posted on Feb, 16 2022 @ 07:13 PM
originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: vNex92
60% protection against a germ that will only rarely put you in the hospital.
There is a break-even point where the vaccine is more dangerous than Covid-19. Still waiting on a study to demonstrate what that point is, for a few
individual physical-condition/age combinations.
That's the thing. BEFORE the vaccines, the survival rate was 99.9% + for low risk groups, and 99.5% for all groups including high risk. That's
including the 95% of "covid deaths" that had an average of 4 comorbidities. Only 5% had solely covid as a cause. If we took out those 95%, what would
be the survival rate then? 99.99%?
Secondly, a lot of people have recovered from Covid and have natural immunity. What percent is their survival if they get reinfected? Probably
Thirdly, Covid a la Omicron appears to have mutated to less deadly.
Fourth, health officials now admit that the vaccines do not stop infection and transmission, the entire argument for the vaccine mandates and pushes,
especially for low risk individuals. "Protect grandma." They also acknowledge that the vaccines appear to not be as effective for new variants.
Therefore, these doctors and leaders pushing these mandates and fear I think have to be compromised. If as a doctor or let's say a leading health
institute they cannot assess a cogent cost-benefit analysis of the benefit of covid policies versus negative impact of these policies, and understand
they may be net negative, then they have lost legitimacy. Most medicines even say on the package "your doctor has assessed that this medicine has more
benefit than harm for you."
edit on 16-2-2022 by Madviking because: (no reason given)