It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: intrepid
Exactly. That extra dough could buy a few more cruise missiles.
How much does the royal family cost each person?
Alan Reid, Keeper of the Privy Purse, said the newly released accounts show that the royal family costs each taxpayer about 65 pence per year, representing the cost of a first-class stamp.27 Jun 2017
As the Queen becomes Britain's longest-reigning monarch, new research shows that the monarchy remains popular across all parts of British society
originally posted by: CornishCeltGuy
a reply to: eletheia
I'm against a constitutional monarchy for democracy reason alone.
I don't even think we need a head of state same as Australia doesn't need a governer general. The Prime Minister is effectively head of state.
I'd let the queen keep whichever houses she wants and cut the purse saying pay for the ones you want to live in yourself.
I honestly think it is shameful that in the 21st century an advanced nation has head of state decided by birthright.
There is no argument which will ever sway me from that position.
I'm waiting for what history says about Trump - - - and "that" election.
originally posted by: highvein
a reply to: Annee
I'm waiting for what history says about Trump - - - and "that" election.
Well. In the Present where we are now, history says that Trump won. In the future it could say that shortly after the election symptoms of a rare phenomena, similar to the Dancing Plague of 1518, showed up. Initially labeled Trump Derangement Syndrome, this phenomena started driving people mad to the point that they lost all sense of reality, but instead of dancing themselves to death, it was a total mindbreak. Today we refer to this phenomena as, well TDS, because quiet simply it was and is the perfect name.
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: highvein
a reply to: Annee
I'm waiting for what history says about Trump - - - and "that" election.
Well. In the Present where we are now, history says that Trump won. In the future it could say that shortly after the election symptoms of a rare phenomena, similar to the Dancing Plague of 1518, showed up. Initially labeled Trump Derangement Syndrome, this phenomena started driving people mad to the point that they lost all sense of reality, but instead of dancing themselves to death, it was a total mindbreak. Today we refer to this phenomena as, well TDS, because quiet simply it was and is the perfect name.
You want to accept him - - go ahead.
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: highvein
a reply to: Annee
I'm waiting for what history says about Trump - - - and "that" election.
Well. In the Present where we are now, history says that Trump won. In the future it could say that shortly after the election symptoms of a rare phenomena, similar to the Dancing Plague of 1518, showed up. Initially labeled Trump Derangement Syndrome, this phenomena started driving people mad to the point that they lost all sense of reality, but instead of dancing themselves to death, it was a total mindbreak. Today we refer to this phenomena as, well TDS, because quiet simply it was and is the perfect name.
You want to accept him - - go ahead.
originally posted by: RMFX1
originally posted by: Annee
Trump = Newbie (besides I don't believe anything he says)
Queen = A Lifetime of experience & protocol (why would I believe she revealed anything to Trump?)
I'm pretty sure that she wouldn't tell that
blabber mouth dotard anything.
originally posted by: highvein
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: highvein
a reply to: Annee
I'm waiting for what history says about Trump - - - and "that" election.
Well. In the Present where we are now, history says that Trump won. In the future it could say that shortly after the election symptoms of a rare phenomena, similar to the Dancing Plague of 1518, showed up. Initially labeled Trump Derangement Syndrome, this phenomena started driving people mad to the point that they lost all sense of reality, but instead of dancing themselves to death, it was a total mindbreak. Today we refer to this phenomena as, well TDS, because quiet simply it was and is the perfect name.
You want to accept him - - go ahead.
It is not about accepting him. It is about if I agree with what he is doing for the country. Some things yes, and some things no. But to totally be against everything he has done simply because you don't like someone personally is not the path I prefer. I prefer to give people a chance. Like I did Obama. Like I did Bush. and like I did Clinton. They all failed miserably. It is time to try something new. Anything really.
originally posted by: c2oden
originally posted by: highvein
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: highvein
a reply to: Annee
I'm waiting for what history says about Trump - - - and "that" election.
Well. In the Present where we are now, history says that Trump won. In the future it could say that shortly after the election symptoms of a rare phenomena, similar to the Dancing Plague of 1518, showed up. Initially labeled Trump Derangement Syndrome, this phenomena started driving people mad to the point that they lost all sense of reality, but instead of dancing themselves to death, it was a total mindbreak. Today we refer to this phenomena as, well TDS, because quiet simply it was and is the perfect name.
You want to accept him - - go ahead.
It is not about accepting him. It is about if I agree with what he is doing for the country. Some things yes, and some things no. But to totally be against everything he has done simply because you don't like someone personally is not the path I prefer. I prefer to give people a chance. Like I did Obama. Like I did Bush. and like I did Clinton. They all failed miserably. It is time to try something new. Anything really.
This is how most rational people think.
Remember, some here are not rational.
It is hate, hate, hate no matter what someone may do.
originally posted by: CharlesT
a reply to: ufoorbhunter
I admit I haven't read all posts in the other thread elethia kindly directed me to but you appear to be one of the few and far between that approve of staying in the EU. Is that observation accurate?
originally posted by: eletheiaIts a protectionist bloc.
originally posted by: rhynouk
originally posted by: ufoorbhunter
originally posted by: CharlesT
a reply to: ufoorbhunter
I admit I haven't read all posts in the other thread elethia kindly directed me to but you appear to be one of the few and far between that approve of staying in the EU. Is that observation accurate?
. In the real world the majority of Brits want to remain in the EU.