It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: ArMaP
originally posted by: ChefFox
a reply to: ArMaP
But in general Libyans aren't Africans/African.
Could you explain what you mean by that? How can someone from Africa not be African?
Thanks in advance.
originally posted by: pavil
There is a distinct difference between North Africa and Sub Saharan Africa.
The Berbers were assimilated by the Arab Invasions of the late 600's.
originally posted by: ChefFox
Libya is still being used as a excuse for many of these Sub Saharan African migrants when considering they aren't part of the Libyan population.
They also want to give these migrants human rights even if they do commit a crime.
What do you mean by Libya being used as an excuse?
Even criminals have human rights. In Portugal, the only right a criminal loses temporally is freedom, all other rights remain.
originally posted by: ChefFox
Now MSM are portraying many of these Sub Saharan African migrants as actual "Libyan Migrants, fleeing Libya and Libyan torturers"
By your logic, criminals should have human rights but no justice for their victims?
originally posted by: ArMaP
originally posted by: pavil
Why not all of them?
I don't know, but Portugal is a small country, six times smaller than Italy in population.
We have had cases of refugees coming to Portugal and trying to leave to another country because we are too poor.
originally posted by: pavil
You are proving the point that these people aren't refugees fleeing death.