Bombshell - Covid-19 Shares 19 Letter Sequence That Matches Moderna Patent From 2016

Before you assume this is a coincidence, researchers claim there's a 1 in 3 trillion chance that this sequence from Moderna's patent would randomly occur in nature. 12 of the 19 letter sequence matches the furin cleavage site that allows Covid-19 to gain function and specifically infect human cells. Prior to Covid-19, there has never been a coronavirus pandemic.

Frontier of Virology published the study which found the matching 19 letter sequence out of 3,300 letters of Moderna's patented code.

“The absence of CTCCTCGGCGGGCACGTAG from any eukaryotic or viral genome in the BLAST database makes recombination in an intermediate host an unlikely explanation for its presence in SARS-CoV-2"

Video breakdown:



Some scientists claim this isn't enough evidence to prove the virus is lab made, however, when the intercept sent a FOIA request, the NIH redacted over 90% of the pages related to the involvement with WIV labs.

SOURCE

PDF SOURCE

I had this in my recent post as a secondary note on lab origins.

I feel like this, if true, is very strong scientific evidence pointing to origins other than zoonotic/natural of Covid 19. I don't know how they spin this? Ignore it most likely.

a reply to: v1rtu0s0

Ignore it. Like ignoring people with real intelligence

Beyond obvious since the beginning but good luck with leading horses to water.

originally posted by: EmmanuelGoldstein
Beyond obvious since the beginning but good luck with leading horses to water.

For people who have been awake, and have common sense. I think most of us knew what was going on since 2020.

a reply to: v1rtu0s0

To be honest I really find this stuff quite amazing. On the face of it, it should be the biggest headline across the planet, engineered plandemic and the S should HTF. But no, it's get's something along the lines of, meh. It's the same with old mate from fizzer when he admitted that the injections don't work, what do we get, people rushing out to get a third whack and a massive push to get it into kids ...... seriously #ing clownworld.

a reply to: v1rtu0s0

Yawn.

This simply adds weight to the argument that covid is naturally occurring.

All they've done is found that it's genetically similar to a strain of coronavirus that was previously identified I horseshoe bat's in China and Vietnam during the 2010s.

Your simply trying to twist something that we already know to make it sound like doom porn.

The odds that you quote vanish once you take I to consideration that it might be a close relative of covid 19, as they only apply to a virus evolving those characteristics independently. The odds are much better once you consider a common ancestry.

a reply to: AaarghZombies

This simply adds weight to the argument that covid is naturally occurring.

Yawn

Youre really horrible at trying to tell people they arent seeing EXACTLY what they are actually seeing

1/10 rating for disinfo agent youre really bad at this

a reply to: AaarghZombies

Stewart answered: "A chance? Oh my God there's a novel respiratory coronavirus overtaking Wuhan China what do we do? Oh, you know who we could ask: the Wuhan Novel Respiratory Coronavirus Lab – the disease is the same name as the lab."

m.jpost.com...

Lots of coincidences…. Very odd…

a reply to: v1rtu0s0

Good post.
I remembered reading an article about the mysterious furin cleavage sites:
The origin of SARS-CoV-2 furin cleavage site remains a mystery

In the article it is noted:
(The Rat line is the bat line)

The origin of this strain is linked to the emergence of the novel furin cleavage site in the viral spike glycoprotein.

So, the furin sites are somewhat unique.

The analysis of the phylogeny of these three strains showed that the first to diverge was the pangolin coronavirus, with the RatG13 being the closest. However, when only the spike is analyzed, there is a high similarity between the pangolin CoV, RaTG13 and SARS-CoV-2...
They found three coronaviruses that were very similar to the SARS-CoV-2 at the genomic level. These are Pangolin-CoVs (2017, 2019), Bat-SARS-like (CoVZC45, CoVZXC21) and bat RatG13...
This may indicate the occurrence of recombination events between the Pangolin-CoV (2017) and RatG13 ancestors.

If these connections are valid, then there may be more evidence of laboratory origin found in the Pangolin strains.

It is strange that pop-culture eerily mirrors reality at times. In their 'Pandemic Special', South park jokes of covid coming from having sex with a bat and a pangolin.
From the plot synopsis on Wikipedia:

A news report reveals that the pandemic's origins were traced to a bat in Wuhan, which prompts a flashback to Randy's visit to China, during which he and Mickey Mouse had sex with a bat. Realizing that they are responsible for the outbreak, Randy is overcome with guilt. A later news report reveals that the source was instead determined to be a pangolin, with which Randy and Mickey also had sex.

en.m.wikipedia.org...
Strange coincidence?

originally posted by: neutronflux
a reply to: AaarghZombies

Stewart answered: "A chance? Oh my God there's a novel respiratory coronavirus overtaking Wuhan China what do we do? Oh, you know who we could ask: the Wuhan Novel Respiratory Coronavirus Lab – the disease is the same name as the lab."

m.jpost.com...

