Leaked Texts PROVE Trump Circle Tried To STOP Capitol Riot

originally posted by: Ghostsdogood

originally posted by: jimmyx
BLM didn’t participate in overthrowing the government… apparently that’s not a problem for you as you seem to want a dictatorship

Please tell us about the democrat's antifa department and their 5 day effort to take the whitehouse with explosives.

Do you know how to do anything other than lie on behalf of democrat party fascists?

Apparently not.

What the hell are you talking about, I can’t take you seriously.

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2

originally posted by: Ghostsdogood

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: Ghostsdogood

"We"? "Us"? Interesting.

Bit tired of your angry accusations of lying about anyone who "dares" to disagree with you.

Peace. And Happy (non angry) New Year.

Cheers!

🥃😉

Meaning..

You are upset that your lies are no longer going unchallenged.

Have you found a SINGLE example that the democrat's newly fabricated exec priv 'rule' has ever existed before they invented it to use against Trump yet as you so forcefully, and dishonestly claimed?

Of course not.


How about sticking to the truth?

You know, the same reality that everyone else lives in.



Are you just jumping in here to dishonestly distract from facts that hurt your Feelz?

Which of them was I in ANY way incorrect about?

Which of them are democrats NOT lying about?

Ah. More accusations of my supposedly "lying". About what?

As you have not even bothered to read the Judgment, come back to me when you have.

Am tired of your angry and unpleasant rhetoric.

Happy New Year.

And please, stop shouting in capitals at other posters?


They ain't deaf.

"Feelz"?

Is that the sort of insult that passes for reasoned debate over the Pond?

Peace and Out.

Lies upon lies.

There is not now, nor has ever been an expiration of exec priv at end of term.

YOU keep claiming that the above statement is incorrect.

But are not able to provide a SINGLE hint of an example on our 200+ year history.

Because it does not exist.

Because democrats fabricated it this year.

And you are dutifully repeating their lies.


Enough with your whiney distraction attempts.

Show us that example.

originally posted by: Ghostsdogood

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2

originally posted by: Ghostsdogood

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: Ghostsdogood

"We"? "Us"? Interesting.

Bit tired of your angry accusations of lying about anyone who "dares" to disagree with you.

Peace. And Happy (non angry) New Year.

Cheers!

🥃😉

Meaning..

You are upset that your lies are no longer going unchallenged.

Have you found a SINGLE example that the democrat's newly fabricated exec priv 'rule' has ever existed before they invented it to use against Trump yet as you so forcefully, and dishonestly claimed?

Of course not.


How about sticking to the truth?

You know, the same reality that everyone else lives in.



Are you just jumping in here to dishonestly distract from facts that hurt your Feelz?

Which of them was I in ANY way incorrect about?

Which of them are democrats NOT lying about?

Ah. More accusations of my supposedly "lying". About what?

As you have not even bothered to read the Judgment, come back to me when you have.

Am tired of your angry and unpleasant rhetoric.

Happy New Year.

And please, stop shouting in capitals at other posters?


They ain't deaf.

"Feelz"?

Is that the sort of insult that passes for reasoned debate over the Pond?

Peace and Out.

Lies upon lies.

There is not now, nor has ever been an expiration of exec priv at end of term.

YOU keep claiming that the above statement is incorrect.

But are not able to provide a SINGLE hint of an example on our 200+ year history.

Because it does not exist.

Because democrats fabricated it this year.

And you are dutifully repeating their lies.


Enough with your whiney distraction attempts.

Show us that example.

Errm, I did. It's in the Judgment. That you still haven't bothered to read.

That's it.

You keep calling people that disagree with you liars.

ATTENTION:
KNOCK OFF THE TIT FOR TAT AND PERSONAL ATTACKS! OR BE POSTING BANNED!

You are not in the Mud Pit. Move on if you can't debate this topic in a civil manner.

Do not reply to this warning.

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2

originally posted by: Ghostsdogood

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2

originally posted by: Ghostsdogood

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: Ghostsdogood

"We"? "Us"? Interesting.

Bit tired of your angry accusations of lying about anyone who "dares" to disagree with you.

Peace. And Happy (non angry) New Year.

Cheers!

🥃😉

Meaning..

You are upset that your lies are no longer going unchallenged.

Have you found a SINGLE example that the democrat's newly fabricated exec priv 'rule' has ever existed before they invented it to use against Trump yet as you so forcefully, and dishonestly claimed?

Of course not.


How about sticking to the truth?

