Fat police lock up Chris

Originally posted by kazi
Hor, I've decided to ignore you, and when I do I hope it's forvever. Why would anyne wanting a little liberal-conservative back and forth give you any attention? I never want to see that republican you-know-what dripping off your lower lip again.

I am sorry if you choose to ignore me, it will be a great loss to the future discussion. I do value your opinion even if I disagree. I am not a republican anyway. I am against big government, the entire "nanny" state mentality. This is a prime example of the big gov nanny state point of view of so many "liberals'.

If you do choose to ignore it is a loss to the world and me personally. But its your choice. Words and debate are important.

Ok, first, UK NOT US, second, wtf does liberal vs conservative have to do with anything? Not even the same country.

Second, if a manic deprission person cuts themselves, it is legal to call for a mental facility to take them away to help them. This guy was "cutting" himself again and again and again. You can eat so much that you cause kidney, liver, whatever failure.

ANyways, not going to use ignore, only the weak use ignore, I am not weak, even i this guy makes Bush look like a Genisus, can't use ignore, it funny to laugh at people with the blinders on this tight.

Originally posted by James the Lesser
Ok, first, UK NOT US, second, wtf does liberal vs conservative have to do with anything? Not even the same country.

Second, if a manic deprission person cuts themselves, it is legal to call for a mental facility to take them away to help them. This guy was "cutting" himself again and again and again. You can eat so much that you cause kidney, liver, whatever failure.

ANyways, not going to use ignore, only the weak use ignore, I am not weak, even i this guy makes Bush look like a Genisus, can't use ignore, it funny to laugh at people with the blinders on this tight.

So by your logic the planet should outlaw all automobiles, drugs, or anything else that causes human death. No more salt on YOUR food because you "might" get high blood pressure.

Where does it end there bunnyboy? Who draws the line?

Originally posted by Ocelot
Question. Why the F*** does everything have to be Liberal vs Conservatives? I mean it seems to me that this has no relevance to the topic at hand whatsoever.

Because that is how Dr Horacid and other extremists see the world..

- Attero

Originally posted by Attero Auctorita


Because that is how Dr Horacid and other extremists see the world..

- Attero

Try using the happy button! I only have three on it, but I no longer have to deal with their, how should I say..."views" anymore, which delights the hell outa me! Makes me a happy!

Originally posted by DrHoracid
Does national 'socialist" party mean anything? errr NAZI. Hitler was a leftist "socialist". And NO ONE should pay anyone elses medical bills. There should be no Governement nor third party (insurance) whatsoever.

What is socialist about a privite insurance company? Are you saying that free enterprise should not be allowed?

By Dr HoracidDoes national 'socialist" party mean anything? errr NAZI. Hitler was a leftist "socialist"

That Hitler was a "leftist" is an argument only made by the uneducated.

Hitler viewed Socialism as part of the "Jewish conspiracy" Many of the leaders of Socialism in Germany were Jews and the leaders of the Russian revolution were Jews. Karl Marx was also a Jew. He also claimed 75% of all Communists were Jews.

Hitler was a German Nationalist who was horrified when Bavaria was declared a Socialist republic. When the Bavarian Socialist Republic was overthrown Hitler was arrested along with other soldiers and was accused of being a Socialist. He was let off when he managed to convince the authorities he had been an opponent of the regime. He then helped track down soldiers who had been part of the regime and because of his severe dislike of leftist ideals was made a political officer lecturing soldiers on politics.

The adding of 'socialist' to the name of the Nazi party was Hitler’s idea, but was a purely political maneuver designed to take advantage of the popularity of socialism at that time. His Justification was that the adding of 'Nationalist' would make it clear that the only equality on offer would be to pure blood Germans.

At the beginning of the Nazi party Hitler went on with his speeches ranting against Jews and left wing opponents, and his calls for violence against them were carried out by his SA (mostly made up of the disbanded armies of the right wing Freikorps) and as the attacks were mostly against Communists and Socialists at the start the local right wing Bavarian government didn’t take any action against him. Later the sheer number and violence of Nazi attacks against Socialists and Communists lost the party some support.

There’s far much more evidence of Hitler’s far right ideals, though thankfully it’s common knowledge for most.

You might also have noticed that modern day Neo Nazis are far right, and the other western groups that idolise Hitler are...umm... far right.

Originally posted by LadyV

Originally posted by Attero Auctorita


Because that is how Dr Horacid and other extremists see the world..

- Attero

Try using the happy button! I only have three on it, but I no longer have to deal with their, how should I say..."views" anymore, which delights the hell outa me! Makes me a happy!

Coward

But I still love ya.................misguided as you are..........

Originally posted by kazi
Hor, I've decided to ignore you, and when I do I hope it's forvever. Why would anyne wanting a little liberal-conservative back and forth give you any attention? I never want to see that republican you-know-what dripping off your lower lip again.

if you're going to ignore someone, just do it. We don't need statements like this clouding the thread. if you ingore them, why is it so damned important to post a thread to them...since they're opinion is obviously unimportant to you. Click your button and go on with your discussion. Sheesh!

