-@TH3WH17ERABB17- -Q- Questions ---SHALL WE PLAY A GAME ONCE MORE?--- -Part- --41--

PM before he was burned out of his house: I own everything and I am happy.
Sri Lanka PM: "This is how I will make my country rich by 2025"


When it's probably a good idea for you to leave... Summer of Love.

I'm amazed this hasn't been discussed here yet. There is a lot of chatter out there today saying that SCOTUS has overturned the 2020 election with a case that was on a shadow docket. This account that follows Trump is saying as much and I saw one media outlet claiming it as well. They're saying there was a leaked report and the Justices have now been moved into protective custody.

Meanwhile, Trump still hasn't left Alaska. He made it a point to post a "truth" about still being in Anchorage. That seems strange. He doesn't usually advertise his travel plans. But one thing is true, Alaska is about as far away from the potential chaos a person could get inside the US and he's a hop skip and a jump away from international waters. Couple that with the fact that Trump refused questions before leaving for Alaska citing "bad weather."

I'm not trying to get my hopes up here, but I think it's possible the SCOTUS overturned the elections and we are going to find out soon. Maybe tomorrow? They do indeed have cases on shadow dockets from time to time and there were people I consider plugged in claiming they did have an election case to decide back when they were handing down all those other decisions.

mobile.twitter.com...

a reply to: crankyoldman

LOL, things should be interesting at Mika and Joe’s dinner table this weekend ! It’s been a long time since I’ve even checked in on their show, the negativity there was like quick sand There never seemed to be any detectable chemistry between the two of them .

a reply to: PioneerFigureSkating

The election case was: Berger v. North Carolina State Conference of the NAACP, and it had to do with voter ID. As far as what is currently known, there is no "Shadow Case" that had to deal with the 2020 election. Now that doesn't mean that a hold on one didn't happen for safety reasons, but it does mean that if one does exist then nobody would know about it until it's released. So, unless a case in known then it would be impossible to know if it exists or not.

If there was a "Shadow Case" about overturning the 2020 election and people knew about due to another leak, then the media would be all over it trying to discredit the sources.

originally posted by: Guyfriday
a reply to: PioneerFigureSkating

The election case was: Berger v. North Carolina State Conference of the NAACP, and it had to do with voter ID. As far as what is currently known, there is no "Shadow Case" that had to deal with the 2020 election. Now that doesn't mean that a hold on one didn't happen for safety reasons, but it does mean that if one does exist then nobody would know about it until it's released. So, unless a case in known then it would be impossible to know if it exists or not.

If there was a "Shadow Case" about overturning the 2020 election and people knew about due to another leak, then the media would be all over it trying to discredit the sources.

I disagree. I feel like the media wouldn't touch that with a 10' pole. Instead, if it were true, they would be scrambling trying to come up with some sort of major distraction.

a reply to: Thoughtful1

T1, ... I AM SO MIFFED! Catturd2 won't let me buy a beanie from the UK!

I actually tried to buy half a dozen for nephews and nieces at Christmas. I mailed and did get a polite reply saying that it was just too time consuming to deal with overseas shipping.

Gutted!



To save space:

SPREADSHEET UPDATE - July 10th

KU V22.76 100722 to 4953 incl DECODE tools

Notes
1) KU Posts and usual tweet accounts updated and rolled through to decode tabs,
2) I have added tabs for tweets from @TomFitton and from @NathanielCJRothschild, (+6000 tweets total),
3) I've found a further 1000 old tweets of Elon Musk going back to Nov 2020 but have a gap between Mar 6 '21 and Apr 14 '22,
4) Currently keeping track of 26 Twitter accounts in the spreadsheet and have reached 169,500 tweets.

Some odd COMMS from @papitrumpo in this video tweet from the Anchorage Rally.
Timestamp: Jul 10 2022 16:41:23 EST
Video length: 1:27

So basically DJT makes a big thing about a tshirt a guy in the audience is wearing: "I want that shirt" (3 times).

He invites the guy on stage and his wife comes too in a similar shirt. as they leave the stage he says:
" I WANT THAT SHIRT!!! I want BOTH of them! Take those shirts off now, and give them to me!"

1) This is referencing an IDIOM

take the shirt off (one's) back

To unscrupulously take large quantities of money from one and cause one hardship. Those contractors will take the shirt off your back if you hire them. I mean, I paid them an exorbitant amount for shoddy work.

I think he's saying he's ready to use his Exec Orders (such as EO13848) to fleece the cabal/deepstate and leave them with nothing?

