It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: ConfusedBrit
originally posted by: celltypespecific
We are essentially in the beginning of the socialization process regarding "UAP's".
So where better to start this 'socialisation process' than with right-wing conspiracy theorists like Glenn Beck?
I agree, Spock - not exactly a genius move by the Mellon Man.
originally posted by: karl 12
a reply to: Willtell
Classic bait and switch?
You've probably seen it before mate but there's some good info on this thread about Pope's AIRSEC2A group being situated right at bottom of the hierarchical set up (and his basic role as a P.R. talking head puppet).
Cheers.
2.) Many public commentators, FOIA filers, "Ufologist" on this issue are greatly ignorant of the real world legal & regulatory issues which govern this in DOD. Someone who does not either study or has real world experience in dealing with this will be played a fool by DOD.
originally posted by: Baablacksheep
a reply to: celltypespecific
Would Kit Green really go on Twitter and pretend to be a mystery man to enchant us and become Mr Greywood. Is that the kind of thing Kit would do in his spare time? What about Eric Davies ,would he really do something like that? Over to you Cellty. Do you believe that?
originally posted by: mirageman
a reply to: celltypespecific
Seems to me that the whole crux of this is that US taxpayers got duped into paying Robert Bigelow $22m so that 3 videos could be released into the public domain.
originally posted by: Baablacksheep
Would Kit Green really go on Twitter and pretend to be a mystery man to enchant us and become Mr Greywood. Is that the kind of thing Kit would do in his spare time? What about Eric Davies ,would he really do something like that?
I don't know if it's him or not, but remember we now know that Green was involved in promoting the SERPO hoax. As was Puthoff. As was Doty. Hmmmmm.
"The video you are about to see seems to be a FLIR-hud-vision captured by one of the jets, that were sent out to intercept the unknown object. The materials we (me and one other ATS member who wished to remain nameless) used for this analysis/post were this video, an event-log and a power-point-presentation, but the information included in there has not been worked out yet.The files we have can be released on demand."
"The powerpoints though I cant recall the details, had all sorts of sonar and sonic charts to it. There was a map of the area and I know for a fact that all the names of the places where completely made up. Times and dates where in some weird code."
originally posted by: pigsy2400
If you take the Navy's word for it in terms of what is shown in the videos is "Unidentified" - I think that is the only point that many can agree on. However, there are other aspects to this and I believe the Videos are the "shiny thing" that has your attention when other areas demand it more.
TheFinalTheory
"The video you are about to see seems to be a FLIR-hud-vision captured by one of the jets, that were sent out to intercept the unknown object. The materials we (me and one other ATS member who wished to remain nameless) used for this analysis/post were this video, an event-log and a power-point-presentation, but the information included in there has not been worked out yet.The files we have can be released on demand."
If you look at the first thread that TFT wrote, it states that there were multiple Powerpoint files. More;
"The powerpoints though I cant recall the details, had all sorts of sonar and sonic charts to it. There was a map of the area and I know for a fact that all the names of the places where completely made up. Times and dates where in some weird code."
In terms of "who else had these files" - one other person is referenced as having copies of them in the original thread.
Questions;
1) Where are the PowerPoint Files now?
2) Are those Briefing Slides as mentioned by NAVAIR as being Classified "Top Secret" in their possession in relation to the incident and with the video the same ones referenced in the original 2007 post?
3) Whats more important;
a) Videos that are deemed "unidentified" and do not display "sources and methods"?
OR
b) Ensuring that any other supporting detailed documentation that contains potentially Classified Information is recovered and returned to its owner?
People can argue about a blurry dot all they want, it will not go anywhere. If I was the Navy I "would" have been far more concerned with potentially Classified Information being out there in the wild. In this case, why does hardly anyone speak of these other files?
The reason why I have been on ATS for the past two years is because of TheFinaltheory and the initial release of the vidoes and the powerpoint slides.