It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Vaccine passport illegal in Ontario

page: 2
24
<< 1   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 26 2021 @ 04:15 AM
link   
"DEATH TO ALL: Vaccine industry now tweaking spike proteins to target minks, cats, dogs, and other pets".

This


vaccine industry and its gain-of-function, virus engineering infrastructure is not content with forcing spike protein experiments on every man, woman and child. The vaccine industry and its vast network of propagandists are now targeting animals – minks, cats, dogs and other pets.

In fact, Great Britain’s Labour Party is already urging health ministers to approve coronavirus vaccines for pets. Sir Mark Hendrick said, “The priority is to vaccinate humans, but a year or so down the line we have to look at animal vaccines.”
He also said the virus possibly originated in bats and believes this justifies inoculating pets (even though WHO and China have failed to identify an animal reservoir for the SARS-CoV-2 virus).

Spike protein to be “tweaked” to create new vaccines for pets


Covid vaccines for animals will do nothing more than harm the innate immune system of the animals and cause inflammation in their cardiovascular system, leading to more vet visits, hospitalizations and deaths – an atrocity already being witnessed in vaccinated human populations.



edit on 26-9-2021 by PillarOfFire because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 26 2021 @ 04:58 AM
link   
a reply to: PillarOfFire

Do you have a source other than natural news for this?

The source that you've posted discredits itself with the very first sentence that you've posted as no Gain of function research is or has been commissioned in relation to this. That was debunked in congress a long time back, people who didn't understand what gain of function was took the phrase and ran with it, but it's not supported by any documentary evidence.



posted on Sep, 26 2021 @ 04:01 PM
link   

originally posted by: AaarghZombies

originally posted by: pteridine
a reply to: AaarghZombies
The vax only reduces symptoms for the vaxee, it does not prevent transmission at all. The entire premise of "herd immunity" from the vax is false and Fauci is ignoring that fact. Masks are a feel good w/resp to a virus, especially the Chinese paper dust masks or cloth masks. The virus will mutate into a less virulent more contagious strain -- according to some it will be a cold by spring.

People are balancing the possible side effects of the vax, which are not insignificant, with the chances of being sicker from the WuFlu. It is an individual decision and does not affect anyone else.



Nope, by reducing the prevalence of the virus in the body the vaccine significantly reduces transmission.

On average an unvaxxed person will infect 3 other people. Whereas there will, on average, only be one new infection for every 4 vaxxed people.

You're chanced of having serious side effect form the vaccine are 0.0067%. Which is literally is the definition of insignificant.
This is just pure unproven bull#. No offense, but you can repeat these numbers until you are blue in the face and it will never make them true.

Show your work please, so I can dissect it line by line. Thank you.
edit on 26-9-2021 by macaronicaesar because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 26 2021 @ 06:29 PM
link   

originally posted by: macaronicaesar

originally posted by: AaarghZombies

originally posted by: pteridine
a reply to: AaarghZombies
The vax only reduces symptoms for the vaxee, it does not prevent transmission at all. The entire premise of "herd immunity" from the vax is false and Fauci is ignoring that fact. Masks are a feel good w/resp to a virus, especially the Chinese paper dust masks or cloth masks. The virus will mutate into a less virulent more contagious strain -- according to some it will be a cold by spring.

People are balancing the possible side effects of the vax, which are not insignificant, with the chances of being sicker from the WuFlu. It is an individual decision and does not affect anyone else.



Nope, by reducing the prevalence of the virus in the body the vaccine significantly reduces transmission.

On average an unvaxxed person will infect 3 other people. Whereas there will, on average, only be one new infection for every 4 vaxxed people.

You're chanced of having serious side effect form the vaccine are 0.0067%. Which is literally is the definition of insignificant.
This is just pure unproven bull#. No offense, but you can repeat these numbers until you are blue in the face and it will never make them true.

Show your work please, so I can dissect it line by line. Thank you.


It is all about the framing. The statement makes it sound like all unvaccinated people are going to automatically infect any 3 people that are unvaccinated, with the possibility of even infecting the vaccinated. Because, according to the science, the vaccine does not prevent illness, it just lessens the severity of the infection, and reduces the risk of hospitalization.

Of course, they want to make everyone believe the unvaccinated will get sicker than the vaccinated, and will take up all the hospital beds, but that is not always the case. Using their own numbers, if you have 75% more vaccinated people than unvaccinated, then there will be more infected vaccinated people, and more of them in hospital. Add to it the issue that you cannot be sure of how or where a person became infected, to blame it on the unnamed unvaccinated person is deceitful.

They can claim all they want, that by having the vaccine, your symptoms will be milder, but there is no way to prove that. They are just rolling the dice and making the results fit the narrative they are pushing.

The truth is, that an uninfected unvaccinated, or vaccinated person, cannot infect anyone, if they are not infected. As for asymptomatic transmission, if a person has no symptoms, there is no way of knowing who they infected or even how they transmitted the infection.

If a person is unvaccinated, infected, and asymptomatic, since they carry around the same viral load as an infected asymptomatic vaccinated person, they both have equal possibilities of infecting others.

Any infected person, whether they are vaccinated or not, carries the same risk possibility of infecting anyone else, vaccinated or not.

The reason for the constant re-framing of the narrative about the unvaccinated being a potentially deadly threat to the planet, has it roots in greed, power, control, and division.

We are way smarter than this. It doesn't take a lot of thought to see through the manipulation and the ruse.

Of course it doesn't matter who, how, when, where, or why, if you are the one infected, lying in a hospital bed, afraid of dying. And they have no problem giving people someone to blame, whether it makes sense, or if it is true or not.

They are already talking about the need of another booster shot, a fourth dose. There is no end to this. Of course the blame for each new demand for another dose, will be laid at the feet of the unvaccinated. I wonder who or what, they will blame after all the unvaccinated have died, or have natural immunity. It won't really matter, they will always find a way to make the majority comply. It is what they do, and they do it very, very well.




edit on 26-9-2021 by NightSkyeB4Dawn because: Clean up. Sorry, accidentally posted when trying to review.




top topics
 
24
<< 1   >>

log in

join