Adam Schiff knew about the whistleblower in advance, may have helped write the complaint

originally posted by: thedigirati
a reply to: 1947boomer

correct, they even waited 4 days after the form was changed.

Oh wait you didn't include that the information submitted was second hand.

why?

was it an oversite on your part or was it on purpose.

and yes, it's quite relevant.

Just like the Emails that exposed the DNC deceit were stolen, but the question is was it Rich or Russia.

that was never really cleared up.

but again, why did you overlook the fact the the WB information is not first hand?

Allegedly, the WB originally said it WAS first hand and second hand knowledge
but the form only says second hand now.

Spin spin spin
They cant spin this away
Schiff should go to jail.

[SNIPPED] Schiff needs to immediately recuse himself from
all investigations having to do with Ukraine, then
he should be investigated and resign.

Hopefully someone will take this opportunity to
file an ethics complaint against him.

originally posted by: thedigirati
a reply to: smurfy

Sedition includes resistance to a qualified authority.

the left has been screaming resistance since before President Trump took Office, the Next day after Trump won the election they were screaming "resist"

You can scream all day, that makes no difference..burden of proof is in the doing of.

Schiff learning how to Whistle Dixie 😎

a reply to: xuenchen

Schiff is now a "fact witness" who must recuse himself from the Whistleblower saga.

twitter.com...

a reply to: carewemust

I agree


Avenatti would be a good lawyer for Schiff.


they give off the same Aura.

Schiff is jealous of President Trumps full head of hair😲😲🍘👱‍♂️👱‍♂️

a reply to: thedigirati

However, there must be a TON of guilty Republicans too.

twitter.com...

This is NOT the Mud Pit!!!

All rules for polite political debate will be enforced.
Reaffirming Our Desire For Productive Political Debate (REVISED)
[I encourage members to read the above link ASAP!!!!!!!!!]

You are responsible for your own posts.....those who ignore that responsibility will face mod actions.


and, as always:

Do NOT reply to this post!!

So what if, in Obama fashion, the US Congress has now tapped the phones at the White House. This whole thing stinks to high hell... time to investigate all of them.

originally posted by: queenofswords
a reply to: AndyFromMichigan

Everybody knew this stunk to high heaven. Adam Schiff is going to get what he deserves. He is a snake, a corrupt lyin' deceitful crooked politician.

There's more that is going to come out about him. But, this little stunt is going to take him down. The rest that will come out is probably going to lock him up.

No doubt Shifty has been the low life lyin' weasel he has recently shown himself to be his entire life...Now that he put himself into the crosshairs, I suspect we're going to be flooded with his illegal shenanigans...

Some chatter indicating the WB may be a ghost employee that doesn't exist.

Disposable Identity was deployed 😎 🐇

Actors in place for the charade 😎🐇

a reply to: 1947boomer

sweet glad you posted from the DNI site.. lets look a little more into that.

From the same site www.dni.gov...

The "Right People" are those known as "authorized recipient(s)". Authorized recipients include: 1) a government supervisor in the employee`s chain of command, up to and including the head of the employing agency; 2) the IG of the employing agency or IC Element; 3) the Director of National Intelligence (DNI); 4) the ICIG; 5) an employee designated by any of the above officials for the purpose of receiving such disclosures. Authorized recipients are those individuals who can correct the wrongdoing that is reported to them. Inherent in that concept is that anyone without a clearance, or who is not in government, would not be an authorized recipient.

In this case Schiff is not the right person they went to the IG first thus the case was confidential

www.dni.gov...

Now if its like anything else in the government once you decide to take matters into your own hands as the WB did with the letter directly to Schiff the complaint should no longer be confidential.

originally posted by: dfnj2015
It's too bad Trump admitted he broke the law.

Really?

All rules for filing the complaint were followed to the letter.

This is just, what?, distraction number 110 in this issue where trump wants to cloud the issue with bull?

It's getting worse by the day.

a reply to: Sillyolme

it was filed correctly, but everything is null and void once the WB went to a staff member telling them about it. this circumvents the chain of command and they no longer should have a confidential case. Now if its proven that the WB had zero contact with anyone on Schiff's team then yes I will agree with you. But as of now that is not the case.

originally posted by: Stealu1two
a reply to: 1947boomer

sweet glad you posted from the DNI site.. lets look a little more into that.

From the same site www.dni.gov...

The "Right People" are those known as "authorized recipient(s)". Authorized recipients include: 1) a government supervisor in the employee`s chain of command, up to and including the head of the employing agency; 2) the IG of the employing agency or IC Element; 3) the Director of National Intelligence (DNI); 4) the ICIG; 5) an employee designated by any of the above officials for the purpose of receiving such disclosures. Authorized recipients are those individuals who can correct the wrongdoing that is reported to them. Inherent in that concept is that anyone without a clearance, or who is not in government, would not be an authorized recipient.

In this case Schiff is not the right person they went to the IG first thus the case was confidential

www.dni.gov...

Now if its like anything else in the government once you decide to take matters into your own hands as the WB did with the letter directly to Schiff the complaint should no longer be confidential.

thanks for that
the actual rules/procedures often bring clarity

The legality of the "impeachment inquiry" is now officially in question.
gop-foreignaffairs.house.gov...
This event is falling apart quickly.
Too bad once again the dems think they are above and do not have to follow the rules.

a reply to: AndyFromMichigan

Also, remember that he wanted to question the "whistleblower" in a secret setting, with no Republicans present. This would have been an extraordinary action that would violate every rule of fairness, due process, etc, that can possibly be imagined. Now it's clear why he wanted to do that: He couldn't risk someone like Devin Nunes asking a question that would expose the whole thing as a fraud.

apparently they are trying to do the same thing with volker today?
nothing but shady dirty tricks from these people.

if it is as bad as you say it is let the sun shine dems!

How are tax payers ok with giving these elected officials a paycheck for trying to undermine the president.