Originally posted by Amuk

Originally posted by DrHoracid
Does national 'socialist" party mean anything? errr NAZI. Hitler was a leftist "socialist". And NO ONE should pay anyone elses medical bills. There should be no Governement nor third party (insurance) whatsoever.

What is socialist about a privite insurance company? Are you saying that free enterprise should not be allowed?

What I am saying is since the advent of Gov insurance (mediscam) medical cost have skyrocketed. That made private insurance cost go up also. healthcare cost would drop is ALL thrid party payments went away. They ould be no debate over personal health issues costing other people money.

No protect Chris from himself and save ME money BS.

Kegs, thanks for your version of history blaming jews for communisim.

What about the fat police. everyone is screaming about the loss of civil rights, what about the right to be fat?

[edit on 22-2-2005 by DrHoracid]

Originally posted by DrHoracid

Originally posted by goose
I agree totally but why do you assume its the liberals wanting this done. The liberals would be more in agrrement that it is no ones business but his own.

No its the liberals that want to control everything through twisted, arrogant PCness. PCness says this guy can't take care of himself so "we" must do it for him. Conservatives would say he has the freedom to do what he wants.................

DrH, honey - there are different kinds of conservatives and Republicans. Old-style Republicans and conservatives were laissez faire - but Bush-style Republicans want to lock people up and punish them... I think it has something to do with prison slave labor. Not absolutely sure tho - the Eugenics agenda is tied in somehow...



.

Originally posted by Ocelot
Question. Why the F*** does everything have to be Liberal vs Conservatives? I mean it seems to me that this has no relevance to the topic at hand whatsoever.

Because most people today are only capable of thinking in Lib vs. Con terms in all situations...

Originally posted by DrHoracid
What I am saying is since the advent of Gov insurance (mediscam) medical cost have skyrocketed. That made private insurance cost go up also. healthcare cost would drop is ALL thrid party payments went away. They ould be no debate over personal health issues costing other people money.

So a company that Voluntarily offers insurance for people to voluntarily buy, that makes a profit for itself and its shareholders and provides a service to its costumers should not be allowed?

Who is the Socialist here?

Originally posted by Amuk

Originally posted by DrHoracid
What I am saying is since the advent of Gov insurance (mediscam) medical cost have skyrocketed. That made private insurance cost go up also. healthcare cost would drop is ALL thrid party payments went away. They ould be no debate over personal health issues costing other people money.

So a company that Voluntarily offers insurance for people to voluntarily buy, that makes a profit for itself and its shareholders and provides a service to its costumers should not be allowed?

Who is the Socialist here?

Woah there Mucky, Insurance "profits" are locked based on a percentage of COST. The higher the cost the greater the amount of the profilts.

15% of a $100 vs 15% of $1,000,000. Drive up the "cost" to drive up profits. Free enterprise would be fine. Why do you think the paperwork is so bad. Higher "cost"..........

Originally posted by DrHoracid
[
Kegs, thanks for your version of history blaming jews for communisim.

[edit on 22-2-2005 by DrHoracid]

Dis you EVEN read Kegs, post? He did not blame communism on Jews, HITLER did. Hitler really did. If you knew a scintilla of Weimar/Thrid Reich History you would realize this.

Originally posted by DrHoracid
Free enterprise would be fine. Why do you think the paperwork is so bad. Higher "cost"..........

But you are free to not buy Insurance right?

Or do we need the Government to step in and protect us, since we aren't smart enough to do so on our own?

Originally posted by Amuk

Originally posted by DrHoracid
Free enterprise would be fine. Why do you think the paperwork is so bad. Higher "cost"..........

But you are free to not buy Insurance right?

Or do we need the Government to step in and protect us, since we aren't smart enough to do so on our own?

No I want Gov out of the insurance biz, including regulation. Health insurance is a choice, but, how many insurance requirements are not, ie, auto, etc......

well, If I remember right, there has been talk about requiring us all to be insured, I think it's the insurance industry that is pressing the issue....they think it would help if there were more insured younger, healthier people adding to the pool.....

Originally posted by DrHoracid

Kegs, thanks for your version of history blaming jews for communisim.

Lol, I didn't blame Jews for Communism. I was pointing out part of what Hitler used for his rationale of including Communism in his "Jewish conspiracy".
Nice sidestep though.

Originally posted by observer

Originally posted by DrHoracid
[
Kegs, thanks for your version of history blaming jews for communisim.

[edit on 22-2-2005 by DrHoracid]

Dis you EVEN read Kegs, post?

He did not blame communism on Jews, HITLER did. Hitler really did. If you knew a scintilla of Weimar/Thrid Reich History you would realize this.

Start a thread and find out there mod..........PS it's Third not thrid.....