The FDA knew the problems with the Vax but will still mandate it

It is tedious looking for relevant news in the places , that at the moment are missing worldwide censorship. But there is still some checkable information slipping through. Like how Fauci mandated a drug that killed fifty percent of the people they tried t on and used it on elderly Covid victims during the first wave. They actually bought up the worldwide supply and told doctors to use it to treat the elderly, this made the Covid deaths look bad when it was Remdesivir doing the offing. Strange how they would use an Ebola drug perhaps they thought the bit of Ebola stitched into the Covid virus might collapse it, Anyway this gets worse www.bitchute.com...

a reply to: anonentity

People need to do more than just wake up!
And if you want to remain asleep, then you'd better get out of the way.

What do we need, hundreds of thousands of signatures on a letter to our governors to demand states rights supersede this murderous, fascist BS?!!

a reply to: anonentity

It should work against all RNA viruses. They have a conserved active site in their RdRp, RNA polymerase, that generates RNA from an RNA template. This is something our cells cannot do and have no need to perform so RNA viruses either generate it upon entry or being the physical protein with them to copy their genes and generate mRNA for host cell ribosomes.

All RNA viruses have this stitched into them because it’s how they add nucleotides to an elongating strand of new RNA. Remdesivir binds to that site, preventing formation of a transcript or acting as a mutagen source so the virus can’t reproduce its genes.

Everyone says the kinetics and toxicity are favorable, we’ve heard that before so I would be interested if it can act elsewhere. Sometimes nucleoside analogs and drugs like them don’t work for long either or can’t bind enough RdRp to make a difference in severe infections, plus I’m sure mutations eventually that can escape it.

Can only imagine how idiotic those who only follow the MSM, are going to feel in the near future.

a reply to: anonentity


Mandate - A command or precept proceeding from a court or judicial officer, directing the proper officer to enforce a judgment, sentence, or decree . In other Words , NOT Impowered by Legislative LAW .



I am Getting Tired of Hearing that Word used in the Media to IMPLY a Lawful Act ............

a reply to: anonentity

Yeah, well even when the sh!tty corrupt WHO dogs do not recommend it, I'm not clear on what else needs be said.

Linkificationalisationific ation

originally posted by: shasta9600
Can only imagine how idiotic those who only follow the MSM, are going to feel in the near future.

They'll never learn, though.

Obama weaponized the media, now the masses listen to the propaganda.
when the narrative changes, the propaganda will direct the thought of the masses to follow.

originally posted by: anonentity
It is tedious looking for relevant news in the places , that at the moment are missing worldwide censorship. But there is still some checkable information slipping through. Like how Fauci mandated a drug that killed fifty percent of the people they tried t on and used it on elderly Covid victims during the first wave. They actually bought up the worldwide supply and told doctors to use it to treat the elderly, this made the Covid deaths look bad when it was Remdesivir doing the offing. Strange how they would use an Ebola drug perhaps they thought the bit of Ebola stitched into the Covid virus might collapse it, Anyway this gets worse www.bitchute.com...

A couple of mistakes here.

1. Dr. Fauci has no authority to mandate anything. He is a research scientist. He advises presidents and others.

2. He was aware of Remdesivir as an antiviral because it had been tried in an effort to fight Ebola in 2019. Remdesivir was first tried as a treatment for Hepatitis C in 2009, with no particular deadly effects, but not really effective against Hep C, either. Ebola, on the other hand has an untreated case mortality rate of about 67%. In the Ebola trials of 2019, Remdesivir reduced the mortality rate to “only” 53%. Two other therapeutics in that same trial were more efficacious so Remdesivir and ZMapp were dropped as candidates.

www.statnews.com...

I assume that study is where Dr. Bryan Ardis and you got the bullpuckey statement that Remdesivir killed half the patients it was tried on. It didn’t; it saved 14%. The 47% who died were killed by Ebola.

It doesn’t have much effect on COVID19, either. About like Hydroxychloroquine.

a reply to: anonentity



They are still using Remdesivir and they are still killing patients with it.

a reply to: MotherMayEye

seen that name around here a lot never looked it up, remdesivir... what does that even mean? link it.. I don't know know gaurdians of the galaxy format.

a reply to: 1947boomer

Lawyer talk. We will hear a lot of this in the coming years. Like... " We did not want to put the Jews in Camps but it was for their own safety"