House Resolution on DOJ/FBI Misconduct - Is this real?

I just ran across this in my YouTube feed. It appears to be a legit press conference announcing a resolution to be introduced to the House to investigate misconduct (I hate that whitewash word) on the part of the DOJ and FBI regarding the investigation into Hillary's and the Obama administration's "misdeeds" (i.e., criminal activity).

(I've edited to use a video clip that only contains the press conference (which, BTW, Sillyolme, is a matter of public record regardless of whether it's on YouTube).

:

a reply to: incoserv

Yeah because major investigations are ALWAYS announced via YouTube

It's from a week or two ago, but it's still making the rounds. Pretty powerful stuff, because they lay it all out: Hillary's e-mail server, Uranium 1, the Clinton Foundation, FISA abuse, the Russian Collusion witch hunt, and the FBI/DOJ coverup and interference with all of this.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: incoserv

Yeah because major investigations are ALWAYS announced via YouTube

Now there's some thoughtful, cerebral, intelligent and really, really productive rebuttal!

It's a House of Representatives press conference. It's public record.


:

originally posted by: AndyFromMichigan
It's from a week or two ago, but it's still making the rounds. ...

Thanks.

Do you know when they press conference was first held? And has there been any news on where this is going?

I've been traveling last two months and an a bit out of the loop.

Are they talking about:
H.Res 907 ?

It is definitely quite detailed regarding the concerns.

a reply to: Sillyolme

This is why independent media is growing. If MSM isn’t covering what’s happening, more news will be going independent.

Embrace change, don’t be stuck in the old way if doing things

a reply to: SocratesJohnson

10% rule.

It states that the user must be at least 10% smarter than the machine he/she is trying to operate.

It has hampered many in it's existence.

originally posted by: SocratesJohnson
a reply to: Sillyolme

This is why independent media is growing. If MSM isn’t covering what’s happening, more news will be going independent.

Embrace change, don’t be stuck in the old way if doing things

When one has nothing of value to add to the conversation, is lacking any principle argument or foundation from which to speak, one can only make inflammatory comments to obfuscate and distract.

originally posted by: SocratesJohnson
a reply to: Sillyolme

This is why independent media is growing. If MSM isn’t covering what’s happening, more news will be going independent.

Embrace change, don’t be stuck in the old way if doing things

"Independent media" is typically more partisan and fake than normal news.

IMO.

originally posted by: BlueAjah
Are they talking about:
H.Res 907 ?

It is definitely quite detailed regarding the concerns.

I think that may be it. If it is, it's over a month old.

But, obviously, since it's not all over CNN Or MSNBC, we don't need to know about it, so I apologise for exposing anyone to any potentially progressive-unfriendly information since we're obviously all to ignorant to think for ourselves.
:

4D chess will take 4^4 times longer.

Be patient and awake.

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: SocratesJohnson
a reply to: Sillyolme

This is why independent media is growing. If MSM isn’t covering what’s happening, more news will be going independent.

Embrace change, don’t be stuck in the old way if doing things

"Independent media" is typically more partisan and fake than normal news.

IMO.

I think any attempts to spread news outside of CNN should be shut down. I mean they have "news" right in their name.

People have no right to spread information that hasn't been "approved".

originally posted by: incoserv

originally posted by: AndyFromMichigan
It's from a week or two ago, but it's still making the rounds. ...

Thanks.

Do you know when they press conference was first held? And has there been any news on where this is going?

I've been traveling last two months and an a bit out of the loop.

It was mentioned in the Q thread. The press conference was on June 20th.

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: SocratesJohnson
a reply to: Sillyolme

This is why independent media is growing. If MSM isn’t covering what’s happening, more news will be going independent.

Embrace change, don’t be stuck in the old way if doing things

"Independent media" is typically more partisan and fake than normal news.

IMO.

If you thought/said/typed that with a straight face...

just, smh/lol

a reply to: BlueAjah

Thanks for that. I take it from what I read that no action has been taken on it.

I rather doubt any will.

And if any action is taken.........again, it'll be a dog and pony show offering up nothing of substance. Proving once again that regardless of party affiliation, what you've got running the government is basically a criminal cabal.

originally posted by: TonyS
a reply to: BlueAjah

... Proving once again that regardless of party affiliation, what you've got running the government is basically a criminal cabal.

Yeah. Though I want to hope against hope, I'm inclined to agree.

The tree of liberty is looking mighty dry.
:

a reply to: TonyS

I share your doubt.

I do however hope for once there will be an enlightenment without excessive or world war violence in this age.

a reply to: incoserv

I see this and then I viewed this vid:




But I haven't heard a peep from the MSM.

I'm beginning to think this is too good to be real

originally posted by: six67seven

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: SocratesJohnson
a reply to: Sillyolme

This is why independent media is growing. If MSM isn’t covering what’s happening, more news will be going independent.

Embrace change, don’t be stuck in the old way if doing things

"Independent media" is typically more partisan and fake than normal news.

IMO.

If you thought/said/typed that with a straight face...

just, smh/lol

... and the cult agrees with you.

Care to explain how you think "independent media" isn't more partisan than network/cable/maintstream?

How about some examples and cogent discussion?

Or, do you want to SYH some more?