What is going on with these Vaccines

a reply to: JAGStorm

I think "they" want to kill off all of us older people.

originally posted by: JAGStorm
Does this make any sense? WHY would it be ok for Over 65 to take it but not under????
Is this a fertility thing? Blood clot? Now they are suggesting mixing two different vaccines!
This is getting crazy.

because the blood clotting issues that were popping up occasionally with the AZ vaccine affected younger people.

a reply to: JAGStorm


twitter.com...

So if I take the vax, who’s responsible again if something happens? Nobody is? Hmmm....


a reply to: JAGStorm

originally posted by: fiverx313

originally posted by: JAGStorm
Does this make any sense? WHY would it be ok for Over 65 to take it but not under????
Is this a fertility thing? Blood clot? Now they are suggesting mixing two different vaccines!
This is getting crazy.

because the blood clotting issues that were popping up occasionally with the AZ vaccine affected younger people.

those poor younger people! It’s a shame there’s no recourse for them but to move on from those blood clots

originally posted by: Rob808
So if I take the vax, who’s responsible again if something happens?

a reply to: JAGStorm

That would be YOU.

originally posted by: Rob808
So if I take the vax, who’s responsible again if something happens? Nobody is? Hmmm....


a reply to: JAGStorm

You are responsible. It's voluntary. You get a letter "offering" you the potion.

originally posted by: JAGStorm
www.yahoo.com...

Swedish health agency: Those under 65 should receive different vaccine than AstraZeneca's for second dose

"People under the age of 65 who have already received a dose of Vaxzevria should instead be offered a second dose of so-called mRNA vaccine, such as Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna."

The agency is recommending that those who received their first AstraZeneca dose should receive a second dose of an mRNA vaccine approximately 12–15 weeks after, and no additional booster mRNA dose is required.

For people over 65, the benefits of the AstraZeneca vaccine outweigh the risks.

This is getting crazy.

it seems the USA news is implying the Swedish COVID Vaxx authorities is only the first to announce what is coming to the USA,
the USA mega Pharma Industry wants it known that ALL versions of the COVID Vaxxx are 'safe' and inter-changeable...
(no pharma left behind)

originally posted by: TheLieWeLive

If I told you I was going to give you something and no matter what happens I cannot be held responsible...and you still take it, well you might be an idiot.

Whatever happened to informed consent and personal responsibility? It used to be a conservative virtue until very recently.

originally posted by: IAMTAT

originally posted by: Rob808
So if I take the vax, who’s responsible again if something happens?

a reply to: JAGStorm

That would be YOU.

That doesn’t make me feel very protected from any potential wrongdoings by the drug manufacture etc. is it common to have the manufacture immune from any liabilities in other vaccines ?

originally posted by: Soloprotocol

originally posted by: Rob808
So if I take the vax, who’s responsible again if something happens? Nobody is? Hmmm....


a reply to: JAGStorm

You are responsible. It's voluntary. You get a letter "offering" you the potion.

So I don’t lose anything by not getting it? Like no employment opportunities or say, the right to assemble like at a bar or restaurant.. maybe go to a museum or a concert... go to a voting booth... travel across state lines or board a plane...?

originally posted by: Whodathunkdatcheese

originally posted by: TheLieWeLive

If I told you I was going to give you something and no matter what happens I cannot be held responsible...and you still take it, well you might be an idiot.

Whatever happened to informed consent and personal responsibility? It used to be a conservative virtue until very recently.

How informed can one be on experiment vaccines for a novel virus that have only been publicly available for a very short time?

originally posted by: Rob808
So if I take the vax, who’s responsible again if something happens? Nobody is? Hmmm....


a reply to: JAGStorm

If you take the shot, you alone are responsible. If you rushed in and volunteered to be injected with an experimental and dangerous drug to protect against a virus with a 99% survival rate, you've been duped, you are the medical equivalent of a crash test dummy.

The mitigating circumstance is that you've been terrorized for more than a year now by the medical industrial complex.

originally posted by: Rob808

originally posted by: Soloprotocol

originally posted by: Rob808
So if I take the vax, who’s responsible again if something happens? Nobody is? Hmmm....


a reply to: JAGStorm

You are responsible. It's voluntary. You get a letter "offering" you the potion.

So I don’t lose anything by not getting it? Like no employment opportunities or say, the right to assemble like at a bar or restaurant.. maybe go to a museum or a concert... go to a voting booth... travel across state lines or board a plane...?

Why would you lose those rights?. Everyone else has been vaccinated so you are no danger to them.

In fact, the ones who are vaccinated are probably more of a danger to you because they could be carrying the virus and simply not know.

that's how it works, right?

Anyway. You have a tiny percentage more, like a minuscule % more of dying from Covid than you have the flu.

I mean, You don't #e the bed and demanded to be vaccinated, wear a mask or stand 6 feet from someone, cancel all family gatherings, miss out on hugs and kisses from grandchildren, etc when flu season comes around, do you?.

originally posted by: IAMTAT
a reply to: JAGStorm

twitter.com...

Perfect! The Georgia guidstones are the first thing i thought of when i heard about these vaccines, depopulation has been a goal of "theirs" for quite some time now.