It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: vonclod
originally posted by: yuppa
originally posted by: vonclod
originally posted by: yuppa
originally posted by: vonclod
a reply to: yuppa
No its called enforcing the law.
He was immediately fired though, his superiors disagree with you. It's not about optics, it's about what was a reasonable course of action, and what else could of been done. This cop was reckless.
I looked after a quadriplegic for about 5 years, so I'm quit familiar with people who have disabilities.
his superiors are afraid for their jobs is whats is wrong.
No, shooting a guy in a wheelchair in the back 8 times, pausing a second or 2 to drill one in the head, with a store employee somewhat in line of fire, is whats wrong. This f'ing coward had a whole lot of opportunity to do it different. Quit licking boots. In no sane world is this acceptable.
SMGDH
Not licking boots,just stating a fact the higher ups if they did not fire him would lose their jobs,so They are afraid for their jobs correct?
No, I doubt it, unless you are a super authoritarian, what this cop did was reckless, and beyond reasonable, beyond policy.
originally posted by: yuppa
originally posted by: vonclod
originally posted by: yuppa
originally posted by: vonclod
originally posted by: yuppa
originally posted by: vonclod
a reply to: yuppa
No its called enforcing the law.
He was immediately fired though, his superiors disagree with you. It's not about optics, it's about what was a reasonable course of action, and what else could of been done. This cop was reckless.
I looked after a quadriplegic for about 5 years, so I'm quit familiar with people who have disabilities.
his superiors are afraid for their jobs is whats is wrong.
No, shooting a guy in a wheelchair in the back 8 times, pausing a second or 2 to drill one in the head, with a store employee somewhat in line of fire, is whats wrong. This f'ing coward had a whole lot of opportunity to do it different. Quit licking boots. In no sane world is this acceptable.
SMGDH
Not licking boots,just stating a fact the higher ups if they did not fire him would lose their jobs,so They are afraid for their jobs correct?
No, I doubt it, unless you are a super authoritarian, what this cop did was reckless, and beyond reasonable, beyond policy.
still didnt answer my question.
originally posted by: JBurns
a reply to: didntasktobeborned
All cops are “regular guys”
Would you rather LEOs be elite Ivy League types? You really want someone than regular guys/gals enforcing the law? Really?
originally posted by: penroc3
a reply to: yuppa
just remember this was over a tool box.
he was going back into the store and had to use an electric wheel chair to do so, it isn't like he is a light risk
between the cop and the security guard(the one who shot) they could have put him on the ground.
or just tip him out by pulling over the chair or him out of it, Police in the UK disarm and arrest knife wielding abled body people all the time
the shot to the head at the end is murder.
if ANYONE of us here did that we would be looking at life or a death penalty
and the thing is the shooter was off duty so he is not covered by the blanket of the law that protects cops on duty, he was a civilian at the time and the outrage over this will land him in jail at the very least and executed at the extreme.
the fact he was fired almost instantly doesn't seem like it is going to turn out well for him]
he waited for the guy to hit the ground and then shot him in the head that is pre meditated murder.
maybe the first 7 shots weren't but the last two were. he had time to think what he was doing and he murdered that guy over a cheep tool box
i don't condone stealing but executing someone over a small item is sooooo far over the line
stole a toolbox
being caught shoplifting
refusing TO OBEY
the commands to stop
...
no apparent reason
originally posted by: Tempter
Unreal.
Thankfully, the Chief of Police already fired him and this piggy is going to pay.
originally posted by: JBurns
a reply to: bigfatfurrytexan
Someone in a wheelchair is more than capable of causing deadly harm.
How do they know he’s truly bound to the chair? Killers are known for ruses.
When he started reaching behind himself, he sealed the deal. He’s a threat to my partner and the public he’s going down and the courts can debate it later
Yes, plenty of limits. Just not this one! I don’t see someone in a wheelchair as more or less of a threat than anyone else. There may be logistical issues of getting to a specific victim, but who knows in the moment if he’s using the chair as a prop?
It’s the reaching and swinging a knife that gets me
9 times seems excessive. Granted. But it’s a testament to his training that he didn’t mag dump him. Around half the ammo in his mag, likely, was fired. It’s hard to regain composure in that moment
Sure you can go for a less lethal. But what happens when you’re wrong? What happens when he suddenly draws a handgun and starts killing innocent people? The problem is people not knowing how to act properly around other
I’m willing to give them the benefit of the doubt. This isn’t about an innocent man being gunned down