Life Insurer Refuses To Cover Vaccine Death

originally posted by: Snarl
a reply to: americanbuffalo1

I believe we're beginning to see the Ponzi scheme unravel.

Whose been playing?
The Education Industry
The Insurance Industry
The Pharmaceuticals Industry
The Physician's Industry
The NGO Industry
The Green Industry
The Science Industry
Every government that's a friend of the World's Reserve Currency

How far is that list gonna go on?

As far as I'm concerned it just gets longer and longer.
Is there any institution on the planet which hasn't been corrupted to some degree?

originally posted by: Edumakated
Wait till a policy denies insurance claim because death was an "act of war".

Wait a sec ...

In Canada, there is a 2 year contestability and suicide clause. After the 2 years it becomes a unilateral contract where the only party that can make material changes to the contract is the policy holder. This policy would pay out in Canada.

a reply to: marg6043

* See my reply above here..👍

The insurance company is not wrong. He volunteered to be experimented on.

originally posted by: 1947boomer

originally posted by: Snarl
I can't attest to the veracity of this Source, but I can tell you I've been waiting for this shoe to drop for awhile.

An explosive case is currently being hotly debated on social media: In France, a rich, older entrepreneur from Paris is said to have died as a result of a Corona injection. Previously, he had taken out multi-million dollar life insurance policies for the benefit of his children and grandchildren, according to a media report.

Although vaccination is recognized as the cause of death by doctors and the insurance company, it has refused to pay out. The reason is because the side effects of the Corona jabs are known and published. They argue that the deceased took part in an experiment at his own risk. Covid-19 in itself is not classed as a “critical illness”.

I don't know if you actually read the article. Did you see the part where it said:

"The court recognizes the classification of the insurer who, in view of the announced side effects, including death, legally regards participation in the phase three experiment, whose proven harmlessness is not given, as voluntarily taking a fatal risk that is not covered by the contract...."?

He was voluntarily participating in a phase three trial with informed consent; he wasn't taking a vaccine that had successfully gone through the trials and been approved (even for an emergency use authorization). Once a vaccine has gone through an approval process, it is no longer legally 'experimental' (even though a lot of *MEMBERS* on ATS like to misuse that term). The approving agency is essentially validating that there are known benefits and risks to using the vaccine after the phase three experiment is over, which is why it is not excluded from life insurance coverage from that point on, at least in the US.

I don't know how it is in France, but in the US, taking an approved vaccine is not cause to nullify a life insurance policy.

www.prnewswire.com... 246667.htmlFrom American Council of Life Insurers, March 12, 2021:

[...]

“A social media post appears to be behind the spread of entirely false information, suggesting a COVID-19 vaccine could be a factor a life insurer considers in the claims-paying process.

“The fact is that life insurers do not consider whether or not a policyholder has received a COVID vaccine when deciding whether to pay a claim.

[...]

IMPORTANT: Using Content From Other Websites on ATS
Posting work written by others

Community Announcement re: Decorum

Was the “vaccine” made safer or changed in any way after the phase 3 trials?

If not this sounds like an easy out for the insurance company. I wonder if the person had closer monitoring after the jab than those who have taken it since?

Safe and effective ya?

originally posted by: Snarl
I can't believe there is not one comment on this thread. LMFAO

How many of you out there are gonna make your next life insurance premium payment? Do ya think it's money down the drain?

I was wondering about this myself after the insurance company released their report last week or the week before. They make decisions based on these numbers.

How long before blood and organs will be rejected from the vaxed and boosted?

a reply to: 1947boomer

If cominarty is approved and available how do the other vaccines exist under the EUA. A stipulation for an EUA is no other viable treatments?

, or unapproved uses of approved medical products in an emergency to diagnose, treat, or prevent serious or life-threatening diseases or conditions when certain statutory criteria have been met, including that there are no adequate, approved, and available alternatives.

www.fda.gov...


If the approved licensed drug is not the one being administered then people are still taking vaccines under the EUA like people on ATS have been saying.

originally posted by: Snarl
I can't believe there is not one comment on this thread. LMFAO

How many of you out there are gonna make your next life insurance premium payment? Do ya think it's money down the drain?

But but but Obamacare 😢

This is a big deal, government makes you take it then 💩 goes wrong then your dead and your family is doomed.., and insult to injury they view it as suicide.

Omicron that 🖕

originally posted by: Soloprotocol
The insurance company is not wrong. He volunteered to be experimented on.

I suppose “the government made me do it.” Isn’t a valid excuse?

Then watch them NOT pay out on an unvaccinated person who died from covid......because they could have mitigated their illness by taking a vaccine.

I agree with the insurance company.

That being said I don’t agree with insurance in general.

Buy the ticket, take the ride.

a reply to: Snarl