Seth Rich's dad confirmed son was Wikileaker

a reply to: Justoneman


1) Gateway Pundit is Right Wing Fake News Porn.

2) Seth Rich's father never said it and Gateway Pundit has been forced to Modify the article.

This story was updated after we were contacted by the Chicago law firm representing Joel and Mary Rich.
They deny the claims by Butowsky.

UPDATE: We altered this article after we received a letter from the family attorney. Nothing that we have ever reported on this story has had malicious intent. Our heart goes out to the family. We hope this case is solved for the sake of the family.

a reply to: soberbacchus

Way to let the truth get in the way of a good old fashioned circle jerk.

originally posted by: soberbacchus
a reply to: Justoneman


1) Gateway Pundit is Right Wing Fake News Porn.

2) Seth Rich's father never said it and Gateway Pundit has been forced to Modify the article.

This story was updated after we were contacted by the Chicago law firm representing Joel and Mary Rich.
They deny the claims by Butowsky.

UPDATE: We altered this article after we received a letter from the family attorney. Nothing that we have ever reported on this story has had malicious intent. Our heart goes out to the family. We hope this case is solved for the sake of the family.

Seth Rich was still murdered, and everyone knows John Podesta ordered it with Clinton approval. And everyone knows what a lying weasel DW Schultz is as well, and how they obstructed and colluded with FBI assistance to cover all their tracks even covering for the Seth Rich assassination.
So Fake news about it, no matter who the source is is just background noise.

a reply to: NoCorruptionAllowed


How does "everybody know" this? Ouija boards?

originally posted by: DJW001
How does "everybody know" this? Ouija boards?

Everyone in the circle jerk arrives at the same "conclusion".

originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: NoCorruptionAllowed


How does "everybody know" this? Ouija boards?

You think people need Ouija boards to know how corrupt and scumbagging Hillary and her organized crime units are?

You think people need Ouija boards to know what a POS DW Schultz is, or what a POS John Podesta is?

HAH what a joke.

a reply to: Sillyolme

I don't know that the FBI was to have been involved, but Seth was indeed scheduled to be a witness in an exit polling fraud case.

ATS thread "Local activist files suit for access to exit polling data, Dead witness blocks path to truth," by yours truly.

Unfortunately, the case was dismissed though esteemed member MotherMayEye found some potential shenanigans in regards to the judge assigned to the case.

Relevant posts begin here.

originally posted by: NoCorruptionAllowed

originally posted by: soberbacchus
a reply to: Justoneman


1) Gateway Pundit is Right Wing Fake News Porn.

2) Seth Rich's father never said it and Gateway Pundit has been forced to Modify the article.

This story was updated after we were contacted by the Chicago law firm representing Joel and Mary Rich.
They deny the claims by Butowsky.

UPDATE: We altered this article after we received a letter from the family attorney. Nothing that we have ever reported on this story has had malicious intent. Our heart goes out to the family. We hope this case is solved for the sake of the family.

Seth Rich was still murdered, and everyone knows John Podesta ordered it with Clinton approval. And everyone knows what a lying weasel DW Schultz is as well

That jumps the fence from BS to delusional.

So Fake news about it, no matter who the source is is just background noise.

That is Seth Rich's father who calls BS on the article and claim that he said his son was the wikileaks source and so much so that he had a legal team slap down the propagandist fake news site Gateway Pundit.

Seth Rich's father responding to his dead son and himself being lied about for right wing fake news porn purposes is not "background noise" and it is full-on disgusting that you would dismiss it as such.

originally posted by: soberbacchus
a reply to: Justoneman


1) Gateway Pundit is Right Wing Fake News Porn.

2) Seth Rich's father never said it and Gateway Pundit has been forced to Modify the article.

This story was updated after we were contacted by the Chicago law firm representing Joel and Mary Rich.
They deny the claims by Butowsky.

UPDATE: We altered this article after we received a letter from the family attorney. Nothing that we have ever reported on this story has had malicious intent. Our heart goes out to the family. We hope this case is solved for the sake of the family.

Which probably comes straight from Brad Bauman. Ask yourself why.

originally posted by: Wardaddy454

originally posted by: soberbacchus
a reply to: Justoneman


1) Gateway Pundit is Right Wing Fake News Porn.

2) Seth Rich's father never said it and Gateway Pundit has been forced to Modify the article.

This story was updated after we were contacted by the Chicago law firm representing Joel and Mary Rich.
They deny the claims by Butowsky.

UPDATE: We altered this article after we received a letter from the family attorney. Nothing that we have ever reported on this story has had malicious intent. Our heart goes out to the family. We hope this case is solved for the sake of the family.