From the video length... #127

Anonymous ID: NOjYqEdl No.148457032 📁
Nov 7 2017 19:05:59 (EST)
The graphic is your key.
Let's pause and say hello to the rogue intelligence agencies currently monitoring these threads.
Was the money worth it?
Titanic.
Q

Bolded timestamp encodes July 11th, twice!


Now think about this in the context of if the SC has overturned the election, POTUS45 is currently President, and the proof of CIA involvement in Frankfurt, in the election fraud becomes public... he could use the EOs to take their public AND black budgets AND their Assets... "even the shirt off their backs"?

a reply to: carewemust

Can there be any doubt?
files.abovetopsecret.com...

What’s the message with Roscosmos’ satellite images of...

One story that fascinated me during the past week was this story of Russia's space agency, Roscosmos, releasing satellite imagery of western "decision centers" during the G7 conference and the NATO summit in Madrid, attended by western "leaders" such as Boris Johnson, and alleged US President "Biden". It was a clear message, but exactly what was that message? I believe that to decode it, one has to look at the images themselves:

Warning: Roscosmos Releases Satellite Imagery Of Decision Centers Ahead Of NATO - Foreign Affairs

The article, you'll note, contains seven large images, and in order from top to bottom, they are:

(1) Madrid, the site of the NATO meeting;

(2) Washington, DC, with various landmarks including the White House, Supreme Court, US Capitol, and Washington monuments clearly visible;

(3) Another view of Washington DC, of the Pentagon including the "ground zero" garden and park in the center of the structure clearly visible;

(4) London, with a view of Westminster and the now-famous giant ferris wheel;

(5) Central Paris along the Champs Elysee with all the associated famous landmarks;

(6) Brussels, with the EU headquarters clearly shown, and finally,

(7) Berlin, with the Reichstag and Brandenburg Gate clearly visible in the center-right, and lower-center right.

All your "decision centers" belong to us. Some interesting speculation by Dr. Farrell over at The Giza Death Star.

Madrid: 40.467798, -3.617423
White House: 38.897542, -77.036505
Pentagon: 38.870960, -77.055935
London: 51.503049, -0.127727
France: 48.870433, 2.316842
Germany: 52.519903, 13.368921
Belgium: 50.879986, 4.425771

a reply to: PioneerFigureSkating

PFS, you may have missed that I discussed it here.

originally posted by: FlyingFox
a reply to: carewemust

Can there be any doubt?
files.abovetopsecret.com...

Sure does look like the same dog Barack Obama is holding.
Which certainly leads to a seemingly inescapable conclusion about who those 2 black girls are.

Have you guys heard this chatter yet??
SERIES OF EXPLOSIONS IN ROME, VATICAN OBELISK IN VATICAN SQUARE
www.bitchute.com...

a reply to: Menesses

Not seen in the live cam feed. AS SEEN HERE
Do you have any other links?

a reply to: Menesses

From yesterday: Rome, the fire in Centocelle is a coincidence: explosions, flames and smoke. Gualtieri: “Attack on the Capital”

a reply to: crankyoldman

Bannon doesn't fear the results of 100 battles because he knows his enemy, and also knows himself.

originally posted by: RelSciHistItSufi
a reply to: PioneerFigureSkating

PFS, you may have missed that I discussed it here.

Oh, I see it now, Sufi. My bad. I read through the thread as soon as I got up this afternoon and I hadn't had any caffeine yet. 😂 🍻

twitter.com...

They do love their hexagons.

From the JWST mission Countdown:


My expectation bar was just lowered.

@NorthropGrumman

a reply to: MountainLaurel

The show is past it's peak....

a reply to: PioneerFigureSkating

NO bad PFS... just drawing you to it's contents.

originally posted by: PioneerFigureSkating

originally posted by: Guyfriday
a reply to: PioneerFigureSkating

The election case was: Berger v. North Carolina State Conference of the NAACP, and it had to do with voter ID. As far as what is currently known, there is no "Shadow Case" that had to deal with the 2020 election. Now that doesn't mean that a hold on one didn't happen for safety reasons, but it does mean that if one does exist then nobody would know about it until it's released. So, unless a case in known then it would be impossible to know if it exists or not.

If there was a "Shadow Case" about overturning the 2020 election and people knew about due to another leak, then the media would be all over it trying to discredit the sources.

I disagree. I feel like the media wouldn't touch that with a 10' pole. Instead, if it were true, they would be scrambling trying to come up with some sort of major distraction.

Maybe the RvW leak was a counter intel op to make Democrats believe they had a reliable source inside the court.