It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: luthier
a reply to: network dude
Maybe trump shouldn't have picked up so many self interested grifters and it would never have had an investigation.
In fact if he didn't pick sessions this never would have happened.
originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: luthier
This is my take as a political cynic.
Which is why I recommended a simple bit of research.
What the investigation made clear is Trump is exactly like everyone before him just less polished and didn't use the normal group of political opportunists he used his own.
really
is that so?
how much executive privilege did trump use to cover his tracks?
you understand ALL of his and his staffs communications are covered by such?
just like everybody else....so says the investigation....mkay whatever you say bub
originally posted by: network dude
originally posted by: luthier
a reply to: network dude
Maybe trump shouldn't have picked up so many self interested grifters and it would never have had an investigation.
In fact if he didn't pick sessions this never would have happened.
setting aside your hatred for Trump, do you think Trump came to Washington and knew who to call and who to hire, or do you think he got some "advice" on key positions? I only ask, because it seems his campaign was infiltrated, and likely his advisers weren't all looking out for HIS best interests.
If you read about the initial entrance to the white house, Trump had NO idea what he was doing, and the usual helpers we not fans of his. They enjoyed watching him look inept. You don't have to even like him to see that he was treated a bit differently than previous candidates. And I'm not saying he and his attitude didn't deserve it, just that the bias existed and his treatment was not on par with others.
If you watched the video in the OP, it's clear that George was targeted and what he was allowed to see, was indeed a coup attempt. As with any coup, if it's successful, then no crimes occurred, only a rightful takeover. But a failed coup is vastly different. And again, you don't have to like Trump to see that this is where the facts point.
originally posted by: luthier
originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: luthier
This is my take as a political cynic.
Which is why I recommended a simple bit of research.
What the investigation made clear is Trump is exactly like everyone before him just less polished and didn't use the normal group of political opportunists he used his own.
really
is that so?
how much executive privilege did trump use to cover his tracks?
you understand ALL of his and his staffs communications are covered by such?
just like everybody else....so says the investigation....mkay whatever you say bub
Lol. It's ok if you keep at it you may be able to beat the far left Democrats. Then we still have historic deficits (never have we accumulated so much debt and expansion at the same time), still no healthcare plan, no realistic border plan, a divided public, people not joining the workforce (not included in employment numbers), crumbling infrastructure and no leader.
originally posted by: luthier
a reply to: shooterbrody
No but it's his words right. Not exactly a neutural source or even a person of integrity worth listening to.
Like the libs going all in on Cohen. The fact many trump supporters (not trump voters who didn't want Hillary or a liberal nutjob) have not waken up to he was surrounded by scumbags who skirt the law like career politicians would.
originally posted by: luthier
a reply to: network dude
The president never even met this guy I thought?
originally posted by: Tartuffe
originally posted by: luthier
a reply to: shooterbrody
No but it's his words right. Not exactly a neutural source or even a person of integrity worth listening to.
Like the libs going all in on Cohen. The fact many trump supporters (not trump voters who didn't want Hillary or a liberal nutjob) have not waken up to he was surrounded by scumbags who skirt the law like career politicians would.
Neutral source? But you’re singing and defending the official tune as it was conceived by the CIA and the FBI.
originally posted by: olaru12
Bearded fat guys with a youtube channel. Watch out fox and CNN....
originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: luthier
usual?
so that then makes trump amateur and unusual right?
so you rail against the usual and unusual now?
well done