The magic is gone for Disney investors, CNN upset

originally posted by: M5xaz

originally posted by: spacedoubt
a reply to: M5xaz

Good job.
I suggest therapy possibly

Or maybe just stop sexualizing children.
Not a good look.

Matt Gaetz anyone?
Donald Trump anyone? ( this dude loved hanging out with underage girls in their dressing rooms, and suggested that he would date his own daughter if he were younger, his daughter )
Mark Foley messing with pages and congressional aides ( teenage girls that he propositioned) he resigned.

Shall I go on?
Dennis Hastert abusing high school wrestlers.

Shall I continue?

Like I said, you are projecting, as are many other freaks in the newest offshoot of the gop. The Ones that invented pizzagate as a cover for their unnatural attraction to children.

The projection is YOURS.

YOU/the left are pushing for these "sex ed" for toddlers, NOT ME, Not the Right.

Again, do what you want with YOUR own kids and leave OTHER people's kids alone.
( Eventually, your kids will be old enough to testify in court if need be...)

YOUR obsession with "sex ed" for toddlers, OTHER people's kids is abnormal.

www.zerohedge.com...

We agree on sexualizing young people is an awful thing
We disagree on who the hippocrites are.

originally posted by: MiddleInsite
Disney is evolving. If you don't like it, don't go. Don't rent their movies. Don't stream their services. Don't buy their crap.

Problem solved.

How bout stop defending the sexual EXPLOITATION of CHILDREN.

Effing CHILDREN for effs sake.

Any company that does that deserves to go bankrupt.

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: M5xaz

All normal parents do.

If that were the case we wouldn't be seeing 1 in 20 girls and 1 in 20 boys being sexually abused.

Parents are usually the last to know, and the last to believe their trusted friend, relative, coworker, neighbor would harm their children.

If you had shyte parents, that's YOUR problem.

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: M5xaz

All normal parents do.

If that were the case we wouldn't be seeing 1 in 20 girls and 1 in 20 boys being sexually abused.

Parents are usually the last to know, and the last to believe their trusted friend, relative, coworker, neighbor would harm their children.

Clearing up a typo I made ^^ :

1 in 5 girls and 1 in 20 boys is a victim of child sexual abuse;

victimsofcrime.org...

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: xuenchen

Arrogantly dictating authoritarian and ambiguous policies to teachers is not going to stop one single child molester.

💎☝🏼

Right. That's why we have the problem and some laws are changing roflmao 💎

originally posted by: M5xaz

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: M5xaz

All normal parents do.

If that were the case we wouldn't be seeing 1 in 20 girls and 1 in 20 boys being sexually abused.

Parents are usually the last to know, and the last to believe their trusted friend, relative, coworker, neighbor would harm their children.

If you had shyte parents, that's YOUR problem.

"Shyte parents" = deserve to be sexually abused.
Maybe some people just shouldn't have been born, eh?

originally posted by: Sookiechacha

originally posted by: M5xaz

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: M5xaz

All normal parents do.

If that were the case we wouldn't be seeing 1 in 20 girls and 1 in 20 boys being sexually abused.

Parents are usually the last to know, and the last to believe their trusted friend, relative, coworker, neighbor would harm their children.

If you had shyte parents, that's YOUR problem.

"Shyte parents" = deserve to be sexually abused.
Maybe some people just shouldn't have been born, eh?

Your words, not mine

And you are the one that supports abortion, not me.


Just don't you dare blame me, or my good parents for the actions/inactions of shyte parents.

Well, apparently this may not go according to plan. The link provides a lot of information, none good for the Govenors plan, but here's a few snippets.

As Florida legislators were rushing through passage of a bill to repeal the special district that governs Walt Disney World last week, they failed to notice an obscure provision in state law that says the state could not do what legislators were doing — unless the district’s bond debt was paid off. Disney, however, noticed and quietly sent a note to its investors to show that it was confident the Legislature’s attempt to dissolve the special taxing district operating the 39-square mile parcel it owned in two counties violated the “pledge” the state made when it enacted the district in 1967, and therefore was not legal. The result, Disney told its investors, is that it would continue to go about business as usual.

“They could try to argue that this pledge was invalid, that they could not contract it away,’’ Schumer said. “I don’t think that would work. But states usually aren’t in the business of arguing that their own promises are bad.” The state could also pass a different law which acknowledges Disney’s right to the bonds and then take the assets using its eminent domain powers and pay off the bondholders using those assets, he said. But that poses another problem for the state, Randolph said. By giving Disney a year to resolve this, the company could shed its assets by giving its power plant and its water utility to Lake Buena Vista and Bay Lake. Without those assets, Disney reduces its tax bill when the state dissolves Reedy Creek, he said. “Disney has more power now to determine its tax bill than it did a week ago,’’ he said. “That’s what’s crazy to me. They want to punish Disney, but this is the furthest thing from that. You literally put them in the driver’s seat of how much they want to pay.”

Miami Herald

ETA: I will find the link, but I also read there is a clause in the bond agreement that does not allow it to be prepaid, so the earliest it could be dissolved is 2029. Was this just theater, or did no one do any research before passing the law?