wildfire victims prevented from returning over health concerns

Butte County Officials Establish “Health Advisory” Predicate To Block All Property Owners From Returning

Agenda 21 at play here to remove residents from areas affected by the Camp Fires that devastated Northern California. In the guise of health concerns warnings will become policy and people will be banned from living in those areas. That is the goal under Agenda 21, we'll see if they will get away with it or not.

Butte County – Dr. Andy Miller, Butte County Health Officer, has issued a hazard advisory strongly suggesting no habitation of destroyed property until property is declared clear of hazardous waste and structural ash and debris by Butte County Environmental Health.

There is evidence from recent fires in California that homes and property destroyed by fire contain high and concerning levels of heavy metals, lead, mercury, dioxin, arsenic, and other carcinogens. Some property may have the presence of radio-active materials. Exposure to hazardous substances may lead to acute and chronic health effects, and may cause long-term public health and environmental impacts.


As areas affected by the fire with destroyed homes and property are opened to residents, residents will have limited access to visit property to collect recognizable belongings and mementoes that may have survived the fire. Residents should review the Health and Safety Precaution for Re-entry packet, which will be distributed at controlled re-entry checkpoints.

Paradise has only 3 roads that lead in and out of town with mountains on either side.

I can see them condemning the entire area and forcing those who didnt lose their homes out for their "safety". Radioactivity? No sorry, we can't allow you to go home. Think it can't happen? We will see.

theconservativetreehouse.com... /

21 is what I thought of when I saw that article too.

a reply to: Asktheanimals

Well, what the hell?

Unless they know something we don't. Perhaps we should be asking what bombs were used.

This needs to be watched closely. Radiation? From what, all of those fire and smoke detectors?

Ash is now dangerous? So much for cleaning the fire place.

Some of those pics are unusual. Where did all the fridges, water heaters, ovens and washing machines go. They don't get burnt to nothing.

P

Its terrifying we allow our government to protect us from ourselves. I believe Thomas Jefferson said "I prefer a dangerous freedom over a peaceful slavery."

originally posted by: pheonix358
a reply to: Asktheanimals

Well, what the hell?

Unless they know something we don't. Perhaps we should be asking what bombs were used.

This needs to be watched closely. Radiation? From what, all of those fire and smoke detectors?

Ash is now dangerous? So much for cleaning the fire place.

Some of those pics are unusual. Where did all the fridges, water heaters, ovens and washing machines go. They don't get burnt to nothing.

P

Not to mention the many pics of one house untouched but surrounded on all sides by scorched earth and everything else.

a reply to: Asktheanimals

What part of Agenda 21 would this be catering to?

It's no longer Agenda 21 but Agenda 2030 now. However, said to be similar. The three ways in or out, it was a known issue in a fire concern area not taken care of. Let alone the electric company not turning off the electric when it was reported to be sparking and of course in a very dry environment. See the law suit from last year as well.

If this area was really targeted either by electric company causing it for an agenda or other, a known retiree are also known for being one of the last affordable places to live in the state, there's no words for how they were targeted in a death trap.

The count is at eighty-one deceased, 870 still missing-albeit some may be incorrectly reported-or at least one dan hope there's not that many missing/desceased. Now that there's fear with the incoming rain about washing away the remains of the missing(one source). It's speculated it might never be known how many are really missing.

Combine all of that with the current op news, and the past news of officials not sure if people will ever return/rebuilt,this all amounts to a perfect crime.

a reply to: KansasGirl

Not to mention the many pics of one house untouched but surrounded on all sides by scorched earth and everything else.

I have seen that many times, wild fires can do that. These houses are far enough apart so that one may burn and another not. If your house and yard are clear of burnables then your house has a much better chance of survival. A stack of paper or cardboard against timber siding will get you every time.

Additionally, fire fighters and water bombers can do wonders.

But disappearing white goods is vastly different.

P

originally posted by: KansasGirl
a reply to: Asktheanimals

What part of Agenda 21 would this be catering to?

The Wildlands project, a UN wish list for areas in the US where no human habitation is allowed. Oddly enough, the wildfires burned areas match those human red-zones on the map (made in the early 90s).

Follow the links in this post for the fire map.
www.abovetopsecret.com...

Last line on the Georgia guidestones:
Leave room for nature, leave room for nature.

a reply to: pheonix358

Micro Wave Radiation ......Hmm.....Burns Buildings from the Inside Out .

Here's our first homeowner arrested for attempting to go home:

This Camp Fire evacuee was arrested in Paradise for trying to go home

a reply to: Asktheanimals

That is just insidious.

The excuses for keeping people out don't make any sense.

Radioactivity?

Luckily he was not shot to death for trying to get back home.

This is what their dystopian future looks like.

P

originally posted by: KansasGirl
a reply to: Asktheanimals

What part of Agenda 21 would this be catering to?

I believe that would be the part about moving people off the land and into city's were they can be more easily controlled and CULLED.

Yes, radiation, from this:

In fact, from July 12 through July 26, 1959, an unknown amount of radioactive gases were intentionally vented to prevent the Sodium Reactor Experiment from overheating and exploding.

50 YEARS AFTER AMERICA'S WORST NUCLEAR MELTDOWN

Any fallout from that event could have been resuspsmeded by the fire and the resultant soot would then be radioactive.

a reply to: jadedANDcynical

That is interesting, what was below the ground would not be a problem but any taken up by plant life via there root system's and then turned into ash would be a potential hazard, how much of a hazard though is open to debate, did the area already have a higher than average cancer rate?.

a reply to: LABTECH767

At least one seems to have been attributed to this:

Throughout the years, about ten low-power nuclear reactors operated at SSFL, in addition to several "critical facilities" that helped develop nuclear science and applications. At least four of the ten nuclear reactors had accidents during their operation. The reactors located on the grounds of SSFL were considered experimental, and therefore, had no containment structures.

The site ceased research and development operations in 2006. The years of rocket testing, nuclear reactor testing, and liquid metal research have left the site "significantly contaminated". Environmental cleanup is ongoing.

On March 30, 2018, a 7-year-old girl living in Simi Valley died of neuroblastoma, prompting public urging to thoroughly clean up the site.

wikipedia

The site has been a soup of toxic nastiness going back half a century or more. Not just uncontained reactors, but the rocket tests as well as other poisonous substances (heavy metals) have long since seeped into much of the biota in the area. Having some of the area affected by the fire, it is a near certainty that some of those toxic substances would have been in some of that smoke and soot.

If I were in the area, I would probably heed the warnings of potential health effects and at the least use a good quality respirator and painters suit as well as thoroughly cleaning anything I brought out of the area. Might look into a Geiger counter.

originally posted by: jadedANDcynical
Yes, radiation, from this:

In fact, from July 12 through July 26, 1959, an unknown amount of radioactive gases were intentionally vented to prevent the Sodium Reactor Experiment from overheating and exploding.

50 YEARS AFTER AMERICA'S WORST NUCLEAR MELTDOWN

Any fallout from that event could have been resuspsmeded by the fire and the resultant soot would then be radioactive.

This is near LA in Santa Susanna as a result of the Woolsey fire (for those who weren't aware). The camp fire was the one that burned Paradise down.

Looks like a ploy used in multiple situations now doesn't it?
I don't like the pattern I'm seeing.

a reply to: Asktheanimals

Ok, thank you for that additional info. I didn't know it was in a different area of the state.

a reply to: LABTECH767

Cancer map of California (all types, all ages)
statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov...

Simi Valley NW of LA has higher rates.

a reply to: Asktheanimals

Yikes.