What is the plan for the New World Order?

Are we aware of anyone who has obtained detailed knowledge on what the new world order has in the works?

Are there any good compilations of things they have put in place so far? Usually people say these plans go back hundreds of years, but has anyone got a rough or specific timeline handy?

Any good resources on the big picture, end goals etc?

as simply as I can their goal looks to just survive each day their own blunder with little in terms of actual planning.. its why they are bandwagon jumping so many academic theories and that are ever closer to the fringe..

all the wile the only thing they are doing is radicalising their own support bases..

if we end up in a war internal or external it'll be due to the obscene levels of incompetence from a strata where failure is seen as the defining virtue..

a reply to: Brigadier

Agenda 2030. UBI. Biometric validation. Vaccine-to-play. EV transportation (so none really) Get rid of sovereign governments by overwhelming nations in a variety of extraordinary and detrimental means.

Hegelian dialectic. Khalergi Plan. Cloward-Piven Strategy. The Wall. Etc. etc.

Basically Orwell’s description of the future.

a reply to: slatesteam

which all scream the desperate academic fringes they are operate in and the bandwagons they are jumping just to get tomorrow while we all exist at the "let them eat cake" stage which the likes of cop27 represents in all its absurd glory..

a reply to: Brigadier

Corporate governance of sorts. The nation state has been in decline for a while now. Washington and the like is basically a headquarters for keeping corporations in power and forever expanding their markets into new territory, or gobbling them up and replacing them with what ever Pepsi co brand they can.

People think we will have this one world government, but it'll most likely look more like giant coalitions of trade partners for large chunks of the planet run by technocrats and phony politicians. So basically nothing has changed, it just got bigger and more complicated.

Check out the goals of the World Economic Forum if you want to see where the rich and powerful people want to direct all of humanity.

Working backwards form each of their goals you can see the steps that have been taken throught the years to bring about all the changes needed to enact their plans.

The rich and powerful want more of both. They want it all in fact and the freedom to do as they wish without censor. Unfortunately we will all let it happen because the majority are happy with their structured and relatively safe lives.

a reply to: strongfp

The problem with that form of fascism is that it's peaking as it doesn't survive contact with a crisis with zero redeeming features it lacks the societal standing worth defending.. in our modern age its not done well in the 2007/8 crisis nor the euro crisis nor the migrant crisis and the unpicking the existing societal contracts and identities actually makes their survival near impossible.

worth saying that this why it failed to survive in the crisis of the 1850s, 1890s, 1910s and 1930s and it won't survive now, and it especially won't survive the hubris of the political and media class this winter when people are cold, hungry and angry...

they had their chance post 2007/8 to fix the flaws to the betterment of the societies they operate in but chose to ride in on a cultural war instead..

a reply to: Brigadier

Same as always, empower the rich to get richer. That's about as far as it ever goes.

The NWO is just a bunch of industrialists looking to manipulate the economy for their own ends.

The rest of the stuff you hear is fake conspiracies and doom porn, or people confusing the NWO with other groups.

I love threads like this.

It always gives them more ideas.

Maybe they simply write out us from the story who need`s useless whining eaters when robots and AI can work together with TPTB without any nuisance present

The number 1 goal is population reduction.


People try to argue that they need people to get money. No they don't, the less people you have the more resources for them and they can retain a workforce of slaves / AI. They don't want 95% of the population. Hence the clot shots.

The rich and powerful want more of both. They want it all in fact and the freedom to do as they wish without censor. Unfortunately we will all let it happen because the majority are happy with their structured and relatively safe lives.

a reply to: nickyw

There's two issues I see. One, people are embracing it because it involves not only technology which has made life better and easier, and in entertainment aspect lazy and complacent. But it also involves medical science, education, employment etc. It's a global machine, it's beyond fascism because it involves entities that are almost monastery like in nature, corporations bring much more to the table than a political and elite class.
For example if you're a car person, which established manufacturer do you support? GM, Ford, Toyota?
Branding is important in that sense.

Secondly, traditionally the groups that push back are left leaning in nature, the issue is what identity does any sort of left leaning movement have anymore? It's become a reasonless, emotional, less rational political ideology over time, it's been broken up and left in shambles. Unless we see a huge shift in collective consciousness towards fighting the power structures, the machine will continue to grow.

a reply to: strongfp

some great points but i guess i was a little to brief in my response..

we are in a spacer predicted by liberal icon Belloc in 1910/11 hat he saw was an inevitable merger between socialism corporatism and capitalism that'll lead us back to the Roman positive laws on slavery, or if you will, the kind of neo feudalism the climate activists want implemented.. Orwell used Bellocs work to point to both Nazism and fascism as examples of that outcome in his era, so my use of fascism as a descriptor is simply a reflection of both Belloc and Orwell work, I could have pointed to Nazism but I actually don't think the West is in that space, though if the Chinese camps are true China might well be in that space and places the west as complicit..

In terms of peaking and unintended consequences of the rush to get it all in place is the destruction of safeguarding the vulnerable (old/young/ill) which'll be the universal issue that draws in all political streams as positive laws remove safeguarding and creates the ideal platform for abusers to piggyback in and impose their desires. the scale and scope of emerging scandals are shaping perceptions in the same way the whole "let them eat cake" did for the French aristocrats..

appols for the long winded response..i always fail to distil my meaning down to a few well directed paragraphs..

I think it's a mistake to presume that they have a plan. I bet that they rather like that people see them as these clever and powerful people, when in reality most of them have below average intelligence and have gotten their position through heredity or doing highly immoral acts.
They are blinded by their self-flattery and most of the bad things happen because of their incompetence.

By "they", I mean the ruling class and throughout history the ruling classes have failed for these very same reasons. They get too comfortable and start loving themselves too much, while the people with rough lives will just out evolve them.

a reply to: eitea

certainly framed my thoughts very well.. we can see the unintended consequences of that, i say unintended as the winkers struggle with tiddlywinks let alone any variation of chess..

originally posted by: slatesteam
a reply to: Brigadier

Agenda 2030. UBI. Biometric validation. Vaccine-to-play. EV transportation (so none really) Get rid of sovereign governments by overwhelming nations in a variety of extraordinary and detrimental means.

Hegelian dialectic. Khalergi Plan. Cloward-Piven Strategy. The Wall. Etc. etc.

Basically Orwell’s description of the future.

Already mentioned in the Bible but it is called the Kingdom of the beast in that, not able to buy or sell without the mark of the beast (probably also included use public facility's, travel and tracked every day of your life).

a reply to: strongfp

Rollerball ........

originally posted by: v1rtu0s0
The number 1 goal is population reduction.


People try to argue that they need people to get money. No they don't, the less people you have the more resources for them and they can retain a workforce of slaves / AI. They don't want 95% of the population. Hence the clot shots.

The problem with what you are saying is that the NWO are right wing capitalists, while the people pushing the vax are left wing socialists. Their agendas are diametrically opposed.

The NWO are industrialists and capitalists. They draw their power from the existence of a stable loop of producers and consumers. People produce, they get paid, then they consume, and the NWO skims off the top as the cycle repeats through the difference between the cost of manufacturing and the cost of retail.

If you reduce the population, you reduce the pool of people to produce and the pool of people to consume. You also introduce instability into the markets, which further breaks the loop of production and consumption because people consume less during uncertain times.

During uncertain times people are more likely to turn to leftist ideologies, because they promise to support you if the loop fails. Which in turn also hurts the NWO by reducing their power base.

If you reduce the world's population then you also reduce the value of the world's resources, because scarcity pushes up value. More people = more demand = more power for the NWO. Less people = less demand = less power for the NWO.

10 billion people living in mega city is more the NWO dream than 2 billion living in rural idles.