You know, the same reality that everyone else lives in.



Are you just jumping in here to dishonestly distract from facts that hurt your Feelz?

Which of them was I in ANY way incorrect about?

Which of them are democrats NOT lying about?

Ah. More accusations of my supposedly "lying". About what?

As you have not even bothered to read the Judgment, come back to me when you have.

Am tired of your angry and unpleasant rhetoric.

Happy New Year.

And please, stop shouting in capitals at other posters?


They ain't deaf.

"Feelz"?

Is that the sort of insult that passes for reasoned debate over the Pond?

Peace and Out.

Lies upon lies.

There is not now, nor has ever been an expiration of exec priv at end of term.

YOU keep claiming that the above statement is incorrect.

But are not able to provide a SINGLE hint of an example on our 200+ year history.

Because it does not exist.

Because democrats fabricated it this year.

And you are dutifully repeating their lies.


Enough with your whiney distraction attempts.

Show us that example.

Errm, I did. It's in the Judgment. That you still haven't bothered to read.

That's it.

You keep calling people that disagree with you liars.

I have had enough of your angry trollish attitude.

Happy Christmas and off you go.

The judgement was written by one of those democrat liars.

THIS YEAR.

Still not a single example of what you so forcefully and dishonestly claim.

And STILL no explanation for why ALL former presidents are STILL asserting the same executive privilege that you, nancy, and this judge insist expired at the end of their terms.

STILL just deceptive just lie & run tactics, with subtle little insults while hiding behind T&C.

I'll STILL be waiting for a SINGLE example to justify your lies on this subject.

Holidays or not.

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2

originally posted by: Ghostsdogood

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2

originally posted by: Ghostsdogood

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2

originally posted by: Ghostsdogood

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: Ghostsdogood

"We"? "Us"? Interesting.

Bit tired of your angry accusations of lying about anyone who "dares" to disagree with you.

Peace. And Happy (non angry) New Year.

Cheers!

🥃😉

Meaning..

You are upset that your lies are no longer going unchallenged.

Have you found a SINGLE example that the democrat's newly fabricated exec priv 'rule' has ever existed before they invented it to use against Trump yet as you so forcefully, and dishonestly claimed?

Of course not.


How about sticking to the truth?

You know, the same reality that everyone else lives in.



Are you just jumping in here to dishonestly distract from facts that hurt your Feelz?

Which of them was I in ANY way incorrect about?

Which of them are democrats NOT lying about?

Ah. More accusations of my supposedly "lying". About what?

As you have not even bothered to read the Judgment, come back to me when you have.

Am tired of your angry and unpleasant rhetoric.

Happy New Year.

And please, stop shouting in capitals at other posters?


They ain't deaf.

"Feelz"?

Is that the sort of insult that passes for reasoned debate over the Pond?

Peace and Out.

Lies upon lies.

There is not now, nor has ever been an expiration of exec priv at end of term.

YOU keep claiming that the above statement is incorrect.

But are not able to provide a SINGLE hint of an example on our 200+ year history.

Because it does not exist.

Because democrats fabricated it this year.

And you are dutifully repeating their lies.


Enough with your whiney distraction attempts.

Show us that example.

Errm, I did. It's in the Judgment. That you still haven't bothered to read.

That's it.

You keep calling people that disagree with you liars.

I have had enough of your angry trollish attitude.

Happy Christmas and off you go.

The judgement was written by one of those democrat liars.

THIS YEAR.

Still not a single example of what you so forcefully and dishonestly claim.

And STILL no explanation for why ALL former presidents are STILL asserting the same executive privilege that you, nancy, and this judge insist expired at the end of their terms.

STILL just deceptive just lie & run tactics, with subtle little insults while hiding behind T&C.

I'll STILL be waiting for a SINGLE example to justify your lies on this subject.

Holidays or not.

So, STILL not a single example to justify this lie?

originally posted by: Ghostsdogood

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2

originally posted by: Ghostsdogood

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2

originally posted by: Ghostsdogood

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2

originally posted by: Ghostsdogood

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: Ghostsdogood

"We"? "Us"? Interesting.

Bit tired of your angry accusations of lying about anyone who "dares" to disagree with you.

Peace. And Happy (non angry) New Year.

Cheers!

🥃😉

Meaning..

You are upset that your lies are no longer going unchallenged.

Have you found a SINGLE example that the democrat's newly fabricated exec priv 'rule' has ever existed before they invented it to use against Trump yet as you so forcefully, and dishonestly claimed?

