The Fight for Election Integrity Continues -- Audits, Criminal Investigations, Legislative Reform

I think I am going to do a little experiment.

If I don't vote in the 2022 election, I'll be put on the inactive voter list for the 2024 election.

If I don't vote in the 2024 election, I'll have a greater chance of having my vote stolen by being on the inactive list.

In my state, I'll be able to see if a vote was cast in my name after to election.

If my 2024 vote is stolen, I will take every legal action at my disposal.

I live in a conservative area and tend to vote conservative, so I doubt that my red votes will be missed.

Either things in this country are going to slow get better, or they will continue to get worse.
It's that simple and it's up to everyone who wants a better, brighter tomorrow to act.

I've got so many links to post, I hope I can get to them all. I'll start with the ones with federal/national events, as opposed to specific states, in no particular order.

NEW REPORT REVEALS MAJORITY OF AMERICANS ARE CONCERNED ABOUT ELECTION INTEGRITY, CHEATING

According to new data from Rasmussen Reports, 83 percent of likely voters today are concerned about election integrity ahead of the 2022 midterms, and 75 percent are concerned about election cheating.

Those are some mighty big numbers...

The study itself is behind a pay wall, but Rasmussen did confirm the numbers in their own tweet.
------------------

HUGE DEVELOPMENT: Supreme Court Finally Ready to Hear Argument that Only Legislatures Have Right to Update Election Law – Not Leftist Judges or Executive Branch

Within the above link, there are several links to other articles. This one case/ruling will affect all states, and federal efforts, to establish election rules and procedures outside the state legislatures' authority. Everything from dropboxes not authorized and legislated by the state legislature, to drawing Congressional districts, and Everything in between.
‐--‐-------------‐---

Biden Creating Permanent U.S. Postal Service Division to Deliver and Return Ballots in US Elections
The above reminds us that the post office has its own trust issues in election matters, such as the postal driver that reported transporting a truckload of ballots across state lines, or the postal worker who reported ballots received after election day being back-postmarked.
------------------

More Than 100 Trump-Affiliated Lawyers Targeted By Dark Money Group

A 65 Project will spend millions this year trying to expose and disbar more than 100 lawyers who worked on former President Donald Trump’s election lawsuits.

The group — which takes its name from the number of lawsuits filed that challenged the 2020 election results — is a dark money-fueled nonprofit tied to Democrat Party bigwigs. The 65 Project plans to file ethics complaints against 111 attorneys across 26 states while also airing ads against them in key battlegrounds such as Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin.

Just more of Biden's awesome possum Election Fraud Organization...

From Colorado, in chronological order ‐-

Breaking: Tina Peters Challenges Colorado’s Unbelievable GOP SoS Primary Election Results — Where No-Name Zuckerberg CTCL Candidate Came Out of Nowhere, Made Up 35% Vote Deficit, and Won Primary

(Lots of good back story info in above link that helps explain the following links)

CAUGHT: Machines Stole Another Race in Colorado – Flipped Vote Totals from GOP Grassroots Favorite Lynda Wilson After Election Called and Gave Them to RINO Lundeen — BRAZEN FRAUD!

BREAKING: Dominion Voting Machines FAIL Testing for Colorado Secretary of State Recount — Major Discrepancy Reported with Logic and Accuracy Testing

BREAKING: El Paso Colorado Team to File Lawsuit at 8AM [Saturday, July 30] in El Paso County, Colorado – Calling on Sheriff to Act – Detain Voting Machines for Forensic Audit

I got this in an email:

app.advocacytoaction.com...

As we reported on Saturday, pre-recount testing took place in counties around Colorado, and the test in El Paso County, CO yielded a ballot rejection rate of anywhere from 54-57%. The official narrative is that the high error rate means the machines are working, and the machine recount commenced in El Paso Sunday morning.

Got news for you. That means your election supervisors are broken, or at least incompetent, and at worse corrupted.

Four candidates have paid the money for a machine recount of the Colorado Primary Election, including Secretary of State candidate Tina Peters whose inclusion means the recount will take place in all 64 counties.

Thank God for honest and courageous Americans like Tina Peters. Bravo!

Speaking of Colorado, Mesa County Clerk Tina Peters has been persecuted for making an image of Dominion machines. The cornerstone of this case is that she allegedly allowed an unauthorized person to use someone else’s credentials to access the secure room.

Interestingly, in Maricopa County, Arizona, the same thing happened – except the individual with unauthorized access wasn’t preserving records (as in the case of Peters).

He was deleting them. Instead of handing them to auditors. Sounds like legitimate and legally sound behavior from an election official.

Reported by the Gateway Pundit, “On Saturday, it was revealed by Vanbibber that Maricopa County election Database Administrator Brian Ramirez was granted unauthorized entry to the server room on multiple occasions, and he deleted the files.”

