BREAKING: Nancy's Commission EDITED The Video Evidence To Support Her Claims! EVIL.

They edited out the footage of US veteran Ashley babbot and rosane boyland. So magically it now looks like they did not shoot and kill any unarmed woman but of course they perpetuate the idea that there was a lot of voilence from the protesters

This is Pelosi's Jan 6th hearing in action.

Is anyone surprised? I dont think.

Is anyone disgusted?


Bi-partisan question: Anyone think this is a correct hearing now that you know this?

Spam

a reply to: everyone

I didn’t watch the video, I don’t need to watch it to know the Dems are nothing but lying con artists.
It’s their way of life, they strive to con as many people as they can 24/7/365.
Anyone with more than 2 brain cells knows this, their 0 brain cell supporters eat it up.

a reply to: everyone

Off course I'm not surprised. Rules for thee but not for me , age old the same old .
They get away , literally, with murder , while we slowly lose our amendments

originally posted by: everyone
Anyone think this is a correct hearing now that you know this?

That ship sailed a while back.

I watched a lot of footage and read a lot of material from different people in different sectors.

There are certainly some people that deserve punishment for what they're proven to have done. It's an embarrassment that people's mere presence during this has been allowed to be a crime without bond. It's disgusting and when the tides turn and the other side is suffering this it's going to be very hard to feel much sympathy. Kiss the boot, now choke on it.

There is no reasonable person that can say there isn't a gross disparity from how much more violent and protracted riots were handled. It's shameful. That people in Congress are capable of being this vicious to ruin people's lives is despicable. They've done more damage to our country in their tenures than all those people on January 6th could do in three lifetimes.

originally posted by: RazorV66
a reply to: everyone

I didn’t watch the video, I don’t need to watch it to know the Dems are nothing but lying con artists.
It’s their way of life, they strive to con as many people as they can 24/7/365.
Anyone with more than 2 brain cells knows this, their 0 brain cell supporters eat it up.

There are the ones who cant connect 2 dots together i agree. There are also a lot of the people of the kind with rainbow hari and what not that know exactly that they are perpetuating lies, Like those mules. They knew exactly what they where doing.

a reply to: everyone

I figured out the primary difference between a "hearing" and a "trial"; a hearing has only a prosecution, and no defense. Also, ANYthing can be said -- there is no rule of order, no voir dire, no evidentiary procedure, because it's all just a performance.

originally posted by: everyone

originally posted by: RazorV66
a reply to: everyone

I didn’t watch the video, I don’t need to watch it to know the Dems are nothing but lying con artists.
It’s their way of life, they strive to con as many people as they can 24/7/365.
Anyone with more than 2 brain cells knows this, their 0 brain cell supporters eat it up.

There are the ones who cant connect 2 dots together i agree. There are also a lot of the people of the kind with rainbow hari and what not that know exactly that they are perpetuating lies, Like those mules. They knew exactly what they where doing.

I absolutely agree there are some Dem slackies that are in on the con game.
Then there are some that know they are supporting con artists but they just don’t care about it.

Even for a hearing, doesn't this fall under contempt of Congress and/or Federal evidence tampering?

Both rank somewhat above hand-slap level, IIRC.

originally posted by: argentus
a reply to: everyone

I figured out the primary difference between a "hearing" and a "trial"; a hearing has only a prosecution, and no defense. Also, ANYthing can be said -- there is no rule of order, no voir dire, no evidentiary procedure, because it's all just a performance.

The current Democratic goverment would not want to let any anoying defense or jury to get in the way of lies of course. All the more easier to manipulate any evidence this way. As they do.

This is the definition of a kangaroo court if you ask me.

a reply to: Ksihkehe

I wholeheartely agree. This way by 2024 we will have no U.S anymore as they coroded the constitution so much it will effectively not exist anymore.

Uh, wow. You do realize that was the very first of the broadcasts? You think that was all they have? There are a lot of videos. Not just one that included Babbit. You do know that right?

Better buckle up buttercup! We have at least 4-6 more viewings ahead.

a reply to: everyone

This is the definition of a kangaroo court if you ask me.

I DO ask you, and I agree with your assessment. All of the testimony presented in this 'hearing' has been heard and assessed long ago. The Democrats have had more than a year to compile their data, but it is not really data or evidence that we are seeing. Nope. It is personal testimony and video which has been edited to provide the most dire picture of what happened that day.

The Democrats -- cowards that they are -- don't DARE have a trial. Nope. That would involve a proper defense, which would crush their views. So, this 'hearing' will continue, aptly timed to occur around the primaries. I think it will backfire on them. Instead of causing middle America to think less of the right, I think it will cause them to pull together against the radical left. That is purely my opinion.

a reply to: argentus

The whole GOP senators preemptively seeking pardons was new info. The names coming soon besides Perry from PA will be interesting. Not sure what day we get that. The previous days unauthorized tour info will be coming soon as well. Not sure what the other days will bring.

What was said in the depositions is all new. We knew people were deposed, not what they testified to.

I also had not seen the Hannity text to Kayleigh McEnany about a plan to stop talking about a stolen election and possibly invoking the 25th amendment or impeachingTrump as well.

You didn't watch the video because you know it will show what they are telling you it will. And even after seeing the video, you will not accept what you are seeing. You are already convinced, even though someone is willing to show you the evidence.

Boy, I sure wish the Republicans could do this with all the voter fraud they claim. SHOW ME!

I am happy to see it all. The best part so far for me was Bill Barr telling Trump that the whole voter fraud issue was "bull#". Three times he did.

Now, go ahead and vilify Barr and tell me Bill Barr is another political hack. When at one time, he's was a Saviour.

a reply to: RazorV66

originally posted by: everyone
a reply to: Ksihkehe

I wholeheartely agree. This way by 2024 we will have no U.S anymore as they coroded the constitution so much it will effectively not exist anymore.

agreed.

these morons have no idea what might happen if they keep it up.



i've seen his vids before and i liked them.

in this vid he quotes Oswald spengler and his 1918 book alot

i was surprised how on he was 100+ yrs ago about a lot of stuff going on right now.