No, That's not Mueller Witness George Nader in Beach Photo with Bill Clinton

a reply to: Wide-Eyes

a reply to: Wide-Eyes

I ignored this piece to be honest, something just didn't "jive", glad I followed my instinct.

Usually these kinds of things are fake news.

Good Job TruePundit, I try to give you guys a shot and somewhat still am, but with extreme vetting, but these kinds of things cannot be happening. Don't be like Liberal Media. Shame on you TP.

s+f

a reply to: Wide-Eyes



For comparison purposes.

originally posted by: joemoe
a reply to: LDragonFire

I think that's the lesson we should all know by now. The swamp exists in both blue and red. There are also many Deep State operatives active in Trump's administration. Some are there to sabotage the administration others are there to act as a guiding hand for the Deep State agenda from within.

Nah, Trump drained the swamp. He said so. You can tell by the legions of quality people with whom he's surrounded himself.

Your coming back party source is True Pundit?

One of their other headlines right now is "the queen smiled at Trump"!

Lol

Notice you had no comments a few months ago trying to get ahead of Rachel Maddow screaming that Russian collusion was a fact when we all knew that it wasnt....

You were also very silent when the Mueller report came out debunking most of what you had been claiming as fact for 2 years!!!!

So you come back with a fake news story from 2011 about Bill Clinton and you want to make sure no one believes it....

Lol

a reply to: Scepticaldem

Well Ante wasn't intellectually stimulated lol. Said it right there on the first page.

Ante is above such nonsense as admitting that he believed lies.

It's not intellectually challenging enough.

Never saw the bus coming...

Criminals.



Scapegoat.

originally posted by: projectvxn

originally posted by: network dude
a reply to: theantediluvian

way to get ahead of the story.

When will you be doing a thread on the corruption at the FBI, DOJ, and the rest? Or is that not all that important?

I think it's perfectly appropriate to call out fake news regardless of where it comes from.

It doesn't have to be done to the exclusion of any other news. Seems like a pretty weak criticism of the OP.

it wasn't criticizing the OP at all. I gave him kudos for getting ahead of the story.

My irritation comes with someone who has the ability to research, debate and report things much better than others, but choose to ignore the things that might go against their warm fuzzy place. I go for low hanging fruit, I know my limitation. If Anti decided to investigate the wrongness of what took place, a good number of leftovers would take notice and possibly realize what actually happened. Thus unifying at least a small portion of us again.

But I don't want Anti to get a big head, at least not any bigger than it already is.

a reply to: theantediluvian

Well just know you were missed.
And I feel ya. I log on read the recent list and log off very often.
But then the weak and back sliding in me just takes over and I am eyeball deep in the muck again.

I hope you can stomach it enough to log on more often.

I remember when they took all his devices! It was when they held him up I think at Dulles on his way to someplace in Texas if memory serves. Just took lap tops and phones.

That was right after they had raided Manaforts homes.
I wonder if Mueller, knowing Naders history with kiddie porn plucked his devices in hopes of finding something to negotiate testimony with?

a reply to: burdman30ott6

giggle.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: theantediluvian

Well just know you were missed.
And I feel ya. I log on read the recent list and log off very often.
But then the weak and back sliding in me just takes over and I am eyeball deep in the muck again.

I hope you can stomach it enough to log on more often.

I remember when they took all his devices! It was when they held him up I think at Dulles on his way to someplace in Texas if memory serves. Just took lap tops and phones.

Lol

Also didnt admit they have TDS....

When yall 2 admit that Russian collusion wasnt a real thing after 2 years of swearing it was, you will get credibility back....

Anti coming back with this thread is embarrassing after not eating crow about everything he was wrong about.

That is why we are having a hard time with him not being "INTELLECTUALLY STIMULATED "

LOL

a reply to: theantediluvian

Welcome back. We have missed you.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: burdman30ott6

giggle.

Giggle?

Any thoughts on Steele being interrogated by the US government soon?

You and anti both stood by his dossier until now, are you still sure that was legit?

