Democrats Caught Pushing Fake Evidence as Impeachment Case Implodes!!!

originally posted by: Wide-Eyes

originally posted by: spacedoubt

originally posted by: HalWesten

originally posted by: spacedoubt

originally posted by: Doctor Smith
a reply to: spacedoubt

Maybe you should have listened and watched the video. Instead of boting 2 minutes after my post.

Synopsis then.
It’s typically a requirement on ats.

Have at it doc

Right. I've asked for it many times and have been ignored almost every time. When are the "requirements" going to be enforced?

Twitterbook syndrome, I suppose.
If you see them and complain, we’ll debate as mods and try to do better.

I might not agree with you on this thread topic but you've never given me any bother as a moderator.

I appreciate that. I get fired up too.
My opinion can get a bit lonely sometimes.
I even allow myself to get trolled sometimes too.
Hard enough talking politics with family, with strangers it can be rough.

Well

When you build a ‘case’ on a false premise. It’s doomed to implode before it even begins

Kind of like the the last sham impeachment, a failure.

NVM.

Post removed as courtesy to member SKEPTIK

This is NOT the Mud Pit!!!

All rules for POLITE On Topic, political debate will be enforced.

Trolling, And What To Do About It


Terms And Conditions Of Use


You are responsible for your own posts.....those who ignore that responsibility will face mod actions.


and, as always:

Do NOT reply to this post!!

They are claiming to find an imperfect speck in a mountain of evidence. Fine take it, doesn't change the guiltiness

A whole election was stolen, getting trump impeached, that’s nothing to these people
Have you not seen their power

originally posted by: ras321
They are claiming to find an imperfect speck in a mountain of evidence. Fine take it, doesn't change the guiltiness

So an imperfect speck in a completely sham farce trial that craps all over the American Constitution changes the whole outlook on a false narrative?

Ooooookaaay....

What do we know about the history of Impeachment Manager TED LIEU?

He seems at ease with violating rules: twitter.com...

Could he be an advance infiltrator from the CCP...planted in our system many years ago?

a reply to: underwerks

What do comments from around the globe have to do with the message ?

so can somebody tell me in plain English
what 'false evidence' the dems are/were pushing?

not that I doubt it but I'd like to know specifics.

originally posted by: ElGoobero
so can somebody tell me in plain English
what 'false evidence' the dems are/were pushing?

not that I doubt it but I'd like to know specifics.

“Pick a card, any card”

originally posted by: ElGoobero
so can somebody tell me in plain English
what 'false evidence' the dems are/were pushing?

not that I doubt it but I'd like to know specifics.

Oh that's interesting. I think it would be better if you show us any evidence of Trump inciting a riot at the capitol. You know. A video like this..........I can't seem to find any with Trump doing anything. Can you give us an example? Why aren't the instigators in the video below impeached instead of Trump?????????????????

Politicians inciting riots

Lindsey Graham says Democrats went overboard and shot themselves in the foot during the impeachment trial.

As a result, the votes to "NOT Convict" former President Trump are steadily growing.

Source: gazette.com... d1e-9ff3-2804fac3f3ac.html

Impeachment Trial #1 was filled with the same Democrat hysteria, hyperbole, and exaggerations. As a result, President Trump was acquitted. We're looking at Trump acquittal 2.0 next week.

Nothing sham about the trial. Does it hurt that Hillary was so right? a reply to: slatesteam