Which probably comes straight from Brad Bauman. Ask yourself why.

Brad Burman is a PR consultant who works for the Dems. Interesting choice of attorney there.
Sorry, but Seth Rich's family stinks. They seem to be more upset at the thought that he leaked the e-mails than that he was murdered.

originally posted by: soberbacchus
Seth Rich's father never said it and Gateway Pundit has been forced to Modify the article.

"This story was updated after we were contacted by the Chicago law firm representing Joel and Mary Rich.
They deny the claims by Butowsky."

"UPDATE: We altered this article after we received a letter from the family attorney. Nothing that we have ever reported on this story has had malicious intent. Our heart goes out to the family. We hope this case is solved for the sake of the family.?

What claims exactly does Joel Rich deny? The update is oddly (and worthlessly) vague...

originally posted by: MotherMayEye


What claims exactly does Joel Rich deny? The update is oddly (and worthlessly) vague...

"The claims by Butowski"

AKA the claims that the article is based on.

originally posted by: soberbacchus

originally posted by: MotherMayEye


What claims exactly does Joel Rich deny? The update is oddly (and worthlessly) vague...

"The claims by Butowski"

AKA the claims that the article is based on.

That he talked to him on December 17, 2016?

Is he saying he talked to him on December 18, 2016, instead? Is every single claim disputed or merely some of them? I wish the letter from the parents was published so I know what exactly we are talking about here.

a reply to: MotherMayEye

Maybe that he "confirmed son was Wikileaker".

I guess hope really is the last thing to die.

a reply to: madmac5150

I mean, most reasonable accept that the Clintons are killers. Even people who swing left know it on some level.

To believe the Clintons aren’t at least corrupt takes a huge suspension of reality.

Where did you hear about this insurance thing!? Very interesting if true.

a reply to: Justoneman>>>> They mentioned wikileaks and the DNC hacked emails and the claims it was the Russians. I thought that it was almost immediately determined that the Russians had nothing to do with it based on there being no evidence and they had moved on. Now I heard on Hannity that they're still trying to say the Russians did it, again with zero evidence and proof to the contrary. What is with this "the Russians are to blame" nonsense like they're trying to start a war with them? The elections, hacking, social media bots and trolls, Syria, its like our own feds and the Russians want a cold war. And this has been going on for a few years, not just since Trump got in. If anything they seem to want him out so they can have an easier time staging this charade.

originally posted by: Dutchowl
a reply to: Justoneman>>>> They mentioned wikileaks and the DNC hacked emails and the claims it was the Russians. I thought that it was almost immediately determined that the Russians had nothing to do with it based on there being no evidence and they had moved on. Now I heard on Hannity that they're still trying to say the Russians did it, again with zero evidence and proof to the contrary. What is with this "the Russians are to blame" nonsense like they're trying to start a war with them? The elections, hacking, social media bots and trolls, Syria, its like our own feds and the Russians want a cold war. And this has been going on for a few years, not just since Trump got in. If anything they seem to want him out so they can have an easier time staging this charade.

But at this rate it will be 2021 before they stop blaming the Russians for their own deceit against Bernie. His voters got hosed without any possibility of the Russians. Hell, they probably didn't have to help either commie. Both had a chance at the D's nomination.

a reply to: Dutchowl

I thought that it was almost immediately determined that the Russians had nothing to do with it based on there being no evidence and they had moved on. Now I heard on Hannity that they're still trying to say the Russians did it, again with zero evidence and proof to the contrary.

We now have a lengthy series of testimonials that the Russians approached the Trump campaign with hacked emails and other "incriminating documents" prior to the release of the emails on WikiLeaks. This is coupled with the statements by intelligence agencies, both American and allied, that the hacks were done by Russia. No reasonable person can doubt that this is the case. What "evidence to the contrary" has Hannity found? (He had better be careful, his finances may be investigated soon.)

originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: Dutchowl

I thought that it was almost immediately determined that the Russians had nothing to do with it based on there being no evidence and they had moved on. Now I heard on Hannity that they're still trying to say the Russians did it, again with zero evidence and proof to the contrary.

We now have a lengthy series of testimonials that the Russians approached the Trump campaign with hacked emails and other "incriminating documents" prior to the release of the emails on WikiLeaks. This is coupled with the statements by intelligence agencies, both American and allied, that the hacks were done by Russia. No reasonable person can doubt that this is the case. What "evidence to the contrary" has Hannity found? (He had better be careful, his finances may be investigated soon.)

Those testimonials pail in comparison to the actual FACTS in the Clinton campaign and Fund. Pale in comparison to selling Russia! Uranium! 1st the previous criminal leadeship before we can move to any boogeymen in Trump's closets.