It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
State and Federal Data on COVID-19 Testing Don’t Match Up
Curiously enough, the CDC’s state and national totals for cases and deaths match up well with what we’ve gathered from states at the COVID Tracking Project. So do its national testing totals. Only when you dig into the state-level testing data—where discrepancies skew in both directions—do things begin to go awry.
The data sets have one known major difference: Some states report the total number of people tested, while the CDC reports every test, even if a single person is tested more than once.
“DeSantis touted the number of people tested for coronavirus in Florida, but as News 6 reported last week, when you look at our population of roughly 22 million people, the number the governor gave would be over 1% of the population tested.
It isn't true.
We asked the governor if re-tests are included in that number.
“Yeah so they are, it’s a good, good question,” DeSantis said. “So yes it does include that, because what happens is, you’ll have health care workers, some of them don’t ever test positive, but some have been tested multiple times, because they may have had an exposure, so its not unique individuals, it’s total tests,” the governor said.”
(AND)
“The number of re-tests is not included on the state’s dashboard. We asked the governor if it was misleading not to point out the number of re-tests.
“It’s not misleading, because the labs report, they dump the numbers to the department of health. So what the department of health does, is they put it on the dashboard immediately so that people have the information,” DeSantis said. “On the second page, if you look it says, it explains how some people are re-testing.”
The governor showed how in the fine print of the state’s 537-page daily report it reads, “people tested on multiple days will be included for each day a new result was received."
But an explanation about re-tests is not on the state’s very colorful dashboard that provides testing numbers at a glance.
“Are retests included in that number?" we asked.
“Yeah so they are, it’s a good question,” Gov. DeSantis said.
Here's what a retest is.
If you have a test for COVID-19 and it’s positive, the Florida Department of Health recommends 14 days of isolation, after that, you should have another test.
Twenty-four hours later you should have another test to make sure you’re negative.
All of those test results go into the number on the state’s dashboard, even though it’s one person.
(AND)
We asked the governor the same day if the state would update the dashboard to show the number of people tested minus re-tests.
“And actually you know what we can do, I’m going to see if they can parse it a little bit more,” the Governor said. “So I want just the fresh tests, I think that’s better.”
There was a change.
The state changed the title on the dashboard from "total tests" to "total people tested.”
Unfortunately, that could be even more confusing, because the number still includes retests.
(AND)
After more than a week of multiple phone calls and emails, we asked the Florida Department of Health if they could give us the number of unique people who have been tested.
We are still waiting.
Either they don't know the number or they aren't releasing it.
We have been asking the governor and the Florida Department of Health the question for weeks, but despite repeated emails and phone calls we still do not have a clear answer.
originally posted by: hombero
"How many reported daily ‘new cases’ are actually ‘old cases’?"
How is a reinfection not a new case? Do you really think it makes sense to treat it as not a new infection, when the person got over the previous infection just to get it again? What would we alternatively refer to this as?
a reply to: MotherMayEye
originally posted by: BrianFlanders
You know. I wondered all along what was sospeciousspecial about this "6 feet" rule. I mean, it logically makes sense to distance yourself from potentially sick people, right? Of course it does! But why 6 feet? Why so specifically 6 feet? Why doesn't it change with new information?
Makes me kinda wonder if they needed 6 feet of space between people (for whatever reason) from the get go and now have never changed it because they can't.
Incidentally, I noticed my wireless keyboard gets a little flaky depending on where it is.
originally posted by: hombero
"How many reported daily ‘new cases’ are actually ‘old cases’?"
How is a reinfection not a new case? Do you really think it makes sense to treat it as not a new infection, when the person got over the previous infection just to get it again? What would we alternatively refer to this as?
a reply to: MotherMayEye
originally posted by: ketsuko
So this whole thing has royally exposed the Centers for Disease Control hasn't it?
They basically have one function, and they can't handle it. So what good are they? I am pretty sure the postmortem of this will see them crying in congress making claims that they'd have done better if only they had more money, but I'm also pretty sure that time and again their rules and regs and red tape just plain got in the way of timely response.
They also seem to have inadequate means of record keeping too and lack of some kind of infrastructure and system for reliably keeping and organizing that data.
Where have they been spending all the money they've been getting from us thus far? Perhaps an audit is in order.
originally posted by: BrianFlanders
You know. I wondered all along what was sospeciousspecial about this "6 feet" rule. I mean, it logically makes sense to distance yourself from potentially sick people, right? Of course it does! But why 6 feet? Why so specifically 6 feet? Why doesn't it change with new information?
Makes me kinda wonder if they needed 6 feet of space between people (for whatever reason) from the get go and now have never changed it because they can't.
Incidentally, I noticed my wireless keyboard gets a little flaky depending on where it is.
originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
a reply to: hombero
Because it's not a reinfection. If you have 3 tests for the SAME infection, that is counted as 3 new cases. It's not, it's one new case.