Lots of coincidences…. Very odd…

No, it's not a coincidence, that lab was built there specifically because the area is rife with things like this in nature.

Building a sea wall does not cause high tides.

originally posted by: ManBehindTheMask
a reply to: AaarghZombies

This simply adds weight to the argument that covid is naturally occurring.

Yawn

Youre really horrible at trying to tell people they arent seeing EXACTLY what they are actually seeing

1/10 rating for disinfo agent youre really bad at this

Maybe you should speak to the op about that.

It's not a matter of seeing, it's a matter of understanding.

The op has a bad history of taking things and then claiming that they mean the opposite in the hope that people will get outrage without actually understanding what is going on.

What we have here is evidence that covid 19 is related to a known natural family of coronavirus, and that the odds of it being so similar without being related are marginal at best.

This isn't new, we've hypothesised this for well over a year now. It's a virus previously found in horseshoe bat's in China and Vietnam. There are two known strains which were in circulation prior to the first known human infection. Which again illustrates that this virus is not man made.

The OP's own source debunks itself, you just need to understand the data to see this.

I get embarrassed for you when I read your posts !! You are really stupid or ignorant.. I’d say both but I’d be guessing.

originally posted by: Scotchjimmy
I get embarrassed for you when I read your posts !! You are really stupid or ignorant.. I’d say both but I’d be guessing.

It’s amazing what people do for money.

originally posted by: AaarghZombies
a reply to: v1rtu0s0

Yawn.

This simply adds weight to the argument that covid is naturally occurring.

All they've done is found that it's genetically similar to a strain of coronavirus that was previously identified I horseshoe bat's in China and Vietnam during the 2010s.

Your simply trying to twist something that we already know to make it sound like doom porn.

The odds that you quote vanish once you take I to consideration that it might be a close relative of covid 19, as they only apply to a virus evolving those characteristics independently. The odds are much better once you consider a common ancestry.

And from the Wuhan labs own research from that time, it shows that those SPECIFIC bats only live around 1.500 km from Wuhan.
The Wuhan bats do not carry those genes.

So there is only one way those bats got to Wuhan and that the spread started there.......

originally posted by: AaarghZombies

originally posted by: neutronflux
a reply to: AaarghZombies

Stewart answered: "A chance? Oh my God there's a novel respiratory coronavirus overtaking Wuhan China what do we do? Oh, you know who we could ask: the Wuhan Novel Respiratory Coronavirus Lab – the disease is the same name as the lab."

m.jpost.com...

Lots of coincidences…. Very odd…

No, it's not a coincidence, that lab was built there specifically because the area is rife with things like this in nature.

Building a sea wall does not cause high tides.

In that a virus became rampant in a city that happens to do research on coronavirus that happens to have a sequence that allows for gain of function from past research to kick off the first pandemic of this magnitude in about a 100 years. With how many covid pandemics before covid 19? Then China allowed people to travel out of China to spread covid 19, some sea wall.

Anyway,

Bill Gates warns of smallpox terror attacks as he seeks research funds

news.yahoo.com...

Where is the next sea wall….

How do you go from

www.dailymail.co.uk...

More evidence Covid was tinkered with in a lab?

Now scientists find virus contains tiny chunk of DNA that matches sequence patented by Moderna THREE YEARS before pandemic began

To…….

Moderna posts billions in profit from COVID-19 vaccine but won’t share technology

www.doctorswithoutborders.org...

a reply to: neutronflux

In that a virus became rampant in a city that happens to do research on coronavirus that happens to have a sequence that allows for gain of function from past research to kick off the first pandemic of this magnitude in about a 100 years. With how many covid pandemics before covid 19? Then China allowed people to travel out of China to spread covid 19, some sea wall.

The lab was put there to research coronavirus in the local bat population. So it's chicken rather than egg.

Gain of function research was denied funding and never actually carried out at that lab.

There have been multiple coronavirus outbreaks, Sara and mers are just two examples..

China stopped its own nationals from leaving. It was foreign nationals governments who let covid in. For example in the US they refused to quarentine anyone retuning from China unless they were visably sick.

a reply to: AaarghZombies

You

Gain of function research was denied funding and never actually carried out at that lab.

