Bombshell - Covid-19 Shares 19 Letter Sequence That Matches Moderna Patent From 2016

originally posted by: AaarghZombies
a reply to: neutronflux

In that a virus became rampant in a city that happens to do research on coronavirus that happens to have a sequence that allows for gain of function from past research to kick off the first pandemic of this magnitude in about a 100 years. With how many covid pandemics before covid 19? Then China allowed people to travel out of China to spread covid 19, some sea wall.

The lab was put there to research coronavirus in the local bat population. So it's chicken rather than egg.

Gain of function research was denied funding and never actually carried out at that lab.

There have been multiple coronavirus outbreaks, Sara and mers are just two examples..

China stopped its own nationals from leaving. It was foreign nationals governments who let covid in. For example in the US they refused to quarentine anyone retuning from China unless they were visably sick.

Can you tell me how bats from 1500 miles away infected a city but failed to infect anyone else on there way to the city?

Thanks bud, I’ll hang up and listen to the answer.

originally posted by: AaarghZombies

originally posted by: flice

originally posted by: AaarghZombies
a reply to: v1rtu0s0

Yawn.

This simply adds weight to the argument that covid is naturally occurring.

All they've done is found that it's genetically similar to a strain of coronavirus that was previously identified I horseshoe bat's in China and Vietnam during the 2010s.

Your simply trying to twist something that we already know to make it sound like doom porn.

The odds that you quote vanish once you take I to consideration that it might be a close relative of covid 19, as they only apply to a virus evolving those characteristics independently. The odds are much better once you consider a common ancestry.

And from the Wuhan labs own research from that time, it shows that those SPECIFIC bats only live around 1.500 km from Wuhan.
The Wuhan bats do not carry those genes.

So there is only one way those bats got to Wuhan and that the spread started there.......

Bats... Can fly.

It took several years to reach wuhan and mutated at least twice on the way.

Did your mother have any children that lived.

originally posted by: AaarghZombies

originally posted by: neutronflux
a reply to: AaarghZombies

You

Gain of function research was denied funding and never actually carried out at that lab.

NIH admits US funded gain-of-function in Wuhan — despite Fauci’s denials
nypost.com...

May 1, 2020 5:50 pm

The Newsweek report revealed an alarming tidbit: The Wuhan lab at the center of the controversy had for years been engaged in gain-of-function research. What exactly is it? It’s a line of research where scientists take viruses and study how they might be modified to become deadlier or more transmissible. Why would they do this? Scientists who engage in such research say it helps them figure out which viruses threaten people so they can design countermeasures.

www.vox.com...

Dude, why do you have to lie to kick it…

The people who wrote those articles were wrong. Plain and simple. They aren't scientists and they mistakenly called something entirely different Gain of Function.

What is being described dies not meet the criteria of gain of function. Fauci corrected this in Congress.

It's like AOC calling anything that look similar to an Ar15 an assault rifle, even if its bolt action or airsoft. She said it, but she does not know what she's talking about, so liberals can cite her all they like and she's still wrong.

The real definition or the one they recently changed the definition of?

originally posted by: iwanttobelieve70

originally posted by: AaarghZombies

originally posted by: neutronflux
a reply to: AaarghZombies

You

Gain of function research was denied funding and never actually carried out at that lab.

NIH admits US funded gain-of-function in Wuhan — despite Fauci’s denials
nypost.com...

May 1, 2020 5:50 pm

The Newsweek report revealed an alarming tidbit: The Wuhan lab at the center of the controversy had for years been engaged in gain-of-function research. What exactly is it? It’s a line of research where scientists take viruses and study how they might be modified to become deadlier or more transmissible. Why would they do this? Scientists who engage in such research say it helps them figure out which viruses threaten people so they can design countermeasures.

www.vox.com...

Dude, why do you have to lie to kick it…

The people who wrote those articles were wrong. Plain and simple. They aren't scientists and they mistakenly called something entirely different Gain of Function.

What is being described dies not meet the criteria of gain of function. Fauci corrected this in Congress.

It's like AOC calling anything that look similar to an Ar15 an assault rifle, even if its bolt action or airsoft. She said it, but she does not know what she's talking about, so liberals can cite her all they like and she's still wrong.

The real definition or the one they recently changed the definition of?

The one they changed the definition of. Just like they changed the definition of "vaccine." If you change the definition, it makes you right. Because it's a new definition, duh.