Ramirez has an eight year tenure at the Maricopa elections office. Prior to deleting election records, he was a youth basketball coach according to his LinkedIn. His LinkedIn “Interests” include “Runbeck” and the “Federal Bureau of Investigation.”

Will the FBI take an interest in Ramirez as well now that it’s been revealed that he deleted election records in violation of the law? Don’t hold your breath.

If we were holding our breaths, we would have been dead a long time ago.

Peaceful, positive, change is what's needed, and it's up to us to act accordingly.

a reply to: IndieA

Interestingly, in Maricopa County, Arizona, the same thing happened – except the individual with unauthorized access wasn’t preserving records (as in the case of Peters).

He was deleting them. Instead of handing them to auditors. Sounds like legitimate and legally sound behavior from an election official.

I have this queued up for my AZ posting, but wanted to link it up with your post too:

BREAKING: Bombshell Presentation Reveals Identities Of Maricopa County Election Employees Who Deleted Files From Election Server BEFORE Maricopa County Audit

To refresh memories, during the (Federal) Congressional hearing held in DC, the Maricopa Supervisors first denied deleting these files; but when it was shown the election files were in fact deleted, the Supervisors claimed they were "archived" (a violation of the election laws as written). It was also revealed that ONLY these election records were "archived." Previous election records were not "archived."

a reply to: Boadicea

Vanbibber matched the server room entry logs to the video footage and found Brian Ramirez using others’ cards to access the room. Vanbibber: So basically, you have Brian entering the server room, and remember I told you he does not have badge access. We The People actually collected server room logs from Maricopa. So I went through all this video footage and matched it with the logs. What you see is Brian has Passarelli’s card in the server room, and he also has Charles Cooley’s badge as well. Logan: So, Brian is accessing the server room using the identities and cards of other people. Maricopa County policies also require two people in the server room whenever someone is using the keyboard video monitor, however, Brian was alone on multiple occasions.

Wow. This has been known for a while now, too.

originally posted by: IndieA


Wow. This has been known for a while now, too.

but as we know and have seen, the law only works when the offending person is Republican.

a reply to: IndieA

Wow. This has been known for a while now, too.

Yup. It sure has. And no one saw fit to inform the public. Not just the identity of the one doing the deleting, but also the ID badges used to do so. We still don't know if these badges were stolen or shared willingly.

Doesn't inspire much confidence, eh? Exactly the opposite.

And the primary is tomorrow...

From Wisconsin:

WHAT FRAUD? Racine, Wisconsin Rolls Out Its Mobile Home Voting Station on Wheels – Paid for Exclusively with Zuckerbucks (VIDEO)

The city of Racine started using the new “mobile voting precinct” in June 2021.

It’s the first of its kind in Wisconsin.

City volunteers and staff work in the buses. But no GOP observers.

ETA: It doesn't say there were any Dem observers either... perhaps no observers at all?

First of its kind in Wisconsin | Racine now has its mobile election vehicle, thanks to CTCL grant.

The vehicle could be used as an early voting location or voter registration booth in different predetermined locationns throughout the year.

I meant to add these to the Wisconsin post above but hit "reply" too soon. Doh!

HUGE: Wisconsin Investigator Discovers Ease of Harvesting Election Ballots Online – It’s Nothing Short of Shocking — A CHEATER’S DREAM!

The state of Wisconsin allows anyone with a smartphone or computer is able to order an absentee ballot online in someone’s else’s name.

They can have that absentee ballot sent to an address other than the registered voter.

All you need is the date of birth!

UPDATE: Racine County Sheriff Calls on Attorney General to Suspend Election Ballot Harvesting Option on Wisconsin’s Official Election Website

The Racine County Sheriff’s Office was contacted about this serious vulnerability to fraudulent voting in the state.

The Sheriff’s Office contacted the Wisconsin Attorney General’s Office and the Wisconsin Elections Commission.

Sheriff Christopher Schmaling is calling for three things:

• The immediate suspension of the function within My Vote Wisconsin where a person can request another’s absentee ballot and have it mailed to a different address, with or without showing any proper photo identification.
  
• The Sheriff’s Office is calling for the immediate suspension of the function allowing for the declaration of being indefinitely confined, which allows for ballots to be sent to different addresses for “All future elections”.
  
• The Sheriff’s Office is requesting a full, state-wide, investigation into this voter integrity issue by the Attorney General’s Office and the Wisconsin Election Commission to ensure the voting process is secure and that appropriate safeguards are in place.

The Sheriff’s statement can be read here.

Thinking about Maricopa county, and man, I bet those splunk logs would have told a hell of a story.

Remember how closely they were protected? We were told that the data was co-mingled with law enforcement data. How strange. It took court cases, then an agreeded upon "special master" to do the special splunk log audit that took forever to even happen. Three auditors were used. All three of their resumes are attached to the audit report. The most qualified was actually swapped in at the last minute, and had an extensive cyber warfare and computer systems background including "red 'vs' blue team" experience that I spoke about earlier in this thread. He was also still employed with the federal government as an Army reservist, I assume would have to have high level clearances, and would also be loyal to his boss the federal government, first and foremost. The other two auditors were left in the dark, I believe, but could have been paid off, or perhaps just convinced that this was a matter of "national security".