Of course not.


How about sticking to the truth?

You know, the same reality that everyone else lives in.



Are you just jumping in here to dishonestly distract from facts that hurt your Feelz?

Which of them was I in ANY way incorrect about?

Which of them are democrats NOT lying about?

Ah. More accusations of my supposedly "lying". About what?

As you have not even bothered to read the Judgment, come back to me when you have.

Am tired of your angry and unpleasant rhetoric.

Happy New Year.

And please, stop shouting in capitals at other posters?


They ain't deaf.

"Feelz"?

Is that the sort of insult that passes for reasoned debate over the Pond?

Peace and Out.

Lies upon lies.

There is not now, nor has ever been an expiration of exec priv at end of term.

YOU keep claiming that the above statement is incorrect.

But are not able to provide a SINGLE hint of an example on our 200+ year history.

Because it does not exist.

Because democrats fabricated it this year.

And you are dutifully repeating their lies.


Enough with your whiney distraction attempts.

Show us that example.

Errm, I did. It's in the Judgment. That you still haven't bothered to read.

That's it.

You keep calling people that disagree with you liars.

I have had enough of your angry trollish attitude.

Happy Christmas and off you go.

The judgement was written by one of those democrat liars.

THIS YEAR.

Still not a single example of what you so forcefully and dishonestly claim.

And STILL no explanation for why ALL former presidents are STILL asserting the same executive privilege that you, nancy, and this judge insist expired at the end of their terms.

STILL just deceptive just lie & run tactics, with subtle little insults while hiding behind T&C.

I'll STILL be waiting for a SINGLE example to justify your lies on this subject.

Holidays or not.

So, STILL not a single example to justify this lie?

originally posted by: Ghostsdogood

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2

originally posted by: Ghostsdogood

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2

originally posted by: Ghostsdogood

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: Ghostsdogood

"We"? "Us"? Interesting.

Bit tired of your angry accusations of lying about anyone who "dares" to disagree with you.

Peace. And Happy (non angry) New Year.

Cheers!

🥃😉

Meaning..

You are upset that your lies are no longer going unchallenged.

Have you found a SINGLE example that the democrat's newly fabricated exec priv 'rule' has ever existed before they invented it to use against Trump yet as you so forcefully, and dishonestly claimed?

Of course not.


How about sticking to the truth?

You know, the same reality that everyone else lives in.



Are you just jumping in here to dishonestly distract from facts that hurt your Feelz?

Which of them was I in ANY way incorrect about?

Which of them are democrats NOT lying about?

Ah. More accusations of my supposedly "lying". About what?

As you have not even bothered to read the Judgment, come back to me when you have.

Am tired of your angry and unpleasant rhetoric.

Happy New Year.

And please, stop shouting in capitals at other posters?


They ain't deaf.

"Feelz"?

Is that the sort of insult that passes for reasoned debate over the Pond?

Peace and Out.

Lies upon lies.

There is not now, nor has ever been an expiration of exec priv at end of term.

YOU keep claiming that the above statement is incorrect.

But are not able to provide a SINGLE hint of an example on our 200+ year history.

Because it does not exist.

Because democrats fabricated it this year.

And you are dutifully repeating their lies.


Enough with your whiney distraction attempts.

Show us that example.

Errm, I did. It's in the Judgment. That you still haven't bothered to read.

That's it.

You keep calling people that disagree with you liars.

I have had enough of your angry trollish attitude.

Happy Christmas and off you go.

The judgement was written by one of those democrat liars.

THIS YEAR.

Still not a single example of what you so forcefully and dishonestly claim.

And STILL no explanation for why ALL former presidents are STILL asserting the same executive privilege that you, nancy, and this judge insist expired at the end of their terms.

STILL just deceptive just lie & run tactics, with subtle little insults while hiding behind T&C.

I'll STILL be waiting for a SINGLE example to justify your lies on this subject.

Holidays or not.

a reply to: Oldcarpy2

Did the same thing to me. Insisting I never answered with proof, then just yelling "LIES" while never posting links to his/ her claims. And claiming this is what a "Fearless Patriot" does.

I just had to finally stop responding. I'm all for a good debate but it just got ridiculous.

originally posted by: frogs453
a reply to: Oldcarpy2

Did the same thing to me. Insisting I never answered with proof, then just yelling "LIES" while never posting links to his/ her claims. And claiming this is what a "Fearless Patriot" does.

I just had to finally stop responding. I'm all for a good debate but it just got ridiculous.

