It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: neo96
It is a RIGHT to have a lawyer present.
Flynn did not.
Now this farce has been outted for what it is.
Fruit of the poisonous tree.
Every one gets a get out of jail free card.
Flynn,Bannon,Manafort.
They can not use illegal means to 'GETCHA'.
originally posted by: ParkerCramer
originally posted by: neo96
It is a RIGHT to have a lawyer present.
Flynn did not.
Now this farce has been outted for what it is.
Fruit of the poisonous tree.
Every one gets a get out of jail free card.
Flynn,Bannon,Manafort.
They can not use illegal means to 'GETCHA'.
So, he was denied counsel?
Or he chose not to have counsel?
I guess if you had used some sense, you would not have been able to join in the delusional fun fest.
Are YOU willing to make a bet that Flynn, Gates and Manafort DO NOT get out of jail free?
And why would you include Brannon? Has he been indicted?
MTUBY
originally posted by: Pyle
Shouldnt the Title of this thread be "Trump supporting twitter users make claim". It is amazing to see people who decry anonymous sources switch to loving them.
How long do we have before it will become apparent that nothing will come from this? The division between the Rs and Ds is merely illusion in the swamp. They are simply taking their agreed upon terms between the good cops and bad cops.
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
a reply to: Grambler
a reply to: MotherMayEye
Thanks for the clarification. Interesting that at some point he didn't request council. Maybe he was playing them by knowing this could cause them a problem down the road although I think that would be a risky gamble.
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
originally posted by: ketsuko
Had they revealed what they were doing ahead of time, Flynn likely would have had counsel present.
But why didnt he end the meeting or call for counsel when he saw how it was progressing? That is the question.
originally posted by: ketsuko
Maybe they didn't tell him or maybe there weren't any real signals...
originally posted by: BlueAjah
A better question is - was that discussion really of the nature portrayed by the FBI?
Since Pete Strzok was one of the 2 agents involved in that interview...
...
Perhaps the other agent in the interview is one of the ones who agreed to testify on behalf of Flynn.
originally posted by: ketsuko
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
a reply to: Grambler
a reply to: MotherMayEye
Thanks for the clarification. Interesting that at some point he didn't request council. Maybe he was playing them by knowing this could cause them a problem down the road although I think that would be a risky gamble.
My understanding is that the FBI called Flynn's scheduler and scheduled the meeting, but they did not indicate that it was anything other than a regular meeting. In Flynn's capacity for the administration, meeting with the FBI would not have been an unusual thing, so seeing a meeting with teh FBI on his schedule would not have raised any red flags; it would have been a common occurrence for his job.
However, when the agents showed up. They then turned it into an interview over the investigation. Had they revealed what they were doing ahead of time, Flynn likely would have had counsel present.
originally posted by: smurfy
I would steer very clear of this boyo, he is disinfo, and acted in large fake news propaganda possibly orchestrated by Russian sources and may have friends in other [Trump friendly] countries.
He was lieutenant junior grade naval intelligence officer, in August 2017 his security clearance was revoked.
originally posted by: Assessor
I still believe Flynn can also get his conviction overturned simply because his lie was based on an illegal wiretap. Of course some of the libtard idiots here in ATS laughed at me for posting a thread on it. Seems they believe political opposition spying is no big deal. Lol...if all this is allowed to slide I wonder if they’d give the green light for the Trump administration to do the same in 2020.