Lol

That is why anti coming back this way is an intellectual folicy....

Lol

originally posted by: Wide-Eyes
a reply to: Scepticaldem

Well Ante wasn't intellectually stimulated lol. Said it right there on the first page.

Ante is above such nonsense as admitting that he believed lies.

It's not intellectually challenging enough.

What lies are those? The Mueller report went almost exactly how I expected. I said from the start that I didn't believe that Trump had colluded with the Russians. I also said that if anyone went down, it would be Manafort (and Gates).

I got most of what I wanted from the Mueller investigation between Manafort going down and the indictments over the phishing/hacking/theft of emails. Would you like to discuss how many Trump supporters jumped at every red herring, refusing to believe that the Russians were behind it?

Go back and actually read some of my threads and then follow up. You don't have to like me or agree with my opinions but you'll find that most of the folks I've posted about — that Trump supporters ignored — did flip, were indicted, have pleaded guilty, are under investigation, have resigned, etc.

Has Disgraced Nat Sec Advisor Lt. Gen Michael Flynn Cut A Deal With The FBI? (Mar, 26 2017) - Took a while but he took the deal and pleaded guilty months later.

Report: Rick Gates Finalizing Deal with Mueller ( Feb, 15 2018) - Gates did in fact finalized that deal 9 days later.

New Emails Evidence Manafort/Calk Quid Pro Quo - Loans for Admin Appointment (Aug, 14 2018) - And what came of that just two weeks ago? Ex-bank CEO charged with lending millions to Paul Manafort in exchange for help getting Trump White House job

Another Bombshell from the Trump Swamp: Broidy and Nader's Anti-Qatar Scheme (May, 22 2018) - How's that developed since? A couple months later it was reported that he was under investigation. In March, it was revealed from a sealed warrant that his offices were raided. He's going down.

Nader just got arrested, though to be fair it was for kiddie porn.

Evidence of Collusion Was Revealed In October (Jan, 30 2018) - Thread's actually about Manafort and his lieutenant Konstantin Kilimnik. Anyone else talking about Kilimnik? He was indicted five months later for obstruction and in January of this year, it was revealed (accidentally by Manafort's attorneys) that Manafort had shared internal polling data with him (Paul Manafort shared 2016 presidential polling data with ex-Russian agent: Feds).

And then of course there are all the threads about the DNC/DCCC hack. How'd that turn out? Did Mueller find that Seth Rich gave WikiLeaks the emails? No, of course not. It was the Russians.

So I don't feel like there's anything I need to own up to.

a reply to: theantediluvian

Why do we care if this guy is Nader? Literally changes nothing. Where is the collusion Lebowski?

a reply to: Scepticaldem

You have tried two different approaches to derail this thread.
First was to critique Ante with your contemptuous rhetoric.
Then when that didnt work you try to make it about Steele.
I posted in that thread. Go there and read it.
This thread is about a witness in the Mueller probe who had kiddie porn on his devices and maybe how Mueller might have known it if you want to make a conspiracy out of it.
The thread is about that photo that shows Clinton with a man incorrectly identified as the pedophile that has been arrested.
I personally think you have a lot of material right here to speak about without sliding another topic in under the door.

Nader is a pretty rich topic in and of himself.
Why was Mueller interested in him in the first place?
Suspected of being the go to link between the trump transition team and the kremlin through his relationship with Kirill Dmitriev, a Russian banker.
And remember that second meeting at trump tower? No? Yeah there was one that included the crown prince of Abu Dhabi.
what about the meeting way out there in the indian ocean in the Seychelles to discuss a back channel?
Any of those things ring a bell?

Dont think you have material here to talk about?

The dude is mentioned over and over again in the Mueller report.

a reply to: drewlander

Glad you mentioned that....

Because Mueller had insufficient evidence and he said that people lied and destroyed records.

I believe this issue has not yet been put to bed by the FBI or the judiciary committee in the senate.

Only by Mueller who has stated that witnesses lied to him.