that are willing to sell their own citizen's freedoms for imaginary goals and personal wealth. These same politicians that
adhere to WEF ideology are also the ones that continue to enable global conflict to benefit the military industrial complex. They also have done
nothing to end the virtual slavery of entire third world countries, forced to extract their own resources for hardly any compensation only to see
those resources sent off to become corporate profits for the people that call them worthless eaters.
That they then import these people who's countries they've exploited for kickbacks and to benefit their corporate donors is not liberal, it's forcing
their already taxed citizens to then pay for the illusion that they are humanitarians. That they bomb and wage war displacing people for their fake
progressive front is not liberal. Liberals have embraced every corporate cause that Republicans have, but have put on a thin veneer of woke and
greenwashed propaganda. This just to fool those still living in a world where people that were elected to office felt a tiny bit of responsibility to
their electorate irrespective of their identity politics, for trying to do something other than retain power and make money.
Liberalism is being used as an excuse to mandate global serfdom. They want feudalism without borders ruled by a few wealthy elites who are not bound
by any of the rules they wish to impose on others. They don't want to elevate the third world. They just want to bring the first world down and pocket
the difference, all while eliminating the least powerful and poorest in the third world to give those that survive the illusion of prospering. A lucky
few win the lottery and make it to the promised land while the others are left behind to "prosper" on the scraps. All this at the cost of basic human
rights and the freedom to independently pursue the means to survive.
Maybe actual liberals should start reclaiming the label. Perhaps they should stop pretending that a lip service to a pride flag in the most permissive
and aflluent countries in the world is of critical importance while millions of the poorest are dying from the bombs they pay for and the resources
their politicians allow to be exploited for their corporate donors. After they prove they can stop murdering and subjugating the rest of the world
they can argue they care about it or deserve any more widespread influence than they already have. If these leaders can't be bothered to stop
exploiting the people that elect them while they all already have enormous wealth what hope do people in the third world have?
edit on 1/2/23
by Ksihkehe because: Autocorrect type
edit on 1/2/23 by Ksihkehe because: Typo
edit on 1/2/23 by Ksihkehe because:
Apparently I'm correcting them one at a time
edit on 1/2/23 by Ksihkehe because: (no reason given)