It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: lakenheath24
a reply to: watchitburn
That could go for 99% of officials. Look at that fool from Hawaii claiming border patrol used chemical weapons.
My point is, gimme NEWS not OPINIONS! This is one of the things I detest about our economy though, the news has been hijacked by corporations, so opinions have replaced facts.
originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: lakenheath24
Clearly they have to stay in Mexico, and I think any progressive should back me up on this. The US is just not safe for them and their poor, poor children. We have way too many gun nuts on the street. They might be shot at any minute in one of the millions upon trillions of mass shootings that occur every day here.
Don't they know? It's Aramageddon in the US and far, far worse than what they left.
originally posted by: lakenheath24
a reply to: LSU2018
Congrats on that win BTW, 7 overtimes! Christ, those boys will need a break after that.(I assume that is LSU tigers)
originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: Irishhaf
Many of these caravan refugees are running for their lives.
originally posted by: Alien Abduct
a reply to: crayzeed
They have to apply for refugee status in the first safe country they land in.
I remember you stated in another thread that this was international law or UN law or something. could you cite this law for me?
You aren't required to apply in any safe third country before applying for Refugee or Asylum status with the U.S., BUT, you may have to prove that IF you were in a safe third country, why you were not able to stay there and ask for Refugee or Asylum status.
I assume you mean the caravan that is coming up. I cannot get into a political discussion about this, but the grand majority are not going to be let in because they are coming for economic reasons, not for Asylum/Refugee status. They will not be able to pass a credible fear interview and will not be let in.
People don't understand the reality. The reality is that most of the persons coming will not be let in. Some will be let in that are able to convince an officer that they are in danger of persecution because of their race, nationality, religion, social group or political opinion. And of those that are let in, most will eventually be sent back.
There is nothing in international law to say that refugees must claim asylum in the first country they reach. A European regulation allows a country such as the UK to return an adult asylum seeker to the first European country they reached. This means that countries on the edge of Europe have responsibility for a lot more asylum seekers than others. Some of the countries through which people travel to get to Europe are not safe places and many have not signed the Refugee Convention, meaning that people who remain there will not get international protection and be able to rebuild their lives.