It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
A member of the Oklahoma House of Representatives has filed a bill that calls for the establishment of a Bigfoot hunting season in the state. The audacious idea is reportedly the brainchild of Rep. Justin Humphrey, who reportedly put forward the proposal on Wednesday. The fairly succinct resolution, states that "The Oklahoma Wildlife Conservation Commission shall promulgate rules establishing a big foot [sic] hunting season. The Commission shall set annual season dates and create any necessary specific hunting licenses and fees."
The Oklahoma bill is a decidedly different type of Sasquatch-related legislation compared to resolutions passed in other states and local communities. In some instances, Bigfoot has been 'honored' by way of some kind of formal recognition naming it the official cryptid of a particular locality. And, in one county in Oregon, purposely killing a Sasquatch is actually illegal and punishable by up to one year in prison. As of yet, of course, no one has been busted breaking the Bigfoot law, although encouraging people to go out and try to hunt a Sasquatch, as is proposed in Oklahoma, may not be the best idea considering the creatures bipedal nature might lead to a tragic case of misidentification.
** article source from C2C **
But before you don your tinfoil hats, load up the car with your binoculars, cameras and winter-weather gear and head up to Mt. Baker Ski Area to see if maybe Sasquatch has made his or her way up to the North Cascades, there’s something you should be aware of — Whatcom County has been proclaimed a Sasquatch Protection and Refuge Area.
Has been for nearly three decades now.
originally posted by: LABTECH767
a reply to: JohnnyAnonymous
First off is there any evidence it is dangerous to people (lots of your citizens go missing every year in the US so maybe there is?), is it edible (reports are that it stink's really bad), is it intelligent as in sentient? (there are human beings alive to this day that avoid contact with other peoples living stone age existence on all continents (maybe? not Europe) and some islands of the world, is it HUMAN? or close to human enough to be regarded as PEOPLE? (Now if it is then hunting it would be murders plain and simple and if it is not then hunting it would still be unethical since it is obviously very rare and therefore endangered).
To pass a bill to allow the hunting of ANY species which we do not have he measure of is opening a back door for human hunting weirdo's to exploit as well as generally a dangerous idea.
However if it can be proven that bigfoot is dangerous to man then fair enough.
The beings in this story seem to be human or at least a cousin of humanity and therefore PEOPLE and should receive the same protections as any human being if the story is true.
exemplore.com...
Also if TRUE then the man who ate part of a bigfoot (if it really was) is a cannibal plain and simple.
But they can also be a lot more dangerous and so too can we, I mean we are not always kind or civilized now are we.
www.liveabout.com...
Now bare in mind if these are the same race or offshoots of the same race all around the world then they must have had a more advanced ancestry at some point in there own past and once been a migrating race of people to have reached these places and given these populations if these attacks are real are so widely spread even in places were only boats could have taken them?
mysteriousuniverse.org...
mysteriousuniverse.org...
mysteriousuniverse.org...
anomalien.com...
You can not pass a law to protect it if you don't know if it exists and you should not be allowed to pass a law to harm if unless you can prove it is a danger and does exist, otherwise let's all shoot the wardrobe and pop a few rounds under the bed just to make sure the closet monster is not hiding there.
Still if they are real then there are several possible origin's, remnants of dead hominid lines that are not quite extinct, inbred mutated human's that have become a different group - some of them have shown interest in human females so? or just big animals?.
Either way is hunting and murdering possible PEOPLE just because they are hairy and live in a stone age lifestyle while avoiding our race of man really justifiable or is it just a sick twisted tourist idea from a guy that thinks they are a fairy tale.
Sorry for the late edit, just had a quick bath before bed but this is worth taking into account, serial killer?, Human eating animal?, weirdo with a fetish for shoes down inside an abandoned mine?.
I mean why would someone take shoes down a mine?.
originally posted by: Caver78
Read the bill and can't decide if I'm more pissed he's backtracking from a "kill stance" or more pissed he's going to get innocent people injured in the woods.
No State has issued a kill season on Sasquatch yet, but should one, what would happen? This would most likely force the Fed's hand in both trying to stop it while trying not to say what they already know. The court battles would be educational.
“If the Commission does not specifically list an indigenous, nongame species, then the species is considered nonprotected nongame wildlife. A nonprotected nongame animal may be hunted on private property with landowner consent by any means, at any time and there is no bag limit or possession limit.” David Sinclair, direction of the law enforcement division at Texas Parks and Wildlife, confirmed in 2012 that Bigfoot is always in season in Texas and there’s no limit to how many one can shoot.
originally posted by: LABTECH767
a reply to: JohnnyAnonymous
However if it can be proven that bigfoot is dangerous to man then fair enough.