It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: carewemust
SUMMARY: GOP "Got Played" by Peter Strzok on Thursday:
More at: www.foxnews.com...
The hearing never had a chance of uncovering the truth. This is so because Strzok enjoyed the advantage of being able to shower the committees with self-serving protestations while hiding behind the restrictions on his testimony imposed by the FBI attorney hovering behind him.
Strzok understood this and exploited his opportunity to the hilt while snuggling up to the anti-Trump Democrats embracing him.
The savvy Strzok cleverly outmaneuvered the Republicans on the committees. That’s surprising, given the extensive experience of Oversight Committee Chairman Trey Gowdy, R-S.C., as a former federal prosecutor. Gowdy should have known better than to take the bait.
The Republican members succeeded only in turning Strzok into a Democratic hero and giving him a national audience for his emphatic denials of Republican allegations that his anti-Trump and pro-Clinton political allegiance influenced his investigations involving the two candidates.
That crafty weasel! Won't help him though, if the "silent executioner" ( Jeff Sessions ) activates himself.
originally posted by: IAMTAT
Strzok says he can't remember changing "Grossly Negligent" to "Extremely Careless".
Metadata says Strzok's computer made the change.
Strzok then says only HE and his secretary (to limited files) had access to his computer...So he must've made the change.
NOW...(Blue Aja?)...didn't we see a text from Page reminding Strzok to allow access to his computer for her?
Mark Meadows
Verified account @RepMarkMeadows
7h7 hours ago
Remarkably, we learned new information today suggesting the DOJ had not notified Lisa Page of Congress' outstanding interview requests for over 7 months now. The DOJ/FBI appear to be continuing their efforts to keep material facts, and perhaps even witnesses, from Congress.
potentially indicated or created the appearance that investigative decisions were impacted by bias or improper considerations
originally posted by: TheRedneck
a reply to: IAMTAT
Well, let's be honest here... they also consider the porn star who is now sitting in a jail cell as their hero as well...
Oh, and her infallible lawyer who is fighting disbarment. Can't forget him.
TheRedneck
originally posted by: Pyle
a reply to: IAMTAT
potentially indicated or created the appearance that investigative decisions were impacted by bias or improper considerations
Its in the damn IG report. The appearance of bias during an investigation (whether or not the bias effected the investigaion) is enough to remove someone.
originally posted by: TheRedneck
a reply to: Pyle
You mean the porn star that was released quickly and quietly after they found they had wrongfully arrested her?
Yeah, that porn star.
Still a porn star heralded as a shining example of virtue.
TheRedneck
Still a porn star heralded as a shining example of virtue.
And former mistress to a married man that became president. Who was paid large sums of money by the presidential candidate's "attorney" during the election to keep her quite. A payment that likely broke campaign finance laws. She was good enough for President Trump.
Think she'll get the Nobel Porn Prize this year?