No no no no...

They didnt fly. The populations stick pretty much around where they are found.
They are also very much different from each other.

More or less like dogs can look different.

The populations have their own terretories so to speak and hardly mingle.

Again, the specific bats Wuhan lab was researching and found to carry the transmissible virus was 1500 km from Wuhan.

The bats pictured as being sold at the wet market looksNOTHING like the Wuhan bats. It would be like comparing a chihuahua to a labrador.

Why are you defending the previous official narrative?

Even the British government is now acknowledging the Lab leak / release.

The people you trust... have #ed you and all of us over. Grow the # up and deal with it.

originally posted by: flice
No no no no...

They didnt fly. The populations stick pretty much around where they are found.
They are also very much different from each other.

More or less like dogs can look different.

The populations have their own terretories so to speak and hardly mingle.

Again, the specific bats Wuhan lab was researching and found to carry the transmissible virus was 1500 km from Wuhan.

The bats pictured as being sold at the wet market looksNOTHING like the Wuhan bats. It would be like comparing a chihuahua to a labrador.

Why are you defending the previous official narrative?

Even the British government is now acknowledging the Lab leak / release.

The people you trust... have #ed you and all of us over. Grow the # up and deal with it.

Dude, the bat flew 1500 miles and had sex with a pig outside Wuhan’s front door who then sneezed on an employee’s face sparking a pandemic at faucie’s lab that coincidentally was doing gain of function research on the exact same thing at just the right time to get Biden elected.

Come on man!

originally posted by: AaarghZombies

originally posted by: v1rtu0s0

originally posted by: neutronflux
a reply to: AaarghZombies

What. To afraid to quote your “sources” funded by China….

Hes posting big pharma funded fact checkers and articles that are over a year old that parrot the fauci narrative.

Even a broken clock is right twice a day.

Remind me again, wasn't it you who started threads say that the Vax made you magnetic, that masks would starve children of oxygen, or that the vax contained Graphene?

What was you're latest one, oh, yes, that the queen of England was taking anti-parasitic for Covid.

Compared to you, Big Pharma is mother Theresa.

Tony isn't getting his $ out of you. Attacking the messenger won't erase the facts.
Gain of Function (the old definition) is what they were doing in Wuhan, even if you don't want that to be true. The NIH admitted it.

www.msn.com... PNb5m

A top NIH official admitted in a Wednesday letter that U.S. taxpayers funded gain-of-function research on bat coronaviruses in Wuhan and revealed that EcoHealth Alliance, the U.S. non-profit that funneled NIH money to the Wuhan Institute of Virology, was not transparent about the work it was doing.

and here is many other sources for you.

duckduckgo.com...

My advise is bring much better lies with you if you choose to lick boots this hard.

a reply to: iwanttobelieve70

In the next episode of the simpsons 😅 !❤

a reply to: v1rtu0s0

i don't know how this can be a shock to anyone

this was clearly an engineered virus

that's why i think the PTB hit the panic button i think they thought it was going to be a lot worse than it was, or maybe hoped it to be.

a reply to: AaarghZombies

Great name! It fits you perfectly...

originally posted by: Tekner

originally posted by: network dude

originally posted by: AaarghZombies
a reply to: v1rtu0s0

Yawn.

This simply adds weight to the argument that covid is naturally occurring.

All they've done is found that it's genetically similar to a strain of coronavirus that was previously identified I horseshoe bat's in China and Vietnam during the 2010s.

Your simply trying to twist something that we already know to make it sound like doom porn.

The odds that you quote vanish once you take I to consideration that it might be a close relative of covid 19, as they only apply to a virus evolving those characteristics independently. The odds are much better once you consider a common ancestry.

Your handlers must be very proud. Your persistence is noted, and I'm sure a promotion is in your future. I don't go down the "Paid Shill" road often, but when enough evidence emerges, and the boots have all been licked clean, there really is no other way to go.

Persistent, yes. Convincing? LOL. If getting picked apart every thread is his goal then yes maybe a promotion is in order. I have a feeling he comes here to act retarded for free though.

Wouldn't be much of an "act" then, would it?

There was never any doubt it came from a lab. Anything else belongs in the hoax bin.

originally posted by: neutronflux
a reply to: AaarghZombies

You

The people who wrote those articles were wrong. Plain and simple.

Have any evidence or logically structured argument they are wrong other than your blind because your head is stuck up big governments a$$?

