It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Thanks to an ethics loophole, Anita Dunn, a member of the president’s inner circle, does not have to file the public financial disclosure required of every other presidential appointee.
After initially claiming that she would return to SKDK after the campaign, Dunn changed course and became a senior adviser to Biden, one of the most coveted roles in the White House. The role, she told reporters, would only last until summer, at which point she will return to SKDK.
The temporary status allows Dunn to skirt traditional ethics disclosures, which require government officials to make public previous consulting clients, investments, debts, and other potential conflicts of interest. Instead, she was hired into a special, temporary role that keeps her disclosure — and, therefore, her client list at SKDK and any conflicts of interest — out of the public eye.
originally posted by: xuenchen
Dunn has been wreaking havoc for over 40 years, mostly from way way behind the scenes and usually in clandestine settings.
Her "visible" appointed positions and at NGOs are just front window dressing.
A driving force in Political circles (and squares and triangles)😉
If they weren't pushing the 'vaccines' and mandating them , then yes, you would be right. The conflict of interests comes from pushing/mandating the 'vaccines' , as they will profit from higher sales
originally posted by: chr0naut
a reply to: v1rtu0s0
Yes, it is much better to be advised by people who have no subject matter expertise or experience.
Ignorance is strength!
originally posted by: v1rtu0s0
originally posted by: chr0naut
a reply to: v1rtu0s0
Yes, it is much better to be advised by people who have no subject matter expertise or experience.
Ignorance is strength!
OK, Satan.
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: v1rtu0s0
originally posted by: chr0naut
a reply to: v1rtu0s0
Yes, it is much better to be advised by people who have no subject matter expertise or experience.
Ignorance is strength!
OK, Satan.
She disclosed the potential conflict of interest with Pfizer. The linked ethics disclosure form (from November 2021) is that disclosure.
There are 18 other associations that are also potential conflicts of interest and even more investments/sources of income.
originally posted by: v1rtu0s0
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: v1rtu0s0
originally posted by: chr0naut
a reply to: v1rtu0s0
Yes, it is much better to be advised by people who have no subject matter expertise or experience.
Ignorance is strength!
OK, Satan.
She disclosed the potential conflict of interest with Pfizer. The linked ethics disclosure form (from November 2021) is that disclosure.
There are 18 other associations that are also potential conflicts of interest and even more investments/sources of income.
We don't care.
Then maybe she's not all that bad, plus it helps a lot knowing a person's most cherished philosopher. It means somebody who's more familiar with Mao can use his authority to influence her. Mao was a consequence of famine, it's the West that's forced China into this situation.
originally posted by: v1rtu0s0
On a side note, the TGP reported that Anita Dunn made the news for praising Mao, who she says is one of her favorite philosophers.