It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: scraedtosleep
originally posted by: Aazadan
originally posted by: scraedtosleep
a reply to: Metallicus
Where is attorney-client privilege listed as a right in the bill of rights?
It's part of due process. That said, privilege is not absolute, it can be breached. In this case it hasn't but likely will be soon.
I am honestly ignorant of this. Could you give more detail. Quote the part of the bill of rights that deals with client privilege.
originally posted by: Aazadan
originally posted by: crtrvt
Could it be that Trump has been feeding Hannity talking points through Cohen, and using his attorney-client privilege to shroud the fact that he's the source?
Unlikely as journalists already have the ability to protect their sources, and for as much as Hannity claims he's not a journalist he meets every definition as being a member of the press.
If they were communicating it was the communications themselves and not the source that they're trying to keep secret.
originally posted by: burdman30ott6
originally posted by: Scrubdog
What if he was being paid to pass along certain "favorable" views of certain candidates, or what if he was paid to pile on dirt on certain organizations that are investigating certain politicians?
Media personalities are paid to skew reports all over the place. Media endorses candidates every year. Again to my initial point, WaPo, CNN, MSNBC... even FOX at times was certainly pushing more favorable views of Hillary Clinton than Trump, so as I said, if they were to accuse Hannity of this, I can only imagine the bloodbath media floodgates that would open.
originally posted by: carewemust
Since Hannity didn't pay Cohen anything for the occasional advice, nothing to see here. Even if he did pay him for advice, nothing to see here.
But it's always nice seeing how easily distracted MSM and Democrats are from learning how to WIN.
originally posted by: carewemust
Since Hannity didn't pay Cohen anything for the occasional advice, nothing to see here. Even if he did pay him for advice, nothing to see here.
But it's always nice seeing how easily distracted MSM and Democrats are from learning how to WIN.
originally posted by: Bicent
a reply to: introvert
I don’t want to get sucked into the quagmire but hannity, has always been republican biased not just for trump..
Just saying.
It is reasonable to suggest or question whether Hannity may be a paid propaganda mouthpiece for the president of the United States.
originally posted by: cosmickat
a reply to: introvert
Hmmm good point....free legal advice
No wonder he wanted it kept on the DL ! Hehe
Anyhoo..who goes to a NDA specialist fixer kinda lawyer for real estate advice ? Even if it is free...
Free legal advice in exchange for complete devotion and constant faux news swill
Sounds legit
originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: introvert
It is reasonable to suggest or question whether Hannity may be a paid propaganda mouthpiece for the president of the United States.
It is reasonable. In fact, if there is truth to that, it should be the bigger focus. However, will we finally begin to apply this in all media aspects or simply continue to shine light only on one 'side?"