NIH admits US funded gain-of-function in Wuhan — despite Fauci’s denials
nypost.com...

May 1, 2020 5:50 pm

The Newsweek report revealed an alarming tidbit: The Wuhan lab at the center of the controversy had for years been engaged in gain-of-function research. What exactly is it? It’s a line of research where scientists take viruses and study how they might be modified to become deadlier or more transmissible. Why would they do this? Scientists who engage in such research say it helps them figure out which viruses threaten people so they can design countermeasures.

www.vox.com...

Dude, why do you have to lie to kick it…

a reply to: neutronflux

Exactly...

Stay level headed, don't look at sides, look at data.

Ask:

- How on Earth could anyone suddenly go from developing a publishing a vaccine in 1 year, when it previously could take as much as 10 years?

- Who lost face and money on their non-starter vaccine in 2011 when we face sars-cov-1?

- Who lost money on the 2014 non-event regarding the flu?

- Who has been proven to make the most of the situation during Covid?

- Ask yourself... is the ROI "fair". Profits... that's AFTER the bills has been paid.

- Ask how it is that specific bats, that only live 1.500 km from Wuhan, the only bats to carry the gene making them able to transmit to humans, suddenly end up infecting people in Wuhan?


There are only two options:
- Bat virus escaped from the Wuhan lab (human error)
- Bat virus was released in Wuhan by.... someone.

FACTS:
- Wuhan Lab sars-cov research was funded by EcoHealth in the US.
- EcoHealth was funded for infectious disease development by NIH

Seriously, I mean, how many damn co-incidences do you need?

Wake the F up..........

Now add on top the kids vs vaccine issue.

In Denmark kids vaccines are normally under heavy research criteria before they are added to the program.
The HPV vaccine was in phase 3 for 4 years (counting 40.000 individuals in the entire world). Not till that research showed that the vaccine was safe was it added and offered to the kids here.

Enter Covid vaccine.... sure, it's safe and well tested in under 1 year. Our head of the Danish FDA went on kids tv and said that directly to them?!?!?! That's freaking manipulation.

So, why was the kids vaccine pushed so hard as well?

Because of two things:

1. The Emergency use of the covid vaccines makes it impossible for ANYONE to receive ANY kind of compensation due to damages or death from the vaccine. Once the emergency use is over, it will have to be approved correctly, and then liability comes into question.
The pharma companies need as many kids as possible to subscripe, because when the kiddies start suffering from heart attacks and VAIDS, they have clean hands and wont have to pay for damages.

2. It will be easier for local FDAs to admit the trial vaccines, once approved, to enter the local programs... because, "you already took it and agree upon it... so... tough luck."


Ask yourselves:
- Why passively aggressively force parents and kids to get the kids vaccinated when:

1. Kids rarely have complications with Covid.
2. The vaccines don't protect against transmission.
3. If John, age 81, has had his vaccine, how does that protect him more from dying, that someone else is vaccinated? If the vaccine is safe... and works... well, you can't really come and say that "by work I mean only work if you also have it, because then it doesn't work, because then it's only providing mitigation against severity.
4. And guess what.... we already had cheaper products to mitigate severity that we didn't use, because...... contracts.

Ah yes, we also have to remember those contracts.

The contracts signed by governments with pharmas, forces governments to commit to the orders 100%.
As such, even if we found out that product X did a pretty damn good job at keeping people alive during hospitalization, we couldn't use it, because we opted in to the vaccine solution.
The money had been pledged....

So what we had was governments, who were advised by idiots, both sides reacting in panic, and bought into the idea put forth from pharma, putting them in a spot where they had to keep sailing down this river of fear from public retribution over spending that much money on bull# products made by the same people who most likely were the ones to oooops it into society or actually release it on purpose.

How the hell do you own up to that as a politician and authority figure? I mean... those people don't really have any life skills besides that "job"

They would have to crash and burn their entire career to admit they were wrong or were accomplices to the pharma industry.

That's why they pushed so hard, even though it was not necessary. They simply had no choice... (from their point of view)

And this is where media lost all credibility, because there are no objective media outlets anymore.
They will always, always, always be either political or privately driven.

Never driven from the basis of communicating facts or data. (notice how I didn't use the word truth, because truth is always weighed in the eyes of the beholder)

a reply to: AaarghZombies

NO... that is factually WRONG.

If by local you meant entire China, then yes, but "local"... could easily be interpreted as "Wuhan" or "just around Wuhan".

When in fact the Wuhan lab was all over the place to research and collect samples.

Again... the bats when the ability to transmit to humans live 1.500 km from Wuhan. This is fact.