It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: theantediluvian
And here's where the "grand conspiracy theory" false apart. The best part about this? Is that it also blows up another narrative that the Trump crowd tried to rally around — that texts were somehow deliberately deleted by the FBI.
But hey? Who's really keeping track?
As has been reported, the FBI was having issues with Samsung phones relaying texts messages for long term storage. Those issues resulted in a lack of retention for about 1 in 10 FBI-issued devices apparently for months.
Guess what phones weren't having problems? Ding Ding Ding! iPhones. Now read the text in proper context.
So they were having problems with retention with the Samsung phones. Right? Page says she's getting an iPhone. To which Strzok replied, "Oh hot damn. . . We get around our security/monitoring issues?"
What are the issues he's referring to getting around? Problems with the Samsung phones NOT retaining emails.
originally posted by: Tarzan the apeman.
I don't even know who one should trust in government anymore. If they do another Special Prosecutor then who appoints them? Do you really want the guilty appointing their own? Its a stacked deck and the only to play a straight game is get a new deck. How is that going to come about?
originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: burntheships
People laughed and scorned when the president said that the FBI is in tatters.
originally posted by: GuidedKill
Easy. There was never actually a relationship. They were discussing business. The business of treason.
Think about it. We all have seen that chick. Do you want that blowing up your personal phone all night? Then your wife thinks your cheating on her with that hyena. No way anyone was cheating with that. Usually it’s a upgrade not a downgrade.
Yuck
originally posted by: burntheships
originally posted by: GuidedKill
Easy. There was never actually a relationship. They were discussing business. The business of treason.
Think about it. We all have seen that chick. Do you want that blowing up your personal phone all night? Then your wife thinks your cheating on her with that hyena. No way anyone was cheating with that. Usually it’s a upgrade not a downgrade.
Yuck
Now we know all about it, thanks to these two.
As has been reported, the FBI was having issues with Samsung phones relaying texts messages for long term storage. Those issues resulted in a lack of retention for about 1 in 10 FBI-issued devices apparently for months.
Guess what phones weren't having problems? Ding Ding Ding! iPhones. Now read the text in proper context.
If they wanted to be secure they could have run their message and emails through any one of the tor programs and networks. They didn't, it's almost like they wanted this stuff recorded for later.
originally posted by: Moresby
All those texts reveal is how two people act when they just start dating.
Embarrassing? Yes. But only in a human (we've all done it) way.
Politically significant? Nah.
Page: Have a meeting with turgal about getting iphone in a day or so
Strzok: Oh hot damn. . . We get around our security/monitoring issues?
Page: No, he’s proposing that we just stop following them. Apparently the requirement to capture texts came from [Office of Management and Budget], but we’re the only org (I’m told) who is following that rule. His point is, if no one else is doing it why should we. . . I’m told – thought I have seen – that there is an IG report that says everyone is failing. But one has changed anything, so why not just join in the failure.
originally posted by: whyamIhere
It's illegal.
Our Founders would of already hanged them.
It's not cute it's treason.
originally posted by: theantediluvian
Guess what phones weren't having problems? Ding Ding Ding! iPhones.
Page: Have a meeting with turgal about getting iphone in a day or so
Strzok: Oh hot damn. . . We get around our security/monitoring issues?
Page: No, he’s proposing that we just stop following them. Apparently the requirement to capture texts came from [Office of Management and Budget], but we’re the only org (I’m told) who is following that rule.
His point is, if no one else is doing it why should we. . .
I’m told – thought I have seen – that there is an IG report that says everyone is failing. But one has changed anything, so why not just join in the failure.
originally posted by: Jonjonj
a reply to: theantediluvian
Page: Have a meeting with turgal about getting iphone in a day or so
Strzok: Oh hot damn. . . We get around our security/monitoring issues?
Page: No, he’s proposing that we just stop following them. Apparently the requirement to capture texts came from [Office of Management and Budget], but we’re the only org (I’m told) who is following that rule. His point is, if no one else is doing it why should we. . . I’m told – thought I have seen – that there is an IG report that says everyone is failing. But one has changed anything, so why not just join in the failure.
And just to be clear, nothing in the above exchange suggests they changed their phones in order to comply with the requirement for text retention, it clearly states they were going to IGNORE the requirement...
You were saying?
Edit to add: Why did all the other organisations suddenly decide they didn't want to follow the rule about the retention of texts? Are you not interested in that angle?
originally posted by: DJW001
At the institution I work at, we need to change our email passwords every six weeks. The result? We all use our private emails, just like Hillary Clinton did.
originally posted by: burntheships
originally posted by: theantediluvian
Guess what phones weren't having problems? Ding Ding Ding! iPhones.
Ante,
I think your purposely overlooking the word "failure"
Lets look at the entire text again.
Page: Have a meeting with turgal about getting iphone in a day or so
Strzok: Oh hot damn. . . We get around our security/monitoring issues?
Page: No, he’s proposing that we just stop following them. Apparently the requirement to capture texts came from [Office of Management and Budget], but we’re the only org (I’m told) who is following that rule.
His point is, if no one else is doing it why should we. . .
I’m told – thought I have seen – that there is an IG report that says everyone is failing. But one has changed anything, so why not just join in the failure.
thehill.com...
This is very clear. NO one is following the record keeping requirement,
so they plan to join in.
originally posted by: Moresby
All those texts reveal is how two people act when they just start dating.
Embarrassing? Yes. But only in a human (we've all done it) way.
Politically significant? Nah.
No, this doesn't make anything fall apart. It actually explains why the FBI said their texts weren't retained for five months, but *voila* suddenly they were all there.
It's like the 'affair' claim.
The FBI knows whats in the Strzok/Page texts...and they have tried to cover their butts ahead of time with the 'affair' story and the story about the Samsung devices having issues.
That's as plausible as what you are suggesting...maybe more. Those texts were in fact retained. Strzok and Page? I am not convinced they were having an affair. I see no evidence of that.
originally posted by: burntheships
Page: Have a meeting with turgal about getting iphone in a day or so
Strzok: Oh hot damn. . . We get around our security/monitoring issues?
Page: No, he’s proposing that we just stop following them. Apparently the requirement to capture texts came from [Office of Management and Budget], but we’re the only org (I’m told) who is following that rule.
His point is, if no one else is doing it why should we. . .
I’m told – thought I have seen – that there is an IG report that says everyone is failing. But one has changed anything, so why not just join in the failure.
thehill.com...
In light of this, Senator Ron Johnson has now expanded the investigation
and sent a demand to the DOJ for the records of 16 other FBI employees,
including James Comey and Andrew McCabe.
"According to text messages produced to the Committee, Ms. Page and Mr. Strzok make references to communicating with other FBI employees via text message, phone call, email, and voice mail. Additional text messages suggest that FBI officials used non-official email accounts and messaging programs to communicate about official business," the letter says.
The letter goes on to request the communications of 16 additional current and former FBI officials, including former FBI Director James Comey; ex-Comey chief of staff James Rybicki; outgoing deputy director Andrew McCabe; former FBI general counsel James Baker and many other top officials.
www.foxnews.com...
originally posted by: DJW001
At the institution I work at, we need to change our email passwords every six weeks. The result? We all use our private emails, just like Hillary Clinton did.