I can sum up the report that was produced with, "Everything is as it should be, nothing to see here." "Oh yeah, and the election sever was definitely not connected to the internet. Don't ask for proof though, you'll just have to believe me."

Jovan said that the law enforcement co-mingling was with the DHS.

It could have easily been an excuse as well, but in Florida, I found out that my new Sheriff department's center has nothing to do with our county's election network, but the DHS and CISA do "partner" with the county's election office that does run their networks.

Hypothetically, if the elections are hacked, or even somewhat controlled from the top down, a lot of vote stealing could be taking place electronically, as many suspect, and evidence has shown. If we can't look at the logs, or are told they don't exist, how would we ever know?

And what about all the honest election workers who could theoretically have their hard work changed behind their backs, and their honesty questioned?

I'm guessing that no future audit will be able to look at any election splunk logs, so long as the truth is being suspressed.

a reply to: Boadicea

That will help explain Liz Chenney's upcoming re-election.

That, and I heard that she was asking Dems to register as Republicans in order to be able to vote for her. What a POS.

Arizona AG releases letter regarding Cyber Ninjas claim and other reported claims of dead voters after investigation complete. It was not noted if the dead voter had mailed in the ballot and died before election day. There is no charge at this time.

Arizona Attorney General Mark Brnovich said Monday his investigators found just one dead voter after thoroughly reviewing findings

“Our agents investigated all individuals that Cyber Ninjas reported as dead, and many were very surprised to learn that they were allegedly deceased,” Brnovich wrote in a letter to state Senate President Karen Fann,

Yahoo News

a reply to: frogs453

282 alleged ballots? Really? I remember that number being in the thousands, and I'm sure I can prove it, but I estimate that it would take me a while to track down the info with all the information suppression going on. I can't just do a simple search, I would have to go through the reports. I have better things to do like eat dinner.

Why am I not surprised that official number of dead voters was found to be only 1? It's like I even knew that was going to be the number. 2 would have been my second guess, not because I don't believe dead people voted, but because I believe that Brnovich is lying to us. Again, probably because of "national security" and because of how important voter confidence is. Voter confidence is clearly more important than actual election integrity in the eyes of the federal government.

Page 70 from the preliminary kinematic artifact detection report that was initially withheld from the public and sparked the AG's criminal investigation.



Also reported is that 3,616 registered after their death date.

What did the AG do? Find 281 living people with matching names and dates of birth, then ignore their addresses and the other 5,000+ dead voters.

Let me know when the AG figures out who's fault it is for election workers not having ballot paper on election day for almost 400,000 voters, and had to source their own which turned out to be thin, and who made the policy that Sharpies be used, because that looks a lot like a human engineered election hack.

a reply to: Boadicea

www.thegatewaypundit.com... ecutive-branch/

Is indeed HUGE, because liberals HATE THIS case. I listen to and read liberal outlets 7 days a week, to know when Republicans are on track, and which Republicans are traitors to the party.

a reply to: IndieA

AG Mark Brnovich of Arizona should cancel his campaign for (Senator? Governor?). He's going to be hauled before Congress in 2023 to tell what he knows about Arizona election cheating, and why he took part in covering it up, or participating in it.

originally posted by: Boadicea
a reply to: IndieA

Interestingly, in Maricopa County, Arizona, the same thing happened – except the individual with unauthorized access wasn’t preserving records (as in the case of Peters).

He was deleting them. Instead of handing them to auditors. Sounds like legitimate and legally sound behavior from an election official.

I have this queued up for my AZ posting, but wanted to link it up with your post too:

BREAKING: Bombshell Presentation Reveals Identities Of Maricopa County Election Employees Who Deleted Files From Election Server BEFORE Maricopa County Audit

To refresh memories, during the (Federal) Congressional hearing held in DC, the Maricopa Supervisors first denied deleting these files; but when it was shown the election files were in fact deleted, the Supervisors claimed they were "archived" (a violation of the election laws as written). It was also revealed that ONLY these election records were "archived." Previous election records were not "archived."

Does anyone remember WHAT FILES were deleted? Depending on how incriminating they are, this could be worthy of a stand-alone thread.

a reply to: Boadicea

State law enforcement officials need to STOP sharing their election-related concerns and grievances with Democrat Attorney Generals and the Corrupt Dem/Repub controlled state "election commission" in Wisconsin.

In Wisconsin (and several other states), the State Legislature, or state Supreme Court, should receive the concerns and grievances from state law enforcement agencies.

a reply to: carewemust

There were election files that had been deleted from the election server hard drive, but they were removed by the auditors and documented in their report. These deleted records were where most of the discrepancies were found, if my memory serves me correctly.