Texas woman, 26, charged with murder over ‘self-induced abortion’

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: TzarChasm

I did not.

$10,000 reward for narcing on abortion patients

The Friday announcement by the Department of Health and Human Services comes in response to the Texas law—which took effect Sept. 1—that bans most abortions in the state after six weeks of pregnancy, without exceptions for rape or incest. That law also allows members of the public to sue abortion providers suspected of breaking the law and provides for bounties of $10,000 per illegal procedure.

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: Sookiechacha

I'll need to wait until I have more information before I can have an opinion on this one.

Im so proud of you right now.

If it was a nurse who reported her, man, thats F'ed.

It is, however, if a pregnant patient tested positive for, say, meth, the hospital has an obligation to report her.

There's a lot we don't know about this case.

a reply to: Sookiechacha

And, Roe V Wade is still the law of the land until SCOTUS says it isn't, not Texas.

That statement is false.
The case was about the Constitutional viability of a Federal law against abortion in general
For gosh sake , please research BEFORE you post .

a reply to: TzarChasm

I get the law. Just not sure how to feel about hospitals doing the reporting.

Also, dont like this narcing law btw

originally posted by: TzarChasm

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: TzarChasm

I did not.

$10,000 reward for narcing on abortion patients

Abortion patients are NOT the target of the bill. Those who assist abortion patients are. This woman was arrested and charged for deliberately self inducing er own abortion. There's nothing in this story about anyone who may have assisted her, at all.

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: TzarChasm

I get the law. Just not sure how to feel about hospitals doing the reporting.

Also, dont like this narcing law btw

You would be correct in surmising that hospitals don't receive the reward but any individual at the hospital can turn a profit.

a reply to: Sookiechacha

I'm aware. My comments about the article are on the previous page. This 2016 bill is a separate animal to be tranq'ed and humanely disposed of. I imagine the individual heard the rumors of this self inflicted operation and saw their get-rich-quick opportunity because getting paid to exhibit strong Christian values is a win win.

a reply to: Gothmog

The case was about the Constitutional viability of a Federal law against abortion in general

What? The Texas case? No, it isn't/wasn't. Maybe you're thinking of the Mississippi case that SCOTUS has yet to rule on.

a reply to: Xcalibur254

Killed a child owned by god. Tisk tisk tisk

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: Xcalibur254

Killed a child owned by god. Tisk tisk tisk

Owned? In what sense? Do we still own people in this country?

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: Gothmog

The case was about the Constitutional viability of a Federal law against abortion in general

What? The Texas case? No, it isn't/wasn't. Maybe you're thinking of the Mississippi case that SCOTUS has yet to rule on.

No . Roe vs. Wade .
Please try to catch up and read with comprehension .

Denying ignorance .
Why ?
Some folks think they know what they don't know .

Really need to reinstitute Godwins Law as an automatic you lost the argument standard.

Yall need to ease up on the ISM's they have no meaning anymore, and no impact even when its an accurate comparison.

If you have a problem with texas based on a legal argument, make it about legality or constitutionality dont cop out with nazism, racisim, chauvanism etc.

a reply to: Gothmog

Gave you a star for manners. I hope you didn't pull a muscle.

The Texas women should have gone to California for her abortion, now she will think twice next time.

originally posted by: TzarChasm
a reply to: Gothmog

Gave you a star for manners. I hope you didn't pull a muscle.

I do use sarcasm sometimes .

a reply to: Xcalibur254

It's a sad state of affairs when the pursuit of basic human rights for unborn humans is called Nazi-esque.

As a female I am pro abortion and that is that, people do not like it that is their problem no mine.

But beside that, I can not seem to grasp how Conservatives love to own the woman body, while liberals seems to want to eradicate the females of the species and install she males to take the role.

I just do not know if I should laugh or just cry.

Genetical females has always been under attack by the genetical males in the world.

We should demand males to be replace to.

originally posted by: marg6043
The Texas women should have gone to California for her abortion, now she will think twice next time.

Or just any hospital in Texas as long as she wasn't past the limit set by law there.

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: Xcalibur254

It's a sad state of affairs when the pursuit of basic human rights for unborn humans is called Nazi-esque.

Would you report your neighbor for receiving or self operating on their abortion for the bounty or do it for free?