So exactly WHERE is that single example of this imaginary rule having existed before democrats wanted to use it against Trump this year?

And where is a single explanation as to why all other former presidents are immune from this fairy tale of a rule?


Excellent effort to distract from the fact that no example exists though.

a reply to: jimmyx

Youve forgotten CHAZ and the burning of a federal building.

originally posted by: jimmyx

originally posted by: Ghostsdogood

originally posted by: jimmyx
BLM didn’t participate in overthrowing the government… apparently that’s not a problem for you as you seem to want a dictatorship

Please tell us about the democrat's antifa department and their 5 day effort to take the whitehouse with explosives.

Do you know how to do anything other than lie on behalf of democrat party fascists?

Apparently not.

What the hell are you talking about, I can’t take you seriously.

So the democrat's Antifa department attacking the whitehouse for 5 straight nights went right down the memory hole?

But you still complain about how Trump held his bible after clearing the democrat terrorists from Lafayette Park.

Somewhere, 300 seriously injured federal agents from those attacks are extremely offended.

a reply to: xuenchen
The people at the capital thought they were stopping a coup. Many consider them heros and feel Trump should have done more, because of the suspected election fraud, that millions believe occured to this very day.

originally posted by: 0NSL4U6T

originally posted by: Ghostsdogood
a reply to: frogs453


You have refuted NOTHING.

You only attempted to belittle by calling me delusional and upset.

Gonna lie about this too?

Pathetic.

I made MANY specific claims about your specific lies.

The only one you even questioned was whether Trump requested NG BEFORE j6.

You now have links with BOTH sides saying that was the case.

You lied.

Intentionally.


Wanna try refuting another of my claims?

You are delusional and upset. You have not proven the poster lies and you are doing what every far righter supporter does when confronted with facts, You scream LIES or FAKE NEWS without actually doing anything but b**ch and moan,

You would rather believe the propaganda and the lies spread by the far right than live in reality.

The poster made repeated, forceful claims that executive privilege expires at the end of term, and always has.

The democrat's latest lie on this subject.

While IGNORING the fact that this imaginary rule never applied to ANY other other former president.

And ignoring repeated requests to back up his absurd claims in ANY way.


Nice try with 'propaganda of the right'.

Isn't going to change the facts above.

NO such rule ever existed until democrats fabricated the idea this year that it had actually always existed and nobody noticed.

Absurd.

And 100% untruthful attempt by democrats.

a reply to: Karen657

He was asking for them to audit the results and ‘find’ where cheating occured. That was obvious to those of us not blinded by wishful thinking theyve finally caught the bad man in a trap and now they gonna make him fly.

originally posted by: Ghostsdogood

originally posted by: frogs453
a reply to: Oldcarpy2

Did the same thing to me. Insisting I never answered with proof, then just yelling "LIES" while never posting links to his/ her claims. And claiming this is what a "Fearless Patriot" does.

I just had to finally stop responding. I'm all for a good debate but it just got ridiculous.

So exactly WHERE is that single example of this imaginary rule having existed before democrats wanted to use it against Trump this year?

And where is a single explanation as to why all other former presidents are immune from this fairy tale of a rule?


Excellent effort to distract from the fact that no example exists though.

Well, if you bothered to read the Judgment I posted?

Nixon?

Even?

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2

originally posted by: Ghostsdogood

originally posted by: frogs453
a reply to: Oldcarpy2

Did the same thing to me. Insisting I never answered with proof, then just yelling "LIES" while never posting links to his/ her claims. And claiming this is what a "Fearless Patriot" does.

I just had to finally stop responding. I'm all for a good debate but it just got ridiculous.

So exactly WHERE is that single example of this imaginary rule having existed before democrats wanted to use it against Trump this year?

And where is a single explanation as to why all other former presidents are immune from this fairy tale of a rule?


Excellent effort to distract from the fact that no example exists though.

Well, if you bothered to read the Judgment I posted?

Nixon?

Even?

Nice strawman attempt.

NONE of the issues, or even arguments in the Nixon cases had ANYTHING to do with exec priv expiring at the end of the president's term.

They had to do with when proper law enforcement investigations were allowed to pierce that priviledge.

With a search warrant.

Trying to fool someone?

Expiration of exec priv wasn't even a topic in the cases.

Nixon was STILL president at the time!

How dishonest.

Don't you work in the legal profession somewhere?

Why the continued deception?



I officially respond to your strawman by referring you to scotus 1984 case of Mickey Mouse vs Goofy.