Because fauci told congress after they changed the definition of gain of function. Seeing any patterns here? AZ is a partisan puppet. Don’t mind him.

originally posted by: AaarghZombies

This isn't new, we've hypothesised this for well over a year now. It's a virus previously found in horseshoe bat's in China and Vietnam. There are two known strains which were in circulation prior to the first known human infection. Which again illustrates that this virus is not man made.

The OP's own source debunks itself, you just need to understand the data to see this.

None of this rules out that the virus was not leaked from a lab at the Wuhan Institute of Virology where they were mostly studying and playing around with it. Even China has dropped the whole came from a bat in the wet market story.

originally posted by: Xtrozero

originally posted by: AaarghZombies

This isn't new, we've hypothesised this for well over a year now. It's a virus previously found in horseshoe bat's in China and Vietnam. There are two known strains which were in circulation prior to the first known human infection. Which again illustrates that this virus is not man made.

The OP's own source debunks itself, you just need to understand the data to see this.

None of this rules out that the virus was not leaked from a lab at the Wuhan Institute of Virology where they were mostly studying and playing around with it. Even China has dropped the whole came from a bat in the wet market story.

I think leaked is being a bit conservative at this point. I think the proper term is released.

originally posted by: v1rtu0s0

I think leaked is being a bit conservative at this point. I think the proper term is released.

Maybe, maybe not. The lab was known to have poor procedures for the level it was. China quickly destroyed it and all evidence AFTER the fact. If it was on purpose then they would not have released it 200 yards from where they produced it and then back peddling for a year in some massive damage control event.

originally posted by: Xtrozero

originally posted by: v1rtu0s0

I think leaked is being a bit conservative at this point. I think the proper term is released.

Maybe, maybe not. The lab was known to have poor procedures for the level it was. China quickly destroyed it and all evidence AFTER the fact. If it was on purpose then they would not have released it 200 yards from where they produced it and then back peddling for a year in some massive damage control event.

Event 201 happened right before the "lab leak." What are the odds? What are the odds that there are multple plans to start a pandemic and use it as a vehicle for a new world order like operation lockstep, and then it happens? What are the odds.

The number of coincidences is staggering.

originally posted by: v1rtu0s0

Event 201 happened right before the "lab leak." What are the odds? What are the odds that there are multple plans to start a pandemic and use it as a vehicle for a new world order like operation lockstep, and then it happens? What are the odds.

The number of coincidences is staggering.

Once again, if on purpose I can think of 100 other ways to do it better and not do it right at where my level 4 lab is...lol

It came from the lab and was an oh # moment for them. We will need to agree to disagree

originally posted by: Xtrozero

originally posted by: v1rtu0s0

Event 201 happened right before the "lab leak." What are the odds? What are the odds that there are multple plans to start a pandemic and use it as a vehicle for a new world order like operation lockstep, and then it happens? What are the odds.

The number of coincidences is staggering.

Once again, if on purpose I can think of 100 other ways to do it better and not do it right at where my level 4 lab is...lol

It came from the lab and was an oh # moment for them. We will need to agree to disagree

So you think releasing it somewhere else is less obvious than the "lab leak" release?

a reply to: iwanttobelieve70

Can you tell me how bats from 1500 miles away infected a city but failed to infect anyone else on there way to the city?

Yes, yes I can. This is actually one of the easier parts of the pandemic to deal with because it fits a pretty mundane pattern.

We started out with a bat virus, 5 or 6 years ago. This virus spread among various bat populations in central southern China up to Central China for several years without being noticed because it couldn't infect humans at this time. It then spread to an intermediate species. For example, pigs, where it either mutated into a form that could infect humans through random mutation, or it came into contact with another virus that could infect both humans and whatever animal it was, and gained the ability to infect humans through recombination (Brief explanation)

We know that there were two core variants of the virus at this time due to samples taken in the area around Wuhan, which is how we know that it didn't escape from a lab.

The virus then spread among local towns but didn't get recorded because it kills fewer than 1.3% of all people that it infects. Which in a small town is maybe a couple of grandparents. And this would have been during flu season so Covid could easily have infected people without authorities becoming aware.

It then spread to the wet market in Wuhan, where it turned into a super spreader event. But local authorities covered it up because they were afraid of being blamed. They tired to contain and you know the rest.

Here are some links explaining some of the epidemiology and the genomic aspects of the pandemic.

Link
Link