It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
I originally found this forum through a group that was setting up a self sufficient community out in the wilds. Professionals and experts who wanted to escape from all ... all of this ... and to just get away and live how they wanted to live without having to worry about all of the politics and the division.
originally posted by: thebtheb
South Africa just announced, no vaccine, no grocery store, as has one province in India.
Germany just announced lockdown of the unvaccinated, as has Austria.
Covid has a roughly 0.3% death rate. ANYONE, vaxxed or not, can transmit Covid. In fact on the CDC's own site, was a study showing that it's likely vaxxed have a HIGHER viral load in their mouths and noses.
If people can't see that something very wrong is happening, I ask you to reconsider your astonishment, your dismissal of what's in front of your eyes, your inability to fathom that something terrible is happening.
Because if you don't, it won't matter if you're vaxxed or not, you'll be a prisoner too.
originally posted by: AaarghZombies
originally posted by: thebtheb
originally posted by: AaarghZombies
originally posted by: thebtheb
Covid has a roughly 0.3% death rate
Covid has a 1.6% death rate, and a considerably higher rate of long term sickness such as reduced lung function and heart disease.
My sources are in my signature.
No, covid does NOT have a 1.6% death rate. It varies across ages. 75 and above WITH comorbidities, it's about 3%. The lower your age is, the more that goes down until you get to 30 and under where the death rate is so small it's literally more dangerous to get the flu. This FACT is reflected in the number of child deaths of covid compared to deaths from flu in different years, in almost every country.
But even if it were a 3% death rate. So what? None of my views would change anyway. 97% chance of surviving = pretty damn good! It's not Ebola for God's sake.
1.6% across the population. My sources are in my signature.
originally posted by: AaarghZombies
a reply to: Thenail
I can cite multiple peer review papers, and the only response that I get is that everybody involve must be faking it. How do you fight that kind of intrenched attitude?
How do you convince somebody who thinks that you're being paid to post?
originally posted by: thebtheb
originally posted by: AaarghZombies
a reply to: Thenail
I can cite multiple peer review papers, and the only response that I get is that everybody involve must be faking it. How do you fight that kind of intrenched attitude?
How do you convince somebody who thinks that you're being paid to post?
The thing is: I can cite multiple peer reviewed papers too proving the other side of this, but no one will listen. The difference is that mine are from usually independent researchers, not researchers financially supported by pharma companies. I mean come on, there IS a difference there, and this is exactly why everyone says someone is being paid. Because the corruption is so incredibly rampant. I can't believe people cite Phizer studies to prove the vaccine is safe. That's hilarious.