It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
DRASTIC was recently made aware of documents provided by a whistleblower, which show that EcoHealth Alliance (EHA) in concert wIth the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) attempted to carry out advanced and dangerous human pathogenicity Bat Coronavirus research that would clearly qualify as Gain of Function (GoF), in a grant proposal submitted to the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) in 2018.
originally posted by: strongfp
a reply to: FamCore
I don't think these people realize the rest of 'us' have the internet at our disposal and can start connecting the dots much faster than the previous truth diggers could who took months or years to uncover shady stuff and then present it to some off beaten path lecture hall.
Conveniently, in 2018 NIH was funding the type of research that could have led to the accidental (or deliberate, for that matter) release of SARS-COV2 virus and ensuing pandemic, AND NIH was working with Moderna on mRNA vaccine research for these very types of coronaviruses that they were researching... interesting.
originally posted by: FamCore
a reply to: strongfp
thanks for including this - Fauci has blatantly lied to congress multiple times now. It seems nothing is going to be done because he is in "the club" though...
originally posted by: chr0naut
a reply to: FamCore
This isn't new.
It's the same old speculation, and this same guy has been saying the same thing, for ages.
For the odds to increase that the virus was man made, there would have to be some new credible evidence presented.
And really, do you think a shares trading huckster would be in the position to have access to that sort of information, most of which is probably located in a laboratory he doesn't, nor wouldn't, have access to, in China?
For the odds to increase that the virus was man made, there would have to be some new credible evidence presented.
originally posted by: Nunyabizisit
originally posted by: chr0naut
a reply to: FamCore
This isn't new.
It's the same old speculation, and this same guy has been saying the same thing, for ages.
For the odds to increase that the virus was man made, there would have to be some new credible evidence presented.
And really, do you think a shares trading huckster would be in the position to have access to that sort of information, most of which is probably located in a laboratory he doesn't, nor wouldn't, have access to, in China?
Shillin for CCP again?
What happens if you stop?
originally posted by: ManBehindTheMask
a reply to: chr0naut
For the odds to increase that the virus was man made, there would have to be some new credible evidence presented.
You mean like the actual paperwork that rand paul presented to Fauci on live television that proves they were funding and carrying out gain of function?
That was MONTHS ago on LIVE TV
Theres TONS of evidence that has been posted, some people just dont like the truth when they see it , no matter how in their face it is