Something is off

CNN has been caught in so many lies that it was foundering. This is a temporary paradigm shift to recover viewers, maintain profit, and stay alive pending forced social reset.

Think of it as a bandaid to stop hemorrhaging viewers until the government purges alternative narratives and information sources.

Once competition and opposing information sources are silenced, they’ll become the voice of “the state” once more.

All con men and liars do a fast shuffle when the rubes and victims start to recognize “the hustle” - and they’ll do anything to regain enough trust and credibility to revive the scam.

a reply to: SleeperHasAwakened

It's an attempt at mind#ery.

I starred it.

a reply to: StreetGlide

All con men and liars do a fast shuffle when the rubes and victims start to recognize “the hustle” - and they’ll do anything to regain enough trust and credibility to revive the scam.

You can't regain credibility with more than 80% of the same faces that openly hate America still working there.

Too many 'then and now' memes would flood the internet shredding them to pieces.

a reply to: 19Bones79

Nobody is watching cnn thats why

a reply to: 19Bones79

So what strikes me as odd here is that CNN has been quietly cleaning house for a while now.

AT&T is taking out the trash . CNN has been a hoarder of it for years. Gonna take a while.

originally posted by: SleeperHasAwakened

originally posted by: YesTodayTomorrow
I have heard rumours, that the Alliance has taken over CNN. Money from white hate billionaires inc Musk and Liberty Media.

Makes sense if we're gonna get X days of 24/7 rolling documentaries, military courts and live executions.

IMO Musk is still of dubious allegiance, but Liberty Media maybe good guys as they were in with Bernie Ecclestone who is a Putin fan and closet Trump fan. IE he may have sold F1 to Liberty Media because of their relationship and known allies.

BUt then again its all 'smoke n mirrors' - 'disinformation is important' and 'we're watching a movie'...

o_O

The Alliance?

The Rebel Alliance?

I thought their base on Alderon was destroyed? And the one on the ice world Hoth too? Maybe you're right, and they found refuge on Eandor.

Halfway through your post, after the "Musk white hate billionaire" bit, I was confused on whether we were talking about CNN or events following A New Hope.

Perhaps you can clarify which metaverse your post pertains to, because it's a bit hard to follow.

For want of some agreed terminology for what some may call White Hats. I used the word Alliance as some used this terminology. Posts by QStormrider and Benjamin Fulford both pertain to there being an Alliance (good guys) military and gov officials who are making moves behind the scenes of this MSN narrative.

I will try and find the post which actually stated Liberty Media were going to / are buying CNN.

I am usually vague, as I and most others haven't a 'Scooby Doo' as to what's going on - it may well be the Rebel Alliance or that crafty maverick - Yoda.

"Top shareholder of company taking over CNN says that he would like to see the network actually try JOURNALISM"

here is the link re - Take over CNN...

LINK

a reply to: JAGStorm


But why would people listen to the same faces toned down?

They have destroyed their credibility.

originally posted by: Klassified
a reply to: 19Bones79
It will be interesting to see the end result. My guess is they will still lean left, but try to appear much less extremist.

I would say that's about accurate and where they pretty much started before riding the crazy train.

a reply to: YesTodayTomorrow


My bad.

Discovery had to take on a lot of debt when they bought WarnerMedia. So at this point they pretty much have no choice but to cut or overhaul any property that isn't profitable.

Not at all - no worries

a reply to: 19Bones79

originally posted by: 19Bones79
a reply to: JAGStorm


But why would people listen to the same feces toned down?

They have destroyed their credibility.

fixed it for you

Look at the quality of who advertises on CNN vs the Fox advertisers.

Often it's quality over quantity.

There's more to ratings than viewership. It's all about the advertising dollars.


www.adweek.com...

a reply to: olaru12

It's quality that weren't afraid to advertise on CNN throughout the Carrie years..

They weren't concerned about CNN's integrity so much as the fact that people stopped tuning in.

Just a bunch of tone deaf execs that fully committed to wokeness and now crave an aura of rEsPEcTaBiLiTy around their product because of wasted ad revenue.

Not much to respect about that,no matter which way you lean.

originally posted by: 19Bones79

I think Newsom would easily beat him in the next primary, they don't need to point out Joe's flaws and criticize the formula that will only accelerate under Newsom's direction.

With the condition that California is currently in, you think Getty heir, Gavin Newsom, could with the primary, much less the general? The guy putting rapists in women's prisons? The state that has had 250 major company headquarters flee over the last 18 months? The idiot who told everyone to not charge their electric cars a day after signing a bill mandating all cars be electric in a handful of years? I assure you women will not be voting for the guy who evokes memories of American Psycho.

a reply to: DashVol

I hope you're right.

I still think he's the dems top choice at the moment. He breaks a lot of things that then need to be build back better.

And that is exactly what they want in a candidate.

originally posted by: 19Bones79
a reply to: StreetGlide

All con men and liars do a fast shuffle when the rubes and victims start to recognize “the hustle” - and they’ll do anything to regain enough trust and credibility to revive the scam.

You can't regain credibility with more than 80% of the same faces that openly hate America still working there.

Too many 'then and now' memes would flood the internet shredding them to pieces.

I wonder; if a conservative ideologue implemented a right-wing format
how many of the CNN's faces would quit in anger
and how many would turn around and read the teleprompter without pause?

a reply to: ElGoobero


Both scenarios draw terrible conclusions in my mind.

They've screwed the pooch.