Mark Steyn Questions Why Young Healthy People Are Dying Across The UK

a reply to: Kurokage
It could be from anywhere but there are screenshots online if you care to look.

However, you may be right... that it could have been removed because more data has become available, and will be posted very soon.

a reply to: Kurokage

I aksed you where you work and you fail to disclose and that's okay.
Maybe you can understand my biggest fear by telling you mine.

I drive a 53' tractor traler with a GVW maiximum of 86,000
lbs. Imagine the responsibility you have behind that wheel?

Now you toss in all these highly unpredictable vaccine deaths?
Potentially increasing my chances of wiping the concrete with the
blood of babies? God may have mercy on you but I don't think I could.
Not if your defending this poison. The roads are so dangerous and
the stress level goes from zero to maxed out five or six times a day
in normal weather. That's enough to cause heart failure after
so many days in a row. But I'm not looking for any simpathy from you
by any means. And I damn sure don't expect you to think. That is
until you see a dead driver diesel coming at you. Good luck with that.

Just so people know what they may be dealing with.



Pretty GDed important if you ask me.

originally posted by: Itisnowagain
a reply to: Kurokage
What do you think about the change in recommendation, for pregnant women and breast feeding women, on the uk government website?

It's notable that you failed to include link backing up your claim.

Your instantly debunked by the simple fact that the UK government's own website recommends vaxxing for pregnant and breast feeding women. Directly contradicting you.

link

originally posted by: Itisnowagain
a reply to: Kurokage
It could be from anywhere but there are screenshots online if you care to look.

However, you may be right... that it could have been removed because more data has become available, and will be posted very soon.

It was an old document from early on in the vax campaign with a new date at the bottom. The online posts were a hoax.

The current website can be found here.

link

a reply to: AaarghZombies
What do you mean by 'the online posts were a hoax'?
What online posts are you talking about?
Can you provide a link to the website that has the hoax?

a reply to: Itisnowagain

I've not had the chance to check for online screenshots. I will look though.
If you can post a link here, that would be great.

I think what AaarghZombies is saying is that some unscrupulous people have faked/hoaxed certain documents to forward an agenda.

Didn't mean to do it but well worth a double post.

a reply to: karl 12

Not when a search on Twitter looks like it's more fakery...wish I could withdraw the star I stupidly gave your post now!🤣
*Edit* I absolutely agree with the statements in that now deleted tweet though 👍

a reply to: Kurokage
a reply to: AaarghZombies

Copy and paste the below into google.....

Summary of the Public Assessment Report for COVID-19 Vaccine Pfizer/BioNTech
Updated 16 August 2022

Please let me know what you find.

a reply to: Itisnowagain

It's a fake report

BBC

She linked to a report from December 2020

Part of the confusion appeared to stem from the fact that a different part of the same webpage had been updated on 16 August 2022, to include some information about boosters.

But the report about vaccine safety, which social media users highlighted this week, "was not updated", the UK's Medicines & Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) confirmed.

If people who were adverse to the jab actually had real proven data from multiple sources rather than retired crackpots selling a book I honestly would look and take it serious.
It these kind people who are spreading false information thats muddying the waters if any concerning data is actually found

a reply to: Kurokage
A fake report straight from an actual government website that people are supposed to trust.....

So no one can believe anything anymore even if they read it on an official gov.uk website?

And it's still online.

a reply to: Kurokage

If people who were adverse to the jab actually had real proven data from multiple sources rather than retired crackpots selling a book I honestly would look and take it serious.
It these kind people who are spreading false information thats muddying the waters if any concerning data is actually found.

What are you talking about?

originally posted by: karl 12

This Dr Drew?
www.thescottishsun.co.uk...

a reply to: Itisnowagain

Hes making sh# up as usual.

a reply to: Kurokage
If it's fake then who put it on the gov.uk site?
Or is the site fake?

originally posted by: v1rtu0s0
a reply to: Itisnowagain

Hes making sh# up as usual.

He's talking about retired crackpots selling books and data??
I have no idea how it's related.

originally posted by: Itisnowagain

originally posted by: v1rtu0s0
a reply to: Itisnowagain

Hes making sh# up as usual.

He's talking about retired crackpots selling books and data??
I have no idea how it's related.

I've noticed these people all use the same terminology like "crackpot". I still can't figure out if it's a bot

Yes anyone who goes against the narrative is writing a book. There's like a common list of things they pull from. There's gotta be a script somewhere.

originally posted by: BarbaraTheEnlightened1

originally posted by: karl 12

This Dr Drew?
www.thescottishsun.co.uk...

Dr Drew is someone I admire and have conversed many times with on subjects from crystals to reiki to aliens and flat earth but I’m afraid he has no expertise in virology. He’s actually an expert/Dr of Crystals. Shame on you for muddying the doctors good name!