Purchase & Deployment of HI Speed cameras To catch a UFO going Mach 7 It worked before!

You won’t dare to invest a huge chunk of money on high speed cams to just take shots of what you call UFO, no one sane does!

You are not allowed to publish something that its REAL existence still is under the question. And if so, you’ll get a short visit by the authorities (MIB), get your cam and the materials confiscated, let alone you’ll be defamed down to a "rat status" publicly! If persistence, you’ll get arrested in charge of positions of narcotics, perhaps paedophilia or rape…


All this, because of you want to document something forbidden, is that fun…?

a reply to: Qumulys

Hey matey, thanks very much for the excellent reply ... that's 'close enough' for my puposes

it has been definitely appreciated by me

keep up the great work

originally posted by: TheJesuit
Thoughts ATS?

1. Purchase camera of sufficient resolution to actually see something.
2. Put it in a place where you can see a UFO fairly close. Not just dots, please.
3. Make sure it maintains power and is safe.
4. Record 24/7?
5. Go back every day and review the footage in detail to see if anything is on it.
6. If something is on it, try to determine if it's natural, artificial, Air Force, whatever. Like you know.
7. Post on ATS.
8. Get debunked.

Seems like a lot of money, time and effort. Here's a webcam in Colorado. Get watching. Some of them run all night long, others shut down.
www.coloradowebcam.net...

originally posted by: Blue Shift

originally posted by: TheJesuit
Thoughts ATS?

1. Purchase camera of sufficient resolution to actually see something.
2. Put it in a place where you can see a UFO fairly close. Not just dots, please.
3. Make sure it maintains power and is safe.
4. Record 24/7?
5. Go back every day and review the footage in detail to see if anything is on it.
6. If something is on it, try to determine if it's natural, artificial, Air Force, whatever. Like you know.
7. Post on ATS.
8. Get debunked.

6 1/2. Don't incorrectly assume (like the mistake made by the aviation expert in the news story) that just because an object crosses the field of view of the camera very quickly that it means that that object was moving at a speed impossibly fast for known objects.

originally posted by: Soylent Green Is People

originally posted by: Blue Shift

originally posted by: TheJesuit
Thoughts ATS?

1. Purchase camera of sufficient resolution to actually see something.
2. Put it in a place where you can see a UFO fairly close. Not just dots, please.
3. Make sure it maintains power and is safe.
4. Record 24/7?
5. Go back every day and review the footage in detail to see if anything is on it.
6. If something is on it, try to determine if it's natural, artificial, Air Force, whatever. Like you know.
7. Post on ATS.
8. Get debunked.

6 1/2. Don't incorrectly assume (like the mistake made by the aviation expert in the news story) that just because an object crosses the field of view of the camera very quickly that it means that that object was moving at a speed impossibly fast for known objects.

Images are nice, and entertaining. But to have any value at all they have to be backed up by something physical that has a solid chain of evidence that can be linked back to the UFO / image. It also has to be verified by multiple independent examiners as being "not from around here." Otherwise, it's just the same old junk that gets filed away and forgotten.

a reply to: TheJesuit

Glad you enjoyed it.

Personally, I wouldn't set out to spend 100s or 1000s of hours skywatching for UFOs. Many have tried and what do we have to show for their efforts? A few controversial moments is all.

If you have a couple of grand to spare, it's probably better to save it for the next recession lol. On a lighter note, you could spend a couple hundred driving top-end cars round a track for an afternoon. One of them will be a memory and talking point for life and the other a waste of time and money. 'Decent' UFO sightings are probably greater odds than winning the lottery which could also mean you'd be better off spending